Clinical skills examination as part of the Swedish proficiency test of dentists educated outside of the EU/EEA

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1111/eje.13022
Jesper Dalum, Nikolaos Christidis, Henrike Häbel, Klas Karlgren, Charlotte Leanderson, Gunilla Sandborgh Englund
{"title":"Clinical skills examination as part of the Swedish proficiency test of dentists educated outside of the EU/EEA","authors":"Jesper Dalum,&nbsp;Nikolaos Christidis,&nbsp;Henrike Häbel,&nbsp;Klas Karlgren,&nbsp;Charlotte Leanderson,&nbsp;Gunilla Sandborgh Englund","doi":"10.1111/eje.13022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The increase in the migration of dentists educated outside the EU/EEA calls for the sharing of information and evaluation of recognition processes within countries in the EU. In 2017, the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare implemented the <i>Proficiency test</i>, a recognition process for dentists who have completed an education programme outside the EU/EEA. The <i>Proficiency test</i> consists of a theoretical and an integrated clinical skills examination, followed by a 6-month clinical practice. The clinical skills examination is a two-part examination that includes an OSCE and an operative test on a dental manikin. This paper presents data from proficiency tests between 2018 and 2022, and explores factors related to grade fail, that is, demographics, theoretical exam scores and language comprehension.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a cohort study, demographics and factors associated with grade fail were explored using test results from theoretical and clinical skills examinations (<i>n</i> = 181) from 2018 to 2022. Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis were used for studying correlations and associations between exam results. Univariable linear and logistic regression models were used for background variable associations with clinical skills exam outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Higher age was a significant risk factor for failing the clinical skills examination and the OSCE. Higher scores in the theoretical exam reduced the odds of failing the OSCE but were not associated with results in the operative test or the overall results of the clinical skills examination. Regarding the OSCE there was a statistically significant difference within all professional qualifications explored between participants who passed and participants who failed the OSCE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Four years of data collection reveal that age and previous theoretical exam results influence the odds of failing the clinical examination. The study results also highlight the necessity of multiple assessment formats to assess clinical and communication skills of foreign-trained dentists.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"28 4","pages":"880-888"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eje.13022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.13022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The increase in the migration of dentists educated outside the EU/EEA calls for the sharing of information and evaluation of recognition processes within countries in the EU. In 2017, the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare implemented the Proficiency test, a recognition process for dentists who have completed an education programme outside the EU/EEA. The Proficiency test consists of a theoretical and an integrated clinical skills examination, followed by a 6-month clinical practice. The clinical skills examination is a two-part examination that includes an OSCE and an operative test on a dental manikin. This paper presents data from proficiency tests between 2018 and 2022, and explores factors related to grade fail, that is, demographics, theoretical exam scores and language comprehension.

Materials and Methods

In a cohort study, demographics and factors associated with grade fail were explored using test results from theoretical and clinical skills examinations (n = 181) from 2018 to 2022. Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis were used for studying correlations and associations between exam results. Univariable linear and logistic regression models were used for background variable associations with clinical skills exam outcomes.

Results

Higher age was a significant risk factor for failing the clinical skills examination and the OSCE. Higher scores in the theoretical exam reduced the odds of failing the OSCE but were not associated with results in the operative test or the overall results of the clinical skills examination. Regarding the OSCE there was a statistically significant difference within all professional qualifications explored between participants who passed and participants who failed the OSCE.

Conclusions

Four years of data collection reveal that age and previous theoretical exam results influence the odds of failing the clinical examination. The study results also highlight the necessity of multiple assessment formats to assess clinical and communication skills of foreign-trained dentists.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床技能考试是瑞典对在欧盟/欧洲经济区以外接受教育的牙医进行的能力测试的一部分。
引言:在欧盟/欧洲经济区以外接受教育的牙医移民人数增加,这就要求在欧盟国家内共享信息和评估认可程序。2017 年,瑞典国家卫生与福利委员会实施了能力测试,这是对在欧盟/欧洲经济区以外完成教育课程的牙医的一种认可程序。水平测试包括理论考试和综合临床技能考试,之后是为期 6 个月的临床实践。临床技能考试由两部分组成,包括开放式口腔操作考试和牙科人体模型操作考试。本文介绍了2018年至2022年间的能力测试数据,并探讨了与成绩不及格相关的因素,即人口统计学、理论考试成绩和语言理解能力:在一项队列研究中,利用2018年至2022年理论和临床技能考试的测试结果(n = 181),探讨了人口统计学和与成绩不及格相关的因素。采用皮尔逊相关系数和线性回归分析来研究考试成绩之间的相关性和关联性。单变量线性回归和逻辑回归模型用于研究背景变量与临床技能考试结果之间的关联:结果:年龄越大,临床技能考试和 OSCE 不及格的风险越高。理论考试成绩越高,OSCE考试不及格的几率越小,但与手术考试成绩或临床技能考试总成绩无关。在所有专业资格考试中,通过 OSCE 考试的学员与未通过 OSCE 考试的学员之间存在显著的统计学差异:四年的数据收集显示,年龄和之前的理论考试成绩会影响临床考试不及格的几率。研究结果还凸显了采用多种评估形式来评估外国受训牙医的临床和交流技能的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Graduating European Dentist Curriculum Framework: A 7-Year Review. Beyond the Drill: Understanding Empathy Among Undergraduate Dental Students. Future-Proofing Dentistry: A Qualitative Exploration of COVID-19 Responses in UK Dental Schools. Mapping the Landscape of Generative Language Models in Dental Education: A Comparison Between ChatGPT and Google Bard. Performance of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer in Generating Scientific Abstracts in Dentistry: A Comparative Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1