Uveal melanoma distant metastasis prediction system: A retrospective observational study based on machine learning

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Science Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1111/cas.16276
Shi-Nan Wu, Dan-Yi Qin, Linfangzi Zhu, Shu-Jia Guo, Xiang Li, Cai-Hong Huang, Jiaoyue Hu, Zuguo Liu
{"title":"Uveal melanoma distant metastasis prediction system: A retrospective observational study based on machine learning","authors":"Shi-Nan Wu,&nbsp;Dan-Yi Qin,&nbsp;Linfangzi Zhu,&nbsp;Shu-Jia Guo,&nbsp;Xiang Li,&nbsp;Cai-Hong Huang,&nbsp;Jiaoyue Hu,&nbsp;Zuguo Liu","doi":"10.1111/cas.16276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Uveal melanoma (UM) patients face a significant risk of distant metastasis, closely tied to a poor prognosis. Despite this, there is a dearth of research utilizing big data to predict UM distant metastasis. This study leveraged machine learning methods on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to forecast the risk probability of distant metastasis. Therefore, the information on UM patients from the SEER database (2000–2020) was split into a 7:3 ratio training set and an internal test set based on distant metastasis presence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed distant metastasis risk factors. Six machine learning methods constructed a predictive model post-feature variable selection. The model evaluation identified the multilayer perceptron (MLP) as optimal. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) interpreted the chosen model. A web-based calculator personalized risk probabilities for UM patients. The results show that nine feature variables contributed to the machine learning model. The MLP model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (Precision = 0.788; ROC AUC = 0.876; PR AUC = 0.788). Grade recode, age, primary site, time from diagnosis to treatment initiation, and total number of malignant tumors were identified as distant metastasis risk factors. Diagnostic method, laterality, rural–urban continuum code, and radiation recode emerged as protective factors. The developed web calculator utilizes the MLP model for personalized risk assessments. In conclusion, the MLP machine learning model emerges as the optimal tool for predicting distant metastasis in UM patients. This model facilitates personalized risk assessments, empowering early and tailored treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":"115 9","pages":"3107-3126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cas.16276","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.16276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) patients face a significant risk of distant metastasis, closely tied to a poor prognosis. Despite this, there is a dearth of research utilizing big data to predict UM distant metastasis. This study leveraged machine learning methods on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to forecast the risk probability of distant metastasis. Therefore, the information on UM patients from the SEER database (2000–2020) was split into a 7:3 ratio training set and an internal test set based on distant metastasis presence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed distant metastasis risk factors. Six machine learning methods constructed a predictive model post-feature variable selection. The model evaluation identified the multilayer perceptron (MLP) as optimal. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) interpreted the chosen model. A web-based calculator personalized risk probabilities for UM patients. The results show that nine feature variables contributed to the machine learning model. The MLP model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (Precision = 0.788; ROC AUC = 0.876; PR AUC = 0.788). Grade recode, age, primary site, time from diagnosis to treatment initiation, and total number of malignant tumors were identified as distant metastasis risk factors. Diagnostic method, laterality, rural–urban continuum code, and radiation recode emerged as protective factors. The developed web calculator utilizes the MLP model for personalized risk assessments. In conclusion, the MLP machine learning model emerges as the optimal tool for predicting distant metastasis in UM patients. This model facilitates personalized risk assessments, empowering early and tailored treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄膜黑色素瘤远处转移预测系统:基于机器学习的回顾性观察研究
葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)患者面临很大的远处转移风险,这与预后不良密切相关。尽管如此,利用大数据预测UM远处转移的研究还很缺乏。本研究利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的机器学习方法来预测远处转移的风险概率。因此,SEER 数据库(2000-2020 年)中的 UM 患者信息被分成了 7:3 比例的训练集和基于远处转移存在的内部测试集。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析评估了远处转移风险因素。特征变量选择后,六种机器学习方法构建了预测模型。模型评估确定多层感知器(MLP)为最优。夏普利加法解释(SHAP)对所选模型进行了解释。基于网络的计算器为铀矿病患者提供了个性化的风险概率。结果显示,九个特征变量对机器学习模型做出了贡献。MLP 模型显示出更高的预测准确性(精确度 = 0.788;ROC AUC = 0.876;PR AUC = 0.788)。分级重新编码、年龄、原发部位、从诊断到开始治疗的时间以及恶性肿瘤总数被确定为远处转移风险因素。诊断方法、侧位、城乡连续编码和辐射重新编码成为保护因素。开发的网络计算器利用 MLP 模型进行个性化风险评估。总之,MLP 机器学习模型是预测 UM 患者远处转移的最佳工具。该模型有助于进行个性化风险评估,从而制定早期和有针对性的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science 医学-肿瘤学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information In this issue Issue Information In this issue Real-world genome profiling in Japanese patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma focusing on HRD implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1