Prospective feasibility study of a novel rigidizing stabilizing overtube in the resection of complex gastrointestinal polyps.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2350-4059
Salmaan Jawaid, Ahmed F Aboelezz, Gehad Daba, Mai Khalaf, Fares Ayoub, Noor Zabad, Michael Mercado, Tara Keihanian, Mohamed Othman
{"title":"Prospective feasibility study of a novel rigidizing stabilizing overtube in the resection of complex gastrointestinal polyps.","authors":"Salmaan Jawaid, Ahmed F Aboelezz, Gehad Daba, Mai Khalaf, Fares Ayoub, Noor Zabad, Michael Mercado, Tara Keihanian, Mohamed Othman","doi":"10.1055/a-2350-4059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A novel rigidizing overtube (ROT) was developed to facilitate endoscopic removal of complex gastrointestinal polyps. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the device in the management of large gastrointestinal polyps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-center study, conducted between May 2021 and April 2023, enrolled patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colon/duodenal polyps ≥25 mm. Primary outcomes were safety, technical success, and clinical success defined as the ability of ROT to facilitate endoscopic polyp removal without changing the initial resection method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>97 patients (98 polyps), with a mean polyp size of 33.2 mm (median 31.1), were evaluated. Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 84%, respectively. Ileocecal valve location was the only predictor of clinical failure (P = 0.02). The mean time to reach the lesion was 7.2 minutes (95%CI 5-8), with overall resection and procedure times of 53.6 minutes (95%CI 48-61) and 88.9 minutes (95%CI 79-95), respectively. No device-related adverse events occurred. Lower technical (67%) and clinical (67%) success rates were seen for duodenal polyps (n = 6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel ROT was safe, with high technical and clinical success during resection of complex colon polyps. Future studies will determine timing of implementation during routine endoscopic resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11516,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"68-73"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2350-4059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A novel rigidizing overtube (ROT) was developed to facilitate endoscopic removal of complex gastrointestinal polyps. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the device in the management of large gastrointestinal polyps.

Methods: A prospective, single-center study, conducted between May 2021 and April 2023, enrolled patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colon/duodenal polyps ≥25 mm. Primary outcomes were safety, technical success, and clinical success defined as the ability of ROT to facilitate endoscopic polyp removal without changing the initial resection method.

Results: 97 patients (98 polyps), with a mean polyp size of 33.2 mm (median 31.1), were evaluated. Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 84%, respectively. Ileocecal valve location was the only predictor of clinical failure (P = 0.02). The mean time to reach the lesion was 7.2 minutes (95%CI 5-8), with overall resection and procedure times of 53.6 minutes (95%CI 48-61) and 88.9 minutes (95%CI 79-95), respectively. No device-related adverse events occurred. Lower technical (67%) and clinical (67%) success rates were seen for duodenal polyps (n = 6).

Conclusion: The novel ROT was safe, with high technical and clinical success during resection of complex colon polyps. Future studies will determine timing of implementation during routine endoscopic resection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在复杂胃肠道息肉切除术中使用新型硬质稳定套管的前瞻性可行性研究。
背景:为了便于内镜下切除复杂的胃肠道息肉,我们开发了一种新型硬化剂套管(ROT)。我们旨在前瞻性地评估该设备在治疗大型胃肠息肉方面的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性单中心研究于 2021 年 5 月至 2023 年 4 月间进行,招募了接受结肠/十二指肠息肉≥25 毫米内镜切除术的患者。主要结果是安全性、技术成功率和临床成功率,临床成功率是指 ROT 在不改变初始切除方法的情况下促进内镜下息肉切除的能力:共评估了 97 名患者(98 个息肉),息肉平均大小为 33.2 毫米(中位数为 31.1)。技术和临床成功率分别为 100%和 84%。回盲瓣位置是临床失败的唯一预测因素(P = 0.02)。到达病灶的平均时间为 7.2 分钟(95%CI 5-8),总体切除和手术时间分别为 53.6 分钟(95%CI 48-61)和 88.9 分钟(95%CI 79-95)。没有发生与设备相关的不良事件。十二指肠息肉(n = 6)的技术成功率(67%)和临床成功率(67%)较低:结论:新型 ROT 很安全,在切除复杂结肠息肉时技术和临床成功率都很高。未来的研究将确定在常规内镜切除术中实施的时机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy
Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1401
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Endoscopy is a leading journal covering the latest technologies and global advancements in gastrointestinal endoscopy. With guidance from an international editorial board, it delivers high-quality content catering to the needs of endoscopists, surgeons, clinicians, and researchers worldwide. Publishing 12 issues each year, Endoscopy offers top-quality review articles, original contributions, prospective studies, surveys of diagnostic and therapeutic advances, and comprehensive coverage of key national and international meetings. Additionally, articles often include supplementary online video content.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided entero-colostomy with lumen-apposing metal stent as a rescue treatment for malignant intestinal occlusion: a multicenter study. Prospective feasibility study of a novel rigidizing stabilizing overtube in the resection of complex gastrointestinal polyps. Correlation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient measurements with hepatic venous pressure gradient: a prospective study. Predicting ERCP procedure time - the SWedish Estimation of ERCP Time (SWEET) tool. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1