Effectiveness and safety profile of introducing less invasive surfactant administration in management of respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary neonatal unit in Hong Kong.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Pediatrics and Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.12.013
Wing Kan Julianna Bao, Qi Feng, King Shun Liu, Yok Chiu Ho
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety profile of introducing less invasive surfactant administration in management of respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study in a tertiary neonatal unit in Hong Kong.","authors":"Wing Kan Julianna Bao, Qi Feng, King Shun Liu, Yok Chiu Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.12.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of introducing less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for management of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study identifying preterm neonates with RDS born between 2017 and 2022 in a tertiary neonatal unit, where LISA was introduced in January 2020. Time trend analysis comparing cohort of neonates born before (2017-2020) and after LISA introduction (2020-2022) was performed. The primary outcomes were incidence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the association between introducing LISA to RDS management and health and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 261 neonates with RDS were included (114 born after LISA was introduced). Neonates receiving invasive surfactant administration had lower gestational age, birth weight, lower Apgar scores, and higher oxygen requirement, compared to those receiving LISA. In the time trend analysis, introduction of LISA was associated with lower incidence of BPD (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.34 (0.16, 0.72)), and lower severity of BPD (0.31 (0.16, 0.59)). Pre- and post-LISA period showed similar treatment safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Introduction of LISA was associated with improved prognosis in neonates with RDS in Hong Kong.</p>","PeriodicalId":56095,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics and Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics and Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.12.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of introducing less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for management of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study identifying preterm neonates with RDS born between 2017 and 2022 in a tertiary neonatal unit, where LISA was introduced in January 2020. Time trend analysis comparing cohort of neonates born before (2017-2020) and after LISA introduction (2020-2022) was performed. The primary outcomes were incidence and severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the association between introducing LISA to RDS management and health and safety outcomes.

Results: In total, 261 neonates with RDS were included (114 born after LISA was introduced). Neonates receiving invasive surfactant administration had lower gestational age, birth weight, lower Apgar scores, and higher oxygen requirement, compared to those receiving LISA. In the time trend analysis, introduction of LISA was associated with lower incidence of BPD (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.34 (0.16, 0.72)), and lower severity of BPD (0.31 (0.16, 0.59)). Pre- and post-LISA period showed similar treatment safety profiles.

Conclusion: Introduction of LISA was associated with improved prognosis in neonates with RDS in Hong Kong.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗中引入微创表面活性物质的有效性和安全性:香港一家三级医院新生儿科的回顾性队列研究。
背景:目的是评估采用微创表面活化剂给药(LISA)治疗呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的疗效:目的:评估对患有呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产新生儿采用微创表面活化剂给药(LISA)的疗效:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2017年至2022年期间在一家三级新生儿病房出生的RDS早产新生儿,该病房于2020年1月引入了LISA。对 LISA 引入前(2017-2020 年)和引入后(2020-2022 年)出生的新生儿队列进行了时间趋势分析比较。主要结果是支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的发病率和严重程度。多变量回归模型用于估算在 RDS 管理中引入 LISA 与健康和安全结果之间的关联:共纳入了 261 名患有 RDS 的新生儿(其中 114 名是在引入 LISA 后出生的)。与接受 LISA 治疗的新生儿相比,接受侵入性表面活性物质治疗的新生儿胎龄、出生体重较低,Apgar 评分较低,需氧量较高。在时间趋势分析中,引入 LISA 与 BPD 发生率降低(几率比(95% 置信区间)为 0.34 (0.16, 0.72))和 BPD 严重程度降低(0.31 (0.16, 0.59))有关。LISA前后的治疗安全性相似:结论:LISA的引入改善了香港RDS新生儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Pediatrics and Neonatology is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Pediatric Association and The Society of Neonatology ROC, and is indexed in EMBASE and SCOPUS. Articles on clinical and laboratory research in pediatrics and related fields are eligible for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Clinical features of atypical solid-type congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) type 1. Clinical course and management of pediatric gastroduodenal perforation beyond neonatal period. Perinatal risk factors and outcomes of pulmonary air leak in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: A multicenter registry study in Taiwan. Recurrent Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: Neonatal age and pyloric canal length as risk factors. A retrospective analysis of tacrolimus pharmacokinetic in Saudi paediatric patients in early post-liver transplantation period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1