Usefulness of modified S-line for upper instrumented vertebra selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 1C curve.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00920-0
Hiroki Oba, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Terue Hatakenaka, Yoshinari Miyaoka, Daisuke Kurogochi, Takuma Fukuzawa, Tetsuhiko Mimura, Shinji Sasao, Makiyama Fumiaki, Michihiko Koseki, Jun Takahashi
{"title":"Usefulness of modified S-line for upper instrumented vertebra selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 1C curve.","authors":"Hiroki Oba, Shota Ikegami, Masashi Uehara, Terue Hatakenaka, Yoshinari Miyaoka, Daisuke Kurogochi, Takuma Fukuzawa, Tetsuhiko Mimura, Shinji Sasao, Makiyama Fumiaki, Michihiko Koseki, Jun Takahashi","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00920-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine the effect of using the modified S-line vertebra (MSLV) as the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on postoperative trunk balance, L4 tilt, and clinical outcomes in selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke type 1C curve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight consecutive patients (all female; mean age: 15.4±2.0 years) with AIS Lenke type 1C curve were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcome measures were coronal balance (absolute distance between C7 and the center of the sacral vertical line), L4 tilt, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r scores at 2 years postoperatively. The group with the MSLV at the UIV was designated as the MSLV group (18 patients), and the group with the MSLV proximal (12 patients) or distal (4 patients) to the UIV was defined as the non-MSLV group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed no significant differences between the groups regarding age, LIV and stable vertebra positioning, or preoperative X-ray parameters. Postoperative coronal balance was significantly better in the MSLV group (0.39±0.08 vs. 1.34±0.22 cm; P.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":"1709-1717"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00920-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Determine the effect of using the modified S-line vertebra (MSLV) as the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on postoperative trunk balance, L4 tilt, and clinical outcomes in selective thoracic fusion (STF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke type 1C curve.

Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients (all female; mean age: 15.4±2.0 years) with AIS Lenke type 1C curve were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcome measures were coronal balance (absolute distance between C7 and the center of the sacral vertical line), L4 tilt, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r scores at 2 years postoperatively. The group with the MSLV at the UIV was designated as the MSLV group (18 patients), and the group with the MSLV proximal (12 patients) or distal (4 patients) to the UIV was defined as the non-MSLV group.

Results: We observed no significant differences between the groups regarding age, LIV and stable vertebra positioning, or preoperative X-ray parameters. Postoperative coronal balance was significantly better in the MSLV group (0.39±0.08 vs. 1.34±0.22 cm; P.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良 S 线对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸 Lenke 1C 型曲线上部器械椎体选择的实用性。
目的:确定使用改良S线椎(MSLV)作为上部器械椎(UIV)对青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)Lenke 1C型曲线选择性胸椎融合术(STF)术后躯干平衡、L4倾斜和临床疗效的影响:回顾性纳入了连续 28 例 AIS Lenke 1C 型脊柱侧弯患者(均为女性;平均年龄:15.4±2.0 岁)。主要结果指标为术后2年的冠状平衡(C7与骶骨垂直线中心的绝对距离)、L4倾斜度和脊柱侧弯研究学会(SRS)-22r评分。MSLV位于UIV的一组被称为MSLV组(18名患者),MSLV位于UIV近端(12名患者)或远端(4名患者)的一组被称为非MSLV组:我们观察到两组患者在年龄、LIV和稳定椎体位置以及术前X光参数方面无明显差异。MSLV组的术后冠状面平衡明显更好(0.39±0.08 cm vs. 1.34±0.22 cm; P.)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
Making wrong site surgery a "never event" in spinal deformity surgery by use of a "landmark vertebra" to eliminate variability in identifying a target vertebral level. Magnetically controlled growing rods increase 3D true spine length in idiopathic early onset scoliosis patients: results from a multicenter study. Factors contributing to severe scoliosis after open chest surgery for congenital heart disease: a case-control analysis. Zones where reduced implant density leads to correction loss after scoliosis surgery for Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study. Learning curve and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1