Adaptive robotic system for the inspection of aerospace slat actuator mount.

IF 2.9 Q2 ROBOTICS Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2024.1423319
Nour M Morsi, Mario Mata, Colin S Harrison, David Semple
{"title":"Adaptive robotic system for the inspection of aerospace slat actuator mount.","authors":"Nour M Morsi, Mario Mata, Colin S Harrison, David Semple","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1423319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Robotics uptake in the aerospace industry is low, mainly due to the low-volume/high-accuracy production that aerospace manufacturers require. Furthermore, aerospace manufacturing and assembly sites are often unstructured environments not specifically suitable for robots to operate in. <b>Methods:</b> This paper introduces a robotic visual inspection system using off-the-shelf components able to inspect the mounting holes for wing slat actuators without the need for fixed-coordinate programming; the part just needs to be left within reach of the robot. Our system sets one of the opposed pairs of mounting holes as a reference (the \"datum\") and then compares the tilt of all other pairs of mounting holes with respect to it. Under the assumption that any deviation in the mounting hole tilt is not systematic but due to normal manufacturing tolerances, our system will either guarantee the correct alignment of all mounting holes or highlight the existence of misaligned holes. <b>Results and Discussion:</b> Computer-vision tilt measurements are performed with an error of below 0.03° using custom optimization for the sub-pixel determination of the center and radius of the mounting holes. The error introduced by the robot's motion from the datum to each of the remaining hole pairs is compensated by moving back to the datum and fixing the orientation again before moving to inspect the next hole pair. This error is estimated to be approximately 0.05°, taking the total tilt error estimation for any mounting hole pair to be 0.08° with respect to the datum. This is confirmed by manually measuring the tilt of the hole pairs using a clock gauge on a calibrated table (not used during normal operation).</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1423319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Robotics uptake in the aerospace industry is low, mainly due to the low-volume/high-accuracy production that aerospace manufacturers require. Furthermore, aerospace manufacturing and assembly sites are often unstructured environments not specifically suitable for robots to operate in. Methods: This paper introduces a robotic visual inspection system using off-the-shelf components able to inspect the mounting holes for wing slat actuators without the need for fixed-coordinate programming; the part just needs to be left within reach of the robot. Our system sets one of the opposed pairs of mounting holes as a reference (the "datum") and then compares the tilt of all other pairs of mounting holes with respect to it. Under the assumption that any deviation in the mounting hole tilt is not systematic but due to normal manufacturing tolerances, our system will either guarantee the correct alignment of all mounting holes or highlight the existence of misaligned holes. Results and Discussion: Computer-vision tilt measurements are performed with an error of below 0.03° using custom optimization for the sub-pixel determination of the center and radius of the mounting holes. The error introduced by the robot's motion from the datum to each of the remaining hole pairs is compensated by moving back to the datum and fixing the orientation again before moving to inspect the next hole pair. This error is estimated to be approximately 0.05°, taking the total tilt error estimation for any mounting hole pair to be 0.08° with respect to the datum. This is confirmed by manually measuring the tilt of the hole pairs using a clock gauge on a calibrated table (not used during normal operation).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自适应机器人系统,用于检测航空板条致动器支架。
导言:航空航天业对机器人的使用率很低,这主要是由于航空航天制造商需要低产量/高精度的生产。此外,航空航天制造和装配现场通常是非结构化的环境,并不特别适合机器人操作。方法:本文介绍了一种使用现成组件的机器人视觉检测系统,该系统能够检测机翼板条致动器的安装孔,无需进行固定坐标编程;只需将零件放在机器人可触及的范围内即可。我们的系统将一对相对的安装孔中的一个设置为基准("基准"),然后比较所有其他安装孔的倾斜度。假设安装孔倾斜度的任何偏差都不是系统性的,而是由于正常的制造公差造成的,那么我们的系统要么能保证所有安装孔正确对齐,要么能突出显示存在错位的安装孔。结果与讨论:计算机视觉倾斜测量的误差低于 0.03°,采用定制优化方法确定安装孔的中心和半径。机器人从基准点移动到其余各孔对时产生的误差,可通过移动回基准点并在移动到下一个孔对之前再次固定方向来补偿。这个误差估计约为 0.05°,因此任何安装孔对的总倾斜误差估计为 0.08°。这一点可以通过在校准过的工作台上使用钟表规手动测量孔对的倾斜度来确认(正常运行时不使用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
期刊最新文献
Cybernic robot hand-arm that realizes cooperative work as a new hand-arm for people with a single upper-limb dysfunction. Advancements in the use of AI in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Remote science at sea with remotely operated vehicles. A pipeline for estimating human attention toward objects with on-board cameras on the iCub humanoid robot. Leveraging imitation learning in agricultural robotics: a comprehensive survey and comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1