Outcomes of kidneys used for transplantation: an analysis of survival and function.

Frontiers in transplantation Pub Date : 2024-03-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frtra.2024.1335999
Timothy L Pruett, Paola Martin, Diwakar Gupta
{"title":"Outcomes of kidneys used for transplantation: an analysis of survival and function.","authors":"Timothy L Pruett, Paola Martin, Diwakar Gupta","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2024.1335999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients expect to survive the procedure with sufficient renal function for reliable dialysis freedom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transplant outcomes (survival and estimated renal function) were assessed after live and deceased donor transplantation from the US national database. Outcomes were stratified by age (donor and recipient) and donor type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aggregate recipient outcomes were better transplanting living vs deceased donated kidneys. However, when stratified by the one-year renal function (within KDIGO CKD stage stratifications), surviving recipients had clinically similar dialysis-freedom, irrespective of donor type or age. The major outcome differences for recipients of age-stratified live and deceased kidneys was 1) the increasing frequency of one-year graft failures and 2) the increasing likelihood of severely limited renal function (CKD 4/5) with advancing donor age. Over 30% of recipients of deceased kidneys >65 years had either one-year graft failure or severely limited renal function contrasted to less than 15% of recipients of live kidneys aged >65 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evolving techniques to reduce adverse events after urgent vs elective procedures, plus improved transplant outcome predictability with increased-age deceased donor kidneys using advanced predictive analytics (using age-stratified live kidney transplantation outcomes as a relevant reference point) should facilitate similar kidney transplant outcomes, irrespective of donor type.</p>","PeriodicalId":519976,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1335999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney transplant recipients expect to survive the procedure with sufficient renal function for reliable dialysis freedom.

Methods: Transplant outcomes (survival and estimated renal function) were assessed after live and deceased donor transplantation from the US national database. Outcomes were stratified by age (donor and recipient) and donor type.

Results: Aggregate recipient outcomes were better transplanting living vs deceased donated kidneys. However, when stratified by the one-year renal function (within KDIGO CKD stage stratifications), surviving recipients had clinically similar dialysis-freedom, irrespective of donor type or age. The major outcome differences for recipients of age-stratified live and deceased kidneys was 1) the increasing frequency of one-year graft failures and 2) the increasing likelihood of severely limited renal function (CKD 4/5) with advancing donor age. Over 30% of recipients of deceased kidneys >65 years had either one-year graft failure or severely limited renal function contrasted to less than 15% of recipients of live kidneys aged >65 years.

Conclusions: Evolving techniques to reduce adverse events after urgent vs elective procedures, plus improved transplant outcome predictability with increased-age deceased donor kidneys using advanced predictive analytics (using age-stratified live kidney transplantation outcomes as a relevant reference point) should facilitate similar kidney transplant outcomes, irrespective of donor type.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于移植的肾脏的结果:存活率和功能分析。
导言:肾移植受者希望在移植过程中能够存活下来,并拥有足够的肾功能,以便能够可靠地摆脱透析:从美国国家数据库中评估了活体和死亡供体移植后的移植结果(存活率和估计肾功能)。根据年龄(供体和受体)和供体类型对结果进行分层:结果:活体与死亡捐献肾脏移植的受体总体结果更好。然而,如果按一年肾功能分层(在 KDIGO CKD 分期分层范围内),存活受者的临床透析自由度相似,与供体类型或年龄无关。按年龄分层的活体肾脏和死亡肾脏受者的主要结果差异在于:1)一年移植失败的频率增加;2)随着供体年龄的增加,肾功能严重受限(CKD 4/5)的可能性增加。在年龄大于65岁的已故肾脏受体中,超过30%的受体出现一年移植失败或肾功能严重受限,而在年龄大于65岁的活体肾脏受体中,这一比例不到15%:结论:不断发展的技术可减少紧急手术与选择性手术后的不良事件,再加上利用先进的预测分析技术(将年龄分层的活体肾移植结果作为相关参考点)提高了高龄死亡供体肾脏的移植结果预测能力,这应有助于实现相似的肾移植结果,而与供体类型无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic subclasses differentially perturb the gut microbiota in kidney transplant recipients. Walter Brendel and the dawn of transplantation research in Germany. Propionic acid supplementation promotes the expansion of regulatory T cells in patients with end-stage renal disease but not in renal transplant patients. Impact of donor transaminases on liver transplant utilisation and unnecessary organ discard: national registry cohort study. The role of C4d and donor specific antibodies in face and hand transplantation-a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1