Healthcare Professionals and Extreme Risk Protection Orders: A Concise Review.

Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000802
Lisa C Lindley, Lora Humphrey Beebe, Heather A Davis, Christina N Policastro, Radion Svynarenko
{"title":"Healthcare Professionals and Extreme Risk Protection Orders: A Concise Review.","authors":"Lisa C Lindley, Lora Humphrey Beebe, Heather A Davis, Christina N Policastro, Radion Svynarenko","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are one policy mechanism to address the critical public health problem of gun violence. The inclusion of healthcare professionals with ERPOs is a promising approach to expanding ERPO utilization, yet early evidence has not been examined.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to synthesize the current research on healthcare professionals and ERPOs.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Academic Search Complete, and Web of Science were searched.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies examined healthcare professionals' role and function within the context of ERPOs.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Relevant studies were reviewed and included through consensus of the authors. Data extracted included authors, objective, design, states, healthcare professional type, mental health professional type, healthcare professional roles/involvement and key outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>There is unfamiliarity with ERPOs among healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals lack ERPO knowledge and are unclear about ethical and legal ERPO liability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The available evidence suggests that healthcare professionals have an important role in ERPOs, but critical gaps in ERPO knowledge, training/resources, and liability will limit use and effectiveness of healthcare professionals, including nurses, in the role of ERPO petitioner.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"31 4","pages":"224-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are one policy mechanism to address the critical public health problem of gun violence. The inclusion of healthcare professionals with ERPOs is a promising approach to expanding ERPO utilization, yet early evidence has not been examined.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to synthesize the current research on healthcare professionals and ERPOs.

Data sources: Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Academic Search Complete, and Web of Science were searched.

Study selection: Studies examined healthcare professionals' role and function within the context of ERPOs.

Data extraction: Relevant studies were reviewed and included through consensus of the authors. Data extracted included authors, objective, design, states, healthcare professional type, mental health professional type, healthcare professional roles/involvement and key outcomes.

Data synthesis: There is unfamiliarity with ERPOs among healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals lack ERPO knowledge and are unclear about ethical and legal ERPO liability.

Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that healthcare professionals have an important role in ERPOs, but critical gaps in ERPO knowledge, training/resources, and liability will limit use and effectiveness of healthcare professionals, including nurses, in the role of ERPO petitioner.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
医疗保健专业人员和极端风险保护令:简明评论。
背景:极度危险保护令(ERPO)是解决枪支暴力这一严重公共卫生问题的政策机制之一。将医疗保健专业人员纳入ERPO是扩大ERPO使用范围的一个很有前景的方法,但尚未对早期证据进行研究:本研究的目的是综合目前有关医护专业人员和 ERPOs 的研究:数据来源:检索了《护理和专职医疗文献累积索引》(CINAHL)、PubMed、Academic Search Complete 和 Web of Science:数据提取:数据提取:对相关研究进行审查,并经作者协商一致后纳入。提取的数据包括作者、目的、设计、状态、医疗保健专业人员类型、精神健康专业人员类型、医疗保健专业人员的角色/参与以及主要结果:医护人员对ERPO并不熟悉。医护人员缺乏ERPO知识,对ERPO的伦理和法律责任也不清楚:现有证据表明,医护专业人员在ERPO中扮演着重要角色,但在ERPO知识、培训/资源和责任方面的关键差距将限制包括护士在内的医护专业人员在ERPO申请人角色中的使用和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1