Evaluating disease surveillance strategies for early outbreak detection in contact networks with varying community structure

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2024.06.003
Axel Browne , David Butts , Edgar Jaramillo-Rodriguez , Nidhi Parikh , Geoffrey Fairchild , Zach Needell , Cristian Poliziani , Tom Wenzel , Timothy C. Germann , Sara Del Valle
{"title":"Evaluating disease surveillance strategies for early outbreak detection in contact networks with varying community structure","authors":"Axel Browne ,&nbsp;David Butts ,&nbsp;Edgar Jaramillo-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Nidhi Parikh ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Fairchild ,&nbsp;Zach Needell ,&nbsp;Cristian Poliziani ,&nbsp;Tom Wenzel ,&nbsp;Timothy C. Germann ,&nbsp;Sara Del Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Disease surveillance systems allow public health agencies to respond to emerging diseases before they become widespread. Developing such systems requires identifying optimal ways to monitor in the context of an epidemic outbreak; this problem is known as <em>sensor selection</em>. Contact networks represent the dynamics of interaction in a population and are used to model how a disease spreads in a population and to explore strategies of sensor selection. We evaluated five sensor selection strategies on their ability to provide an early warning of a COVID-like outbreak in synthetic contact networks encapsulated in four network scenarios. Three of these scenarios assessed different aspects of community structure. The fourth scenario employed a contact network representing the population and interactions of 6.8 million people in New York City, constructed from an agent-based simulation using census and transportation data. This scenario exemplifies how sensor selection strategies may perform in a real-world, urban context. Our findings suggest that the choice of the optimal strategy depends heavily on the community structure of the network. Strategies that select highly connected nodes or maximize network coverage are the optimal surveillance strategy for outbreak detection in many network community structures. However, a naive implementation of these strategies may fail to provide an early warning at all—including in the New York City scenario. Moreover, these methods are impractical for real-world use as they require knowledge of the underlying contact network. Instead, a selection strategy that starts with a set of random nodes and then performs a random walk through a chain of neighbors reliably provides early warnings without requiring prior knowledge of the network. We find this method, called “random chain”, to be the most pragmatic for implementation in a real-world disease surveillance context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"79 ","pages":"Pages 122-132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000364/pdfft?md5=fac337893b941443ddb1a4018c7151cf&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873324000364-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disease surveillance systems allow public health agencies to respond to emerging diseases before they become widespread. Developing such systems requires identifying optimal ways to monitor in the context of an epidemic outbreak; this problem is known as sensor selection. Contact networks represent the dynamics of interaction in a population and are used to model how a disease spreads in a population and to explore strategies of sensor selection. We evaluated five sensor selection strategies on their ability to provide an early warning of a COVID-like outbreak in synthetic contact networks encapsulated in four network scenarios. Three of these scenarios assessed different aspects of community structure. The fourth scenario employed a contact network representing the population and interactions of 6.8 million people in New York City, constructed from an agent-based simulation using census and transportation data. This scenario exemplifies how sensor selection strategies may perform in a real-world, urban context. Our findings suggest that the choice of the optimal strategy depends heavily on the community structure of the network. Strategies that select highly connected nodes or maximize network coverage are the optimal surveillance strategy for outbreak detection in many network community structures. However, a naive implementation of these strategies may fail to provide an early warning at all—including in the New York City scenario. Moreover, these methods are impractical for real-world use as they require knowledge of the underlying contact network. Instead, a selection strategy that starts with a set of random nodes and then performs a random walk through a chain of neighbors reliably provides early warnings without requiring prior knowledge of the network. We find this method, called “random chain”, to be the most pragmatic for implementation in a real-world disease surveillance context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估在具有不同社区结构的接触网络中早期发现疫情的疾病监测策略
疾病监测系统使公共卫生机构能够在新出现的疾病蔓延之前对其做出反应。开发此类系统需要确定在流行病爆发时进行监测的最佳方法;这个问题被称为传感器选择。接触网络代表了人群中的互动动态,可用于模拟疾病如何在人群中传播并探索传感器选择策略。我们评估了五种传感器选择策略,看它们能否在四种网络场景下的合成接触网络中提供类似 COVID 爆发的早期预警。其中三种情景评估了群落结构的不同方面。第四种情景采用的接触网络代表了纽约市 680 万人的人口和互动情况,该网络是利用人口普查和交通数据通过基于代理的模拟构建而成的。这一场景体现了传感器选择策略在现实世界的城市环境中的表现。我们的研究结果表明,最佳策略的选择在很大程度上取决于网络的群落结构。在许多网络群落结构中,选择高连接节点或最大化网络覆盖的策略是疫情检测的最佳监控策略。然而,在纽约市的情况下,天真地实施这些策略可能无法在所有节点发出预警。此外,这些方法在实际应用中并不实用,因为它们需要了解底层接触网络。取而代之的是一种选择策略,它从一组随机节点开始,然后在一连串的邻居中执行随机行走,这样就能可靠地提供预警,而不需要事先了解网络情况。我们发现,这种被称为 "随机链 "的方法在现实世界的疾病监测中是最实用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive Editorial Board How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality A stopping rule for randomly sampling bipartite networks with fixed degree sequences Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1