The distinct impacts of sarcopenic and dynapenic obesity on mortality in middle-aged and older adults based on different adiposity metrics: Results from I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2024.06.035
Li-Yen Tseng , Chih-Kuang Liang , Li-Ning Peng , Ming-Hsien Lin , Ching-Hui Loh , Wei-Ju Lee , Fei-Yuan Hsiao , Liang-Kung Chen
{"title":"The distinct impacts of sarcopenic and dynapenic obesity on mortality in middle-aged and older adults based on different adiposity metrics: Results from I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study","authors":"Li-Yen Tseng ,&nbsp;Chih-Kuang Liang ,&nbsp;Li-Ning Peng ,&nbsp;Ming-Hsien Lin ,&nbsp;Ching-Hui Loh ,&nbsp;Wei-Ju Lee ,&nbsp;Fei-Yuan Hsiao ,&nbsp;Liang-Kung Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2024.06.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><p>Sarcopenic obesity (SO) and dynapenic obesity (DO) represent two manifestations of excessive fat accumulation concurrent with compromised muscle mass and function, thereby necessitating an examination of their implications for health. This study aims to investigate the relationship between SO/DO and mortality, taking into account various adiposity measures and existing sarcopenia criteria, with further stratified analyses based on age and gender.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study sample comprised 1779 older adults residing in the community from the I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study (ILAS). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was adhered to the 2019 consensus of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, while adiposity was measured by waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), and fat percentage. SO/DO was defined as the coexistence of sarcopenia/dynapenia and obesity. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were adopted to examine the association between SO or DO, defined by WC, BMI, fat percentage, and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This 11-year follow-up study of 1779 participants aged 63.9 ± 9.2 years involved 15,068 person-years and 229 deaths. WC-defined SO (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3, p = 0.021) and WC-defined DO (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.9, p = 0.022) significantly increased mortality risk, whereas definitions employing alternative adiposity metrics exhibited no statistical significance. WC-defined SO was associated with increased risk of mortality among middle-aged adults, while WC-defined DO was associated with increased risk of mortality among older adults. In sex-specific analysis, WC-defined DO was also associated with increased risk of mortality in men (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.4, p = 0.019), while defined by other measurements showed no associations in both sexes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study identified a significant link between SO/DO, defined by WC, and an 11-year mortality risk, advocating for WC-defined adiposity as an obesity measure and personalized interventions considering SO and DO's distinct impacts on mortality in middle-aged and older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561424002279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims

Sarcopenic obesity (SO) and dynapenic obesity (DO) represent two manifestations of excessive fat accumulation concurrent with compromised muscle mass and function, thereby necessitating an examination of their implications for health. This study aims to investigate the relationship between SO/DO and mortality, taking into account various adiposity measures and existing sarcopenia criteria, with further stratified analyses based on age and gender.

Methods

The study sample comprised 1779 older adults residing in the community from the I-Lan Longitudinal Aging Study (ILAS). Body composition was assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was adhered to the 2019 consensus of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, while adiposity was measured by waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), and fat percentage. SO/DO was defined as the coexistence of sarcopenia/dynapenia and obesity. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were adopted to examine the association between SO or DO, defined by WC, BMI, fat percentage, and mortality.

Results

This 11-year follow-up study of 1779 participants aged 63.9 ± 9.2 years involved 15,068 person-years and 229 deaths. WC-defined SO (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3, p = 0.021) and WC-defined DO (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1–1.9, p = 0.022) significantly increased mortality risk, whereas definitions employing alternative adiposity metrics exhibited no statistical significance. WC-defined SO was associated with increased risk of mortality among middle-aged adults, while WC-defined DO was associated with increased risk of mortality among older adults. In sex-specific analysis, WC-defined DO was also associated with increased risk of mortality in men (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.4, p = 0.019), while defined by other measurements showed no associations in both sexes.

Conclusions

The study identified a significant link between SO/DO, defined by WC, and an 11-year mortality risk, advocating for WC-defined adiposity as an obesity measure and personalized interventions considering SO and DO's distinct impacts on mortality in middle-aged and older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于不同的脂肪含量指标,肌肉疏松性肥胖和动能性肥胖对中老年人死亡率的不同影响:伊兰纵向老龄化研究的结果。
背景与目的:肌肉疏松性肥胖症(Sarcopenic obesity,SO)和动态性肥胖症(Dynapenic obesity,DO)是脂肪堆积过多同时肌肉质量和功能受损的两种表现形式,因此有必要研究它们对健康的影响。本研究旨在根据不同的脂肪测量方法和现有的肌肉疏松症标准,并进一步根据年龄和性别进行分层分析,探讨SO/DO与死亡率之间的关系:研究样本包括伊兰老龄化纵向研究(ILAS)中居住在社区的 1779 名老年人。身体成分通过双能 X 光吸收测定法进行评估。对 "肌肉疏松症 "的诊断符合亚洲 "肌肉疏松症工作组 "2019 年的共识,而对 "肥胖症 "的测量则采用腰围(WC)、体重指数(BMI)和脂肪百分比。SO/DO被定义为同时存在肌少症/动态肌无力症和肥胖症。采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归模型来研究以腹围、体重指数、脂肪百分比定义的SO或DO与死亡率之间的关系:这项为期 11 年的随访研究有 1779 名参与者参加,年龄为 63.9 ± 9.2 岁,共研究了 15,068 人/年,229 人死亡。WC定义的SO(HR 1.9,95% CI 1.1-3.3,p = 0.021)和WC定义的DO(HR 1.4,95% CI 1.1-1.9,p = 0.022)显著增加了死亡风险,而采用其他脂肪指标的定义则没有统计学意义。WC定义的SO与中年人死亡风险增加有关,而WC定义的DO与老年人死亡风险增加有关。在性别特异性分析中,WC 定义的 DO 也与男性死亡风险增加有关(HR 1.6,95% CI 1.1-2.4,p = 0.019),而根据其他测量方法定义的 DO 在两性中均无相关性:该研究发现,以腹围定义的SO/DO与11年的死亡风险之间存在重要联系,因此主张将以腹围定义的脂肪作为肥胖测量指标,并考虑SO和DO对中老年人死亡率的不同影响,采取个性化干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
期刊最新文献
Skeletal muscle density as a new predictor of abdominal infection in abdominal trauma patients Effectiveness of N-3 fatty acids supplementation on spondyloarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Reply–Letter to the Editor “Rethinking diet and cognitive health: Toward comprehensive methodological improvements” Unveiling the complex interplay between gut microbiota and polycystic ovary syndrome: A narrative review Letter to the editor - “Western diet-induced cognitive and metabolic dysfunctions in aged mice are prevented by rosmarinic acid in a sex-dependent fashion"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1