Efficacy of urokinase in maintaining patency of hemodialysis catheters: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical nephrology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.5414/CN111239
Jiaxiu Deng, Weixiang Luo, Weiwei Zhang, Shiyi Xiong, Liping Wang
{"title":"Efficacy of urokinase in maintaining patency of hemodialysis catheters: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Jiaxiu Deng, Weixiang Luo, Weiwei Zhang, Shiyi Xiong, Liping Wang","doi":"10.5414/CN111239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter malfunctions are associated with reduced blood flow and interrupted dialysis during hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether the use of urokinase to lock hemodialysis catheters can maintain their patency and prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Chinese medical databases were searched for controlled trials of hemodialysis catheter locking using urokinase from database inception until July 15, 2021. The primary outcome was catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcomes were the peak catheter blood flow rate (Qb) and CRBSIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 16 trials, 1,041 patients were randomized to receive either urokinase/urokinase mixture (treated) or heparin (control) locks once or thrice a week. Locking with urokinase alone or in combination with another substance significantly prevented catheter malfunction. The effect on Qb was significant, with that in the treated group being better than in the control group. Similarly, the incidence of CRBSIs in the treated group was lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urokinase locking maintains catheter patency more effectively than heparin. Prophylactic locking with urokinase or urokinase mixtures reduces incidences of catheter malfunction, which ensures the smooth progression of hemodialysis and reduces patient medical costs. The results of this study have important clinical implications and will provide guidance to medical practitioners globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":10396,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"212-222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catheter malfunctions are associated with reduced blood flow and interrupted dialysis during hemodialysis.

Aim: This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether the use of urokinase to lock hemodialysis catheters can maintain their patency and prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs).

Materials and methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Chinese medical databases were searched for controlled trials of hemodialysis catheter locking using urokinase from database inception until July 15, 2021. The primary outcome was catheter malfunction, and the secondary outcomes were the peak catheter blood flow rate (Qb) and CRBSIs.

Results: Across 16 trials, 1,041 patients were randomized to receive either urokinase/urokinase mixture (treated) or heparin (control) locks once or thrice a week. Locking with urokinase alone or in combination with another substance significantly prevented catheter malfunction. The effect on Qb was significant, with that in the treated group being better than in the control group. Similarly, the incidence of CRBSIs in the treated group was lower.

Conclusion: Urokinase locking maintains catheter patency more effectively than heparin. Prophylactic locking with urokinase or urokinase mixtures reduces incidences of catheter malfunction, which ensures the smooth progression of hemodialysis and reduces patient medical costs. The results of this study have important clinical implications and will provide guidance to medical practitioners globally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿激酶保持血液透析导管通畅的功效:荟萃分析。
背景:目的:本荟萃分析旨在确定使用尿激酶锁定血液透析导管是否能保持导管通畅并预防导管相关血流感染(CRBSIs):在 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase 和中文医学数据库中检索了自数据库建立起至 2021 年 7 月 15 日使用尿激酶锁定血液透析导管的对照试验。主要结果为导管故障,次要结果为导管峰值血流量(Qb)和CRBSIs:在16项试验中,1041名患者随机接受了每周一次或三次的尿激酶/尿激酶混合物(治疗)或肝素(对照)锁定。单独使用尿激酶或与其他物质联合使用可显著预防导管故障。对 Qb 的影响非常明显,治疗组的 Qb 优于对照组。同样,治疗组的 CRBSI 发生率也较低:结论:与肝素相比,尿激酶锁定能更有效地保持导管通畅。使用尿激酶或尿激酶混合物进行预防性锁定可降低导管故障的发生率,从而确保血液透析的顺利进行并降低患者的医疗费用。这项研究的结果具有重要的临床意义,将为全球医疗从业人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nephrology
Clinical nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nephrology appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: prophylaxis, pathophysiology, immunology, diagnosis, therapy, experimental approaches and dialysis and transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous remission of de novo membranous nephropathy in post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: A report of two cases. Impact of depression on clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Renal involvement in genetic neurocutaneous syndromes. Drug-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis: Serial C-reactive protein measurements might predict the course of acute kidney injury. Microarray analysis of microRNA profiles for assessing the therapeutic effects of sodium thiosulfate on end-stage renal disease combined with coronary artery calcification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1