Relationship between hip contact force during gait and patient-reported outcome measures 6 months after total hip arthroplasty

Yasushi Kurihara , Hironori Ohsugi , Tomonari Tosaka , Tadamitsu Matsuda , Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi , Tadashi Tsukeoka
{"title":"Relationship between hip contact force during gait and patient-reported outcome measures 6 months after total hip arthroplasty","authors":"Yasushi Kurihara ,&nbsp;Hironori Ohsugi ,&nbsp;Tomonari Tosaka ,&nbsp;Tadamitsu Matsuda ,&nbsp;Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi ,&nbsp;Tadashi Tsukeoka","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Evaluating the hip contact force (HCF) during gait is important for assessing treatment outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and HCF during gait after THA as well as gait biomechanical factors affecting HCF during gait in relation to PROMs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 29 female patients who underwent THA with a 6-month follow-up were included in this study. Musculoskeletal model analysis was performed to obtain the first and second peak values of the HCF during gait and the minimum value between both peaks. PROMs were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ). The relationship between JHEQ and selected HCFs and between the HCF and gait biomechanical factors was examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The second peak value of HCF was positively related to the total JHEQ, movement, and mental health scores (<em>r</em> ​= ​−0.551, 0.410, and 0.495, respectively). A positive relationship was found between the second peak value of the HCF and hip flexion–extension range of motion (<em>r</em> ​= ​0.518), maximum hip abduction moment (<em>r</em> ​= ​0.432), and maximum knee extension moment (<em>r</em> ​= ​0.417). A negative relationship was found between the second peak value of the HCF and the maximum knee abduction moment (<em>r</em> ​= ​−0.458).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The second peak value of HCF during gait after THA was related to PROMs. The second peak value was related to the hip flexion–extension range of motion, maximum hip abduction moment, and maximum knee extension and abduction moment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 129-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705124000173/pdfft?md5=e5b3efb018f0b6568f444045e5775b0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2949705124000173-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705124000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluating the hip contact force (HCF) during gait is important for assessing treatment outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated the relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and HCF during gait after THA as well as gait biomechanical factors affecting HCF during gait in relation to PROMs.

Methods

In total, 29 female patients who underwent THA with a 6-month follow-up were included in this study. Musculoskeletal model analysis was performed to obtain the first and second peak values of the HCF during gait and the minimum value between both peaks. PROMs were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ). The relationship between JHEQ and selected HCFs and between the HCF and gait biomechanical factors was examined.

Results

The second peak value of HCF was positively related to the total JHEQ, movement, and mental health scores (r ​= ​−0.551, 0.410, and 0.495, respectively). A positive relationship was found between the second peak value of the HCF and hip flexion–extension range of motion (r ​= ​0.518), maximum hip abduction moment (r ​= ​0.432), and maximum knee extension moment (r ​= ​0.417). A negative relationship was found between the second peak value of the HCF and the maximum knee abduction moment (r ​= ​−0.458).

Conclusions

The second peak value of HCF during gait after THA was related to PROMs. The second peak value was related to the hip flexion–extension range of motion, maximum hip abduction moment, and maximum knee extension and abduction moment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全髋关节置换术后 6 个月步态中的髋关节接触力与患者报告的结果指标之间的关系
目的 评估步态过程中的髋关节接触力(HCF)对于评估全髋关节置换术(THA)后的治疗效果非常重要。本研究调查了患者报告的结果指标(PROMs)与全髋关节置换术后步态过程中髋关节接触力(HCF)之间的关系,以及影响步态过程中髋关节接触力(HCF)的步态生物力学因素与患者报告的结果指标之间的关系。通过肌肉骨骼模型分析,得出步态过程中 HCF 的第一和第二个峰值,以及两个峰值之间的最小值。使用日本骨科协会髋关节疾病评估问卷(JHEQ)对PROM进行评估。结果HCF的第二个峰值与JHEQ总分、运动和心理健康得分呈正相关(r=-0.551、0.410和0.495)。HCF的第二个峰值与髋关节屈伸活动范围(r = 0.518)、最大髋关节外展力矩(r = 0.432)和最大膝关节伸展力矩(r = 0.417)之间存在正相关关系。结论 THA术后步态过程中HCF的第二个峰值与PROMs有关。第二峰值与髋关节屈伸运动范围、最大髋关节外展力矩、最大膝关节外展和内收力矩有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention of surgical site infection: need to focus on the enemy within Appreciation to reviewers in 2024 Therapeutic strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures based on three classification systems Examination of intra-operative blood loss on the first side to perform simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty without allogeneic blood transfusion Comparison of cup placement accuracy using the navigation in total hip arthroplasty between three models using inverse probability of treatment weighting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1