Quantifying damage zones width in strike-slip faults: Insights from a two-dimensional finite-element modeling approach

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Structural Geology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105201
T.A. Silva , I.F. Gomes , T.S. Miranda , O.J. Correia Filho , C.E.B. Medeiros , B.R.B.M. Carvalho , M.P. Cordão Neto , L.J.N. Guimarães , J.A. Barbosa , J.A.B. Souza , T.C. Falcão
{"title":"Quantifying damage zones width in strike-slip faults: Insights from a two-dimensional finite-element modeling approach","authors":"T.A. Silva ,&nbsp;I.F. Gomes ,&nbsp;T.S. Miranda ,&nbsp;O.J. Correia Filho ,&nbsp;C.E.B. Medeiros ,&nbsp;B.R.B.M. Carvalho ,&nbsp;M.P. Cordão Neto ,&nbsp;L.J.N. Guimarães ,&nbsp;J.A. Barbosa ,&nbsp;J.A.B. Souza ,&nbsp;T.C. Falcão","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We use a two-dimensional finite-element modeling approach to investigate the structural evolution of strike-slip faults under five different confining pressures and determine how their damage zone widths vary depending on the kinematic. Three representative fault segments are modeled, accounting for movement obliquity forming in pure strike-slip, oblique convergence and oblique divergence scenarios. The elastoplastic constitutive model (Drucker-Prager) was employed to couple an associated flow rule into the initial stress state of a geostatic stage. We applied two empirical methods for determining the width of the damage zone from progressive model response. The first method involves using the plastic strain distribution curve's inflection points, to mathematically fixate the width. The second method uses the standard deviation obtained from a trend Gaussian/Normal probability distribution, with over 98% fit to the plastic strain curve data, simplifying the inference of the strain propagation along the model. The simulation results indicate inverse proportional relationships between confining pressure and both porosity and plastic strain intensity, while showing a direct proportional relationship with the damage zone width. For fault zone width quantification, results show convergence between the methods, revealing widths of 2.46–2.65 m for oblique divergence (displacement of 0.20 m), 2.65–3.55 m for pure strike-slip (displacement of 0.20 m), and 4.36–4.46 m for oblique convergence zones (displacement of 0.70 m). The pure strike-slip and the oblique convergence damage zone width results align well with outcrop observations of faults with similar kinematics from the literature, underscoring the significance of numerical modeling as a valuable tool for measure and study the mechanics of characterizing the nucleation of fault zones and quantifying the width of the damage zone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 105201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use a two-dimensional finite-element modeling approach to investigate the structural evolution of strike-slip faults under five different confining pressures and determine how their damage zone widths vary depending on the kinematic. Three representative fault segments are modeled, accounting for movement obliquity forming in pure strike-slip, oblique convergence and oblique divergence scenarios. The elastoplastic constitutive model (Drucker-Prager) was employed to couple an associated flow rule into the initial stress state of a geostatic stage. We applied two empirical methods for determining the width of the damage zone from progressive model response. The first method involves using the plastic strain distribution curve's inflection points, to mathematically fixate the width. The second method uses the standard deviation obtained from a trend Gaussian/Normal probability distribution, with over 98% fit to the plastic strain curve data, simplifying the inference of the strain propagation along the model. The simulation results indicate inverse proportional relationships between confining pressure and both porosity and plastic strain intensity, while showing a direct proportional relationship with the damage zone width. For fault zone width quantification, results show convergence between the methods, revealing widths of 2.46–2.65 m for oblique divergence (displacement of 0.20 m), 2.65–3.55 m for pure strike-slip (displacement of 0.20 m), and 4.36–4.46 m for oblique convergence zones (displacement of 0.70 m). The pure strike-slip and the oblique convergence damage zone width results align well with outcrop observations of faults with similar kinematics from the literature, underscoring the significance of numerical modeling as a valuable tool for measure and study the mechanics of characterizing the nucleation of fault zones and quantifying the width of the damage zone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向滑动断层中破坏带宽度的量化:二维有限元建模方法的启示
我们采用二维有限元建模方法研究了五种不同约束压力下走向滑动断层的结构演变,并确定了其破坏带宽度随运动方式的不同而变化。对三个具有代表性的断层段进行了建模,分别考虑了纯走向滑动、斜收敛和斜发散情况下形成的运动斜度。我们采用弹塑性构造模型(Drucker-Prager)将相关的流动规则与静力阶段的初始应力状态相结合。我们采用了两种经验方法来根据渐进模型响应确定损伤区的宽度。第一种方法是利用塑性应变分布曲线的拐点,从数学上确定宽度。第二种方法使用从趋势高斯/正态概率分布中获得的标准偏差,与塑性应变曲线数据的拟合度超过 98%,简化了应变沿模型传播的推断。模拟结果表明,约束压力与孔隙度和塑性应变强度之间存在反比例关系,而与破坏带宽度之间存在正比例关系。对于断层带宽度的量化,结果表明各种方法之间趋于一致,显示斜向发散(位移为 0.20 米)的断层带宽度为 2.46-2.65 米,纯走向滑动(位移为 0.20 米)的断层带宽度为 2.65-3.55 米,斜向收敛(位移为 0.70 米)的断层带宽度为 4.36-4.46 米。纯走向滑动和斜向收敛破坏带宽度的结果与文献中对具有类似运动学特征的断层的露头观测结果非常吻合,这突出表明了数值建模作为测量和研究断层成核的力学特征以及量化破坏带宽度的重要工具的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Geology
Journal of Structural Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
19.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.
期刊最新文献
Coseismic surface deformation and source mechanism of the 2023 Ms 6.2 Jishishan earthquake, northeastern Tibetan Plateau Lithological control and structural inheritance on faults growth in multilayer foreland sequences Cenozoic faulting of the Ganzi-Yushu (Xianshuihe) fault from apatite (U-Th)/He ages and its implications for the tectonic reorganization in the southeastern Tibetan plateau Seismic and outcrop-based 3D characterization of fault damage zones in sandstones, Rio do Peixe Basin, Brazil Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1