Navigating challenges and opportunities: Nursing student's views on generative AI in higher education

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104062
Anthony Summers , May El Haddad , Roslyn Prichard , Karen-Ann Clarke , Joanne Lee , Florin Oprescu
{"title":"Navigating challenges and opportunities: Nursing student's views on generative AI in higher education","authors":"Anthony Summers ,&nbsp;May El Haddad ,&nbsp;Roslyn Prichard ,&nbsp;Karen-Ann Clarke ,&nbsp;Joanne Lee ,&nbsp;Florin Oprescu","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This qualitative study aims to explore the perspectives of nursing students regarding the application and integration of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their studies.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the increasing prevalence of generative AI tools in academic settings, there is a growing interest in their use among students for learning and assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Employing a qualitative descriptive design, this study used semi-structured interviews with nursing students to capture the nuanced insights of the participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews were digitally recorded and then transcribed verbatim. The research team reviewed all the data independently and then convened to discuss and reach a consensus on the identified themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study was conducted within the discipline of nursing at a regional Australian university. Thirteen nursing students, from both first and second year of the programme, were interviewed as part of this study. Six distinct themes emerged from the data analysis, including the educational impact of AI tools, equitable learning environment, ethical considerations of AI use, technology integration, safe and practical utility and generational differences.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This initial exploration sheds light on the diverse perspectives of nursing students concerning the incorporation of generative AI tools in their education. It underscores the potential for both positive contributions and challenges associated with the integration of generative AI in nursing education and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This qualitative study aims to explore the perspectives of nursing students regarding the application and integration of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their studies.

Background

With the increasing prevalence of generative AI tools in academic settings, there is a growing interest in their use among students for learning and assessments.

Design

Employing a qualitative descriptive design, this study used semi-structured interviews with nursing students to capture the nuanced insights of the participants.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were digitally recorded and then transcribed verbatim. The research team reviewed all the data independently and then convened to discuss and reach a consensus on the identified themes.

Results

This study was conducted within the discipline of nursing at a regional Australian university. Thirteen nursing students, from both first and second year of the programme, were interviewed as part of this study. Six distinct themes emerged from the data analysis, including the educational impact of AI tools, equitable learning environment, ethical considerations of AI use, technology integration, safe and practical utility and generational differences.

Conclusions

This initial exploration sheds light on the diverse perspectives of nursing students concerning the incorporation of generative AI tools in their education. It underscores the potential for both positive contributions and challenges associated with the integration of generative AI in nursing education and practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战与机遇并存:护理专业学生对高等教育中生成式人工智能的看法
背景随着生成式人工智能工具在学术环境中的日益普及,学生们对使用这些工具进行学习和评估的兴趣也与日俱增。设计本研究采用定性描述设计,对护理专业学生进行半结构化访谈,以捕捉参与者细微的见解。研究小组独立审查了所有数据,然后召开会议进行讨论,并就确定的主题达成共识。作为研究的一部分,13 名护理专业的一年级和二年级学生接受了访谈。通过数据分析,我们发现了六个不同的主题,包括人工智能工具对教育的影响、公平的学习环境、人工智能使用的伦理考虑、技术整合、安全实用性和代际差异。它强调了将生成式人工智能融入护理教育和实践的潜在积极贡献和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1