Evaluation of field epidemiology training programs: a scoping review.

Frontiers in epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-06-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fepid.2024.1376071
Mohannad Al Nsour, Ghena Khasawneh, Yousef Khader, Haitham Bashier
{"title":"Evaluation of field epidemiology training programs: a scoping review.","authors":"Mohannad Al Nsour, Ghena Khasawneh, Yousef Khader, Haitham Bashier","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2024.1376071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETPs) are competency-based training programs that play a critical role in strengthening global health security and enhancing the epidemiological capabilities of public health professionals. This scoping review examined available published literature on the evaluations of FETPs globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted to evaluate FETPs globally. Keywords specific to the evaluation of FETPs were utilized to search the PubMed, Scopus, and Web Science databases. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 relevant studies from an initial pool of 60 were included in this study. Data extraction included key details, and a qualitative synthesis organized diverse findings using a narrative approach to draw appropriate conclusions and generate recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review covered findings from 12 studies covering all three FETP modalities and spanning countries in various regions. Evaluations explored gained skills, engagement in FETP activities, and improvements in field epidemiological functions. Gained skills and knowledge, engagement in FETP activities, and improvements in field epidemiological functions were evident, with specific expectations for each FETP tier. Positive outcomes were consistent across studies, revealing improvements in surveillance activities, outbreak response, data management, and other system functions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review confirmed the positive impact of FETPs on trainees and graduates, which emphasized competency enhancements across different modalities. Various strategies are recommended to improve the evaluation of FETPs. For effective evaluation, it is necessary to develop robust evaluation tools and establish standardized metrics to compare FETPs across regions or countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1376071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2024.1376071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Field Epidemiology Training Programs (FETPs) are competency-based training programs that play a critical role in strengthening global health security and enhancing the epidemiological capabilities of public health professionals. This scoping review examined available published literature on the evaluations of FETPs globally.

Methods: A literature review was conducted to evaluate FETPs globally. Keywords specific to the evaluation of FETPs were utilized to search the PubMed, Scopus, and Web Science databases. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 relevant studies from an initial pool of 60 were included in this study. Data extraction included key details, and a qualitative synthesis organized diverse findings using a narrative approach to draw appropriate conclusions and generate recommendations.

Results: The review covered findings from 12 studies covering all three FETP modalities and spanning countries in various regions. Evaluations explored gained skills, engagement in FETP activities, and improvements in field epidemiological functions. Gained skills and knowledge, engagement in FETP activities, and improvements in field epidemiological functions were evident, with specific expectations for each FETP tier. Positive outcomes were consistent across studies, revealing improvements in surveillance activities, outbreak response, data management, and other system functions.

Conclusion: This review confirmed the positive impact of FETPs on trainees and graduates, which emphasized competency enhancements across different modalities. Various strategies are recommended to improve the evaluation of FETPs. For effective evaluation, it is necessary to develop robust evaluation tools and establish standardized metrics to compare FETPs across regions or countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实地流行病学培训项目评估:范围界定审查。
目标:野外流行病学培训计划 (FETP) 是以能力为基础的培训计划,在加强全球卫生安全和提高公共卫生专业人员的流行病学能力方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本范围界定综述研究了全球范围内已发表的有关野外流行病学培训项目评估的文献:方法:对全球范围内的 FETPs 评估进行了文献综述。利用与 FETP 评估相关的关键词在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web Science 数据库中进行搜索。在应用纳入和排除标准后,本研究从最初的 60 项研究中筛选出 12 项相关研究。数据提取包括关键细节,定性综合采用叙事方法整理了不同的研究结果,以得出适当的结论并提出建议:审查涵盖了 12 项研究的结果,涵盖了所有三种 FETP 模式,跨越了不同地区的国家。评估探讨了获得的技能、参与 FETP 活动的情况以及实地流行病学职能的改善情况。获得的技能和知识、对 FETP 活动的参与以及实地流行病学职能的改善是显而易见的,对每一级 FETP 都有具体的期望。各项研究的积极成果是一致的,显示了监测活动、疫情应对、数据管理和其他系统功能的改善:本综述证实了 FETP 对学员和毕业生的积极影响,强调了不同模式下能力的提高。建议采取各种策略来改进对 FETPs 的评估。为了进行有效的评估,有必要开发强有力的评估工具,并建立标准化的衡量标准,以便在不同地区或国家之间对继续教育与培训项目进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of cognitive bias about infectious diseases on social well-being. The spatio-temporal evolution of leishmaniasis in the province of Essaouira. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated factors among adult diabetic patients: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Using a computational cognitive model to simulate the effects of personal and social network experiences on seasonal influenza vaccination decisions. Prevalence of occupational injuries and associated factors among solid waste collectors in Jigjiga city, eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1