Golden steps: A nursing approach for vitality, agility, and rumination in geriatric clients with depressive disorders through mindful walking

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Archives of Psychiatric Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2024.07.004
Mona Metwally El-Sayed , Manal Mohammed Hawash , Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr , Sarah Ali Hafez , El Saied Abd El Hamid El Sayed Salem , Asmaa Mohammed Saad Khaled , Shaimaa Mohamed Amin , Ayman Mohamed El-Ashry
{"title":"Golden steps: A nursing approach for vitality, agility, and rumination in geriatric clients with depressive disorders through mindful walking","authors":"Mona Metwally El-Sayed ,&nbsp;Manal Mohammed Hawash ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr ,&nbsp;Sarah Ali Hafez ,&nbsp;El Saied Abd El Hamid El Sayed Salem ,&nbsp;Asmaa Mohammed Saad Khaled ,&nbsp;Shaimaa Mohamed Amin ,&nbsp;Ayman Mohamed El-Ashry","doi":"10.1016/j.apnu.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression is a prevalent issue among older adults and can significantly impact their overall quality of life. While traditional treatments may not always be sufficient or suitable for all individuals, the potential of alternative interventions, such as mindful walking, offers a ray of hope. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mindful walking on rumination, agility, vitality, and mindfulness in geriatric patients with depressive disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A prospective quasi-experimental design was employed with a purposive sample of 35 clients in the intervention group and 33 in the control group. This study utilized the Ruminative Responses Scale – Short Form (RRS-SF) and Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to measure the primary outcome. The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and State-Level Version of the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS) were used to measure the secondary outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mindful walking significantly affected vitality, mindfulness, and rumination, with effect sizes (ղ<sup>2</sup> = 0.168, 0.137, and 0.127), respectively. On the other hand, the intervention had a less significant effect on agility, with an effect size (ղ<sup>2</sup> = 0.047).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed that geriatric clients with depressive disorders showed more significant improvements in vitality, followed by improvement in rumination and agility. Integrating mindful walking as a part of care plans for those clients would promote their physical activity and mental well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55466,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 212-221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883941724001389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Depression is a prevalent issue among older adults and can significantly impact their overall quality of life. While traditional treatments may not always be sufficient or suitable for all individuals, the potential of alternative interventions, such as mindful walking, offers a ray of hope. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mindful walking on rumination, agility, vitality, and mindfulness in geriatric patients with depressive disorders.

Method

A prospective quasi-experimental design was employed with a purposive sample of 35 clients in the intervention group and 33 in the control group. This study utilized the Ruminative Responses Scale – Short Form (RRS-SF) and Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) to measure the primary outcome. The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and State-Level Version of the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS) were used to measure the secondary outcomes.

Results

Mindful walking significantly affected vitality, mindfulness, and rumination, with effect sizes (ղ2 = 0.168, 0.137, and 0.127), respectively. On the other hand, the intervention had a less significant effect on agility, with an effect size (ղ2 = 0.047).

Conclusion

This study revealed that geriatric clients with depressive disorders showed more significant improvements in vitality, followed by improvement in rumination and agility. Integrating mindful walking as a part of care plans for those clients would promote their physical activity and mental well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黄金步:通过正念步行,为患有抑郁障碍的老年病患者提供活力、灵活性和反刍的护理方法
背景抑郁症是老年人中普遍存在的问题,会严重影响他们的整体生活质量。虽然传统的治疗方法并不总是足够或适合所有的人,但正念行走等替代性干预措施的潜力为我们带来了一线希望。本研究旨在评估正念行走对老年抑郁症患者的反刍、敏捷性、活力和正念的影响。方法采用前瞻性准实验设计,在干预组和对照组各抽取 35 名患者。本研究采用反刍反应量表-简表(RRS-SF)和五面正念问卷(FFMQ)来测量主要结果。结果 正念步行显著影响了活力、正念和反刍,其效应大小分别为(ղ2 = 0.168、0.137 和 0.127)。结论这项研究表明,患有抑郁症的老年患者在活力方面的改善更为明显,其次是反刍和敏捷性方面的改善。将正念步行纳入这些患者的护理计划中,将促进他们的身体活动和心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
160 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Psychiatric Nursing disseminates original, peer-reviewed research that is of interest to psychiatric and mental health care nurses. The field is considered in its broadest perspective, including theory, practice and research applications related to all ages, special populations, settings, and interdisciplinary collaborations in both the public and private sectors. Through critical study, expositions, and review of practice, Archives of Psychiatric Nursing is a medium for clinical scholarship to provide theoretical linkages among diverse areas of practice.
期刊最新文献
ISPN News Forging connections: The imperative of global collaboration in behavioral health TOC editor's page/editorial board masthead, subscriber information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1