Use of stool color card as screening tool for biliary atresia in resource-constraint country.

Rubaiyat Alam, Khan Lamia Nahid, Md Omar Faruk, Elena Haque Rasna, Md Rukunuzzaman
{"title":"Use of stool color card as screening tool for biliary atresia in resource-constraint country.","authors":"Rubaiyat Alam, Khan Lamia Nahid, Md Omar Faruk, Elena Haque Rasna, Md Rukunuzzaman","doi":"10.22037/ghfbb.v17i2.2931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study was aimed to find out the efficacy of a stool color card (SCC) in differentiating biliary atresia (BA) from non-BA in resource-limited countries.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>stool color screening system was introduced in 2004 which lead to marked improvement in sensitivity of detecting BA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from January, 2019 through July, 2022 on purposively sampled infants who developed jaundice before three months of age, had direct bilirubin of > 20 % of total with pale stool and dark urine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>144 cases (male, 96) were included in the study and their mean age at admission was 87.3±37.2 days and mean age at onset of jaundice was 6.1±7.7 days. BA was confirmed in 106 (73.6%) cases and 38 (26.4%) children were in non-BA group. Frequency of persistent pale stool between BA and non- BA were 88 vs 8 (83.0 % Vs 21.0 %) which was highly significant (p=0.000). Mean difference of total and direct serum bilirubin, median alanine transferase and alkaline phosphatase were not statistically significant between two groups. Median of serum gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) in BA was 570 U/L and in non-BA it was 138.0 U/L which was statistically significant (p=0.000). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of SCC were 83%, 78.9%, 91.7%, 62.5% and 81.9% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCC has good sensitivity to diagnose BA but failed to prove better specificity to rely simply on it. SCC may be used as early screening tool for prompt referral to appropriate medical care centers for final evaluation of BA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12636,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","volume":"17 2","pages":"146-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11234486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v17i2.2931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The study was aimed to find out the efficacy of a stool color card (SCC) in differentiating biliary atresia (BA) from non-BA in resource-limited countries.

Background: stool color screening system was introduced in 2004 which lead to marked improvement in sensitivity of detecting BA.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted from January, 2019 through July, 2022 on purposively sampled infants who developed jaundice before three months of age, had direct bilirubin of > 20 % of total with pale stool and dark urine.

Results: 144 cases (male, 96) were included in the study and their mean age at admission was 87.3±37.2 days and mean age at onset of jaundice was 6.1±7.7 days. BA was confirmed in 106 (73.6%) cases and 38 (26.4%) children were in non-BA group. Frequency of persistent pale stool between BA and non- BA were 88 vs 8 (83.0 % Vs 21.0 %) which was highly significant (p=0.000). Mean difference of total and direct serum bilirubin, median alanine transferase and alkaline phosphatase were not statistically significant between two groups. Median of serum gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) in BA was 570 U/L and in non-BA it was 138.0 U/L which was statistically significant (p=0.000). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of SCC were 83%, 78.9%, 91.7%, 62.5% and 81.9% respectively.

Conclusion: SCC has good sensitivity to diagnose BA but failed to prove better specificity to rely simply on it. SCC may be used as early screening tool for prompt referral to appropriate medical care centers for final evaluation of BA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在资源有限的国家使用粪便色卡作为胆道闭锁的筛查工具。
目的:该研究旨在了解粪便色卡(SCC)在资源有限的国家区分胆道闭锁(BA)和非BA的有效性。背景:2004年引入粪便色卡筛查系统,显著提高了检测BA的灵敏度:这项横断面观察性研究于2019年1月至2022年7月进行,研究对象为特意抽取的3个月大前出现黄疸、直接胆红素>总胆红素的20%、大便颜色浅且尿液颜色深的婴儿:144 例病例(男,96 例)入院时的平均年龄为(87.3±37.2)天,黄疸发病时的平均年龄为(6.1±7.7)天。106例(73.6%)确诊为黄疸型肝炎,38例(26.4%)为非黄疸型肝炎。黄疸型胆汁淤积症与非黄疸型胆汁淤积症患儿大便颜色持续苍白的比例分别为 88 vs 8 (83.0 % vs 21.0 %),差异非常显著(P=0.000)。两组间血清总胆红素和直接胆红素、丙氨酸转移酶和碱性磷酸酶中位数的平均差异无统计学意义。BA 组血清γ谷氨酰转肽酶(GGT)中位数为 570 U/L,非 BA 组为 138.0 U/L,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。SCC的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为83%、78.9%、91.7%、62.5%和81.9%:SCC在诊断BA方面具有良好的灵敏度,但未能证明其具有更好的特异性。SCC可作为早期筛查工具,以便及时转诊到适当的医疗中心,对BA进行最终评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Posterior tibial nerve electrical stimulation in chronic constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Small fiber neuropathy in irritable bowel syndrome. Biguanides and glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists in the amelioration of post liver transplant weight gain; a scoping review of the mechanism of action, safety and efficacy. Design and development of a self-care application for patients with liver cirrhosis. Evaluation strategy of anti-mitochondrial antibodies M2-negative: the role of multiplex rodent tissues and related clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1