Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events following Catheter Ablation

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1155/2024/1087623
Mingjie Lin, Juntao Wang, Bing Rong, Kai Zhang, Tongshuai Chen, Wenqiang Han, Tong Hu, Tianyu Wang, Haonan Deng, Jingquan Zhong, Lin Wu
{"title":"Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events following Catheter Ablation","authors":"Mingjie Lin,&nbsp;Juntao Wang,&nbsp;Bing Rong,&nbsp;Kai Zhang,&nbsp;Tongshuai Chen,&nbsp;Wenqiang Han,&nbsp;Tong Hu,&nbsp;Tianyu Wang,&nbsp;Haonan Deng,&nbsp;Jingquan Zhong,&nbsp;Lin Wu","doi":"10.1155/2024/1087623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Further evidence is required to understand the impact of preexisting and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) following catheter ablation. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. Data from 1,685 patients (1,406 without DM vs. 279 with DM) who underwent AF catheter ablation between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. These participants were prospectively monitored for incidents of AF recurrence and MACCE over an average period of 58.1 months. <i>Results</i>. A higher incidence of AF recurrence (24.6% vs. 34.4%) and a greater frequency of MACCE (6.5% vs. 9.3%) were observed among DM patients. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that DM significantly increased the rates of AF recurrence, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.506 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.165–1.948 (<i>p</i> = 0.0003). This association persisted in the propensity-matched cohort. DM was independently predictive of AF recurrence after adjusting for potential risks using Cox regression analysis. Notably, new-onset DM was also found to be an independent predictor of AF recurrence. Similarly, DM was an independent risk of MACCE (HR [95% CI], 2.273 [1.120–4.615], <i>p</i> = 0.023). <i>Conclusions</i>. Both existing DM and newly diagnosed DM were identified as independent risk factors for AF recurrence following ablation; they also significantly impacted MACCE outcomes. This study underscores the urgent need for careful management of DM among individuals undergoing AF ablation in order to reduce the likelihood of arrhythmic relapse. This analysis utilized data from a prospective observational study registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on July 20, 2014 (ChiCTR-OCH-14004674).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1087623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1087623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Further evidence is required to understand the impact of preexisting and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) following catheter ablation. Materials and Methods. Data from 1,685 patients (1,406 without DM vs. 279 with DM) who underwent AF catheter ablation between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. These participants were prospectively monitored for incidents of AF recurrence and MACCE over an average period of 58.1 months. Results. A higher incidence of AF recurrence (24.6% vs. 34.4%) and a greater frequency of MACCE (6.5% vs. 9.3%) were observed among DM patients. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that DM significantly increased the rates of AF recurrence, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.506 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.165–1.948 (p = 0.0003). This association persisted in the propensity-matched cohort. DM was independently predictive of AF recurrence after adjusting for potential risks using Cox regression analysis. Notably, new-onset DM was also found to be an independent predictor of AF recurrence. Similarly, DM was an independent risk of MACCE (HR [95% CI], 2.273 [1.120–4.615], p = 0.023). Conclusions. Both existing DM and newly diagnosed DM were identified as independent risk factors for AF recurrence following ablation; they also significantly impacted MACCE outcomes. This study underscores the urgent need for careful management of DM among individuals undergoing AF ablation in order to reduce the likelihood of arrhythmic relapse. This analysis utilized data from a prospective observational study registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on July 20, 2014 (ChiCTR-OCH-14004674).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病对导管消融术后心房颤动复发和主要心脑血管不良事件的影响
导言。要了解导管消融术后原有和新诊断的糖尿病(DM)对心房颤动(AF)复发和主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs)的影响,还需要进一步的证据。材料与方法。对2015年至2019年期间接受房颤导管消融术的1685名患者(1406名无DM,279名有DM)的数据进行了分析。在平均 58.1 个月的时间内,对这些参与者的房颤复发和 MACCE 事件进行了前瞻性监测。结果显示在糖尿病患者中观察到更高的房颤复发率(24.6% 对 34.4%)和更高的 MACCE 频率(6.5% 对 9.3%)。卡普兰-梅耶曲线显示,糖尿病会显著增加房颤复发率,危险比 (HR) 为 1.506,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 1.165-1.948 (p = 0.0003)。这种关联在倾向匹配队列中持续存在。使用 Cox 回归分析对潜在风险进行调整后,DM 可独立预测房颤复发。值得注意的是,新发的 DM 也是房颤复发的独立预测因素。同样,DM 也是 MACCE 的独立风险因素(HR [95% CI], 2.273 [1.120-4.615], p = 0.023)。结论。现有的 DM 和新诊断的 DM 都被确定为消融术后房颤复发的独立风险因素;它们还对 MACCE 的结果有显著影响。这项研究强调,迫切需要对接受房颤消融术的患者进行细致的 DM 管理,以降低心律失常复发的可能性。本分析采用了2014年7月20日在中国临床试验注册中心注册的一项前瞻性观察研究的数据(ChiCTR-OCH-14004674)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
High Prevalence of Unrecorded Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England, and Spain: The Multinational, Observational REVEAL-CKD Study Influencing Factors for Depression and Depression Aggravation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Blood Urea Nitrogen to Albumin Ratio Was Associated With Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity–Adjusted Analysis Affordability of Original and Generic Antihypertensive Drugs Under the National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy and Basic Medical Insurance System: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Xi’an, China Guidelines for Returning to Dance Following Concussion: Adaptations From Sport Concussion Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1