Radiological cervical foraminal stenosis severity and morphology as a predictor of pre-operative function and functional surgical outcome.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2024.2376647
James Meacock, Alex Smedley, Priyank Sinha, Mark Igra, Jeremy Macmullen-Price, David Jayne, Deborah Stocken, Stuart Currie, Simon Thomson
{"title":"Radiological cervical foraminal stenosis severity and morphology as a predictor of pre-operative function and functional surgical outcome.","authors":"James Meacock, Alex Smedley, Priyank Sinha, Mark Igra, Jeremy Macmullen-Price, David Jayne, Deborah Stocken, Stuart Currie, Simon Thomson","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2024.2376647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical foraminal stenosis on MRI may be assessed using the Kim, modified Kim or Siller methods. This study aimed to investigate which morphological features of cervical foraminal stenosis in patients with cervical radiculopathy correlated best with pre-operative and post-operative surgical outcome following Anterior Cervical Discectomy (ACD) or a Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre-operative MRIs of adults with cervical radiculopathy were assessed by six raters. The following measurements were made; uncompressed nerve root diameter, maximal compressed nerve root diameter, anterior & posterior compression, length of the neuroforaminal canal where the diameter was less than the uncompressed nerve root diameter and the distance of maximum compression from the apex of the ligamentum flavum. The Kim, modified Kim and Siller grades were calculated. Neck Disability Index (NDI) was measured pre-operatively and six weeks post-operatively. The radiological measurements and grades were compared to the pre-operative and change in NDI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean NDI was higher in female (58.2) than male patients (45.6) <i>p</i> = 0.05. No other baseline, operative or radiological factors where significantly associated with the pre-operative NDI. The mean [±SD] post-operative NDI was 14.3 [±22.5]. This represents a change of 37.8 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The pre-operative NDI correlated strongly with the post-operative NDI but no other patient, operation or radiological factors correlated significantly. Neither pre-operative NDI or change in NDI was statistically different in those treated with ACD and those treated with PCF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no association between pre-operative NDI and any of the radiological measurements or radiological grades. Furthermore, whilst surgery significantly improved NDI, for those patients with anterior compression, there was no difference in outcome between those treated with an ACD and those treated with a PCF. Current axial MRIs do not adequately assess the cervical nerve root foramina or predict surgical approach, 3D isotropic acquisition and DTI should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2024.2376647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical foraminal stenosis on MRI may be assessed using the Kim, modified Kim or Siller methods. This study aimed to investigate which morphological features of cervical foraminal stenosis in patients with cervical radiculopathy correlated best with pre-operative and post-operative surgical outcome following Anterior Cervical Discectomy (ACD) or a Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF).

Methods: Pre-operative MRIs of adults with cervical radiculopathy were assessed by six raters. The following measurements were made; uncompressed nerve root diameter, maximal compressed nerve root diameter, anterior & posterior compression, length of the neuroforaminal canal where the diameter was less than the uncompressed nerve root diameter and the distance of maximum compression from the apex of the ligamentum flavum. The Kim, modified Kim and Siller grades were calculated. Neck Disability Index (NDI) was measured pre-operatively and six weeks post-operatively. The radiological measurements and grades were compared to the pre-operative and change in NDI.

Results: Mean NDI was higher in female (58.2) than male patients (45.6) p = 0.05. No other baseline, operative or radiological factors where significantly associated with the pre-operative NDI. The mean [±SD] post-operative NDI was 14.3 [±22.5]. This represents a change of 37.8 (p < 0.001). The pre-operative NDI correlated strongly with the post-operative NDI but no other patient, operation or radiological factors correlated significantly. Neither pre-operative NDI or change in NDI was statistically different in those treated with ACD and those treated with PCF.

Conclusion: There was no association between pre-operative NDI and any of the radiological measurements or radiological grades. Furthermore, whilst surgery significantly improved NDI, for those patients with anterior compression, there was no difference in outcome between those treated with an ACD and those treated with a PCF. Current axial MRIs do not adequately assess the cervical nerve root foramina or predict surgical approach, 3D isotropic acquisition and DTI should be explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射学颈椎椎管狭窄的严重程度和形态可预测术前功能和功能性手术效果。
背景:核磁共振成像上的颈椎椎管狭窄可采用 Kim、改良 Kim 或 Siller 方法进行评估。本研究旨在探讨颈椎病患者颈椎椎间孔狭窄的哪些形态特征与颈椎前路椎间盘切除术(ACD)或颈椎后路椎板切除术(PCF)的术前和术后手术效果最相关:方法:由六名评分员对患有颈椎病的成人进行术前核磁共振成像评估。方法:由六名评分员对颈椎病成人患者的术前 MRI 图像进行评估,并进行以下测量:未受压神经根直径、最大受压神经根直径、前后压迫、神经孔管长度(其中神经孔管直径小于未受压神经根直径)以及最大压迫距离黄韧带顶点的距离。计算出金氏分级、改良金氏分级和席勒分级。术前和术后六周测量颈部残疾指数(NDI)。将放射学测量结果和等级与术前和术后 NDI 的变化进行比较:女性患者的平均 NDI(58.2)高于男性患者(45.6),P = 0.05。其他基线、手术或放射学因素均与术前 NDI 无明显关联。术后 NDI 的平均值为 14.3 [±SD] [±22.5]。术后 NDI 平均值[±SD]为 14.3 [±22.5],变化了 37.8(P术前 NDI 与任何放射学测量或放射学分级之间均无关联。此外,虽然手术能明显改善 NDI,但对于前部受压的患者,使用 ACD 和 PCF 治疗的结果并无差异。目前的轴向磁共振成像无法充分评估颈神经根孔或预测手术方法,因此应探索三维各向同性采集和 DTI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
期刊最新文献
Arachnoid webs causing rostral syrinx due to ball-valve effect: an illustrative report of two cases. Usability of mixed reality in awake craniotomy planning. Intravenous milrinone for delayed cerebral ischaemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review. A prospective observational study of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic changes in traumatic brain injury - effect of surgical decompression. Posterior fossa epidermoid tumors: a single-center study and proposed classification system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1