In-hospital outcomes following surgery versus conservative therapy in elderly patients with C2 fractures: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-07-12 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231131
Sam H Jiang, Ryan K Wang, Morteza Sadeh, Zayed Almadidy, Ankit I Mehta, Nauman S Chaudhry
{"title":"In-hospital outcomes following surgery versus conservative therapy in elderly patients with C2 fractures: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Sam H Jiang, Ryan K Wang, Morteza Sadeh, Zayed Almadidy, Ankit I Mehta, Nauman S Chaudhry","doi":"10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Second cervical vertebrae (C2) fractures are a common traumatic spinal injury in the elderly population. Surgical fusion and nonoperative bracing are two primary treatments for cervical instability, but the former is often withheld in the elderly due to concerns for poor postoperative outcomes arising from patient frailty. This study sought to evaluate the in-hospital differences in mortality, outcomes, and discharge disposition in elderly patients with C2 fractures undergoing surgical intervention compared with conservative therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for all patients aged ≥ 65 years with C2 fractures undergoing either surgical stabilization or conservative therapy. Propensity score matching was performed using k-nearest neighbors with replacement based on patient demographics, comorbidities, insurance type, injury severity, and fracture type. Group differences were compared using Student t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple comparisons correction. Subgroup analyses were performed in the 65-74, 75-79, and 80+ year age subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six thousand forty-nine patients were identified, of whom 2156 underwent surgery and 3893 received conservative treatment. Following matching, the surgery group had significantly lower mortality rates (5.52% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001), a longer mean hospital length of stay (LOS; 12.64 vs 7.49 days p < 0.001), and slightly higher rates of several complications (< 3% difference), as well as lower rates of discharge home (14.56% vs 23.52%, p < 0.001) and to hospice (1.07% vs 2.09%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of discharge to intermediate care (68.83% vs 48.28%, p < 0.001). Similar trends in mortality and LOS were noted in all 3 subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In elderly patients with C2 fractures, surgical stabilization confers a small survival advantage with a slightly higher in-hospital complication rate compared to conservative therapy. The increased rate of discharge to rehabilitation may represent better long-term prognosis following surgery. The increased risk of short-term complications is present but relatively small, thus surgery should not be withheld in patients with good long-term prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"498-507"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.4.SPINE231131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Second cervical vertebrae (C2) fractures are a common traumatic spinal injury in the elderly population. Surgical fusion and nonoperative bracing are two primary treatments for cervical instability, but the former is often withheld in the elderly due to concerns for poor postoperative outcomes arising from patient frailty. This study sought to evaluate the in-hospital differences in mortality, outcomes, and discharge disposition in elderly patients with C2 fractures undergoing surgical intervention compared with conservative therapy.

Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for all patients aged ≥ 65 years with C2 fractures undergoing either surgical stabilization or conservative therapy. Propensity score matching was performed using k-nearest neighbors with replacement based on patient demographics, comorbidities, insurance type, injury severity, and fracture type. Group differences were compared using Student t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple comparisons correction. Subgroup analyses were performed in the 65-74, 75-79, and 80+ year age subgroups.

Results: Six thousand forty-nine patients were identified, of whom 2156 underwent surgery and 3893 received conservative treatment. Following matching, the surgery group had significantly lower mortality rates (5.52% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001), a longer mean hospital length of stay (LOS; 12.64 vs 7.49 days p < 0.001), and slightly higher rates of several complications (< 3% difference), as well as lower rates of discharge home (14.56% vs 23.52%, p < 0.001) and to hospice (1.07% vs 2.09%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of discharge to intermediate care (68.83% vs 48.28%, p < 0.001). Similar trends in mortality and LOS were noted in all 3 subgroups.

Conclusions: In elderly patients with C2 fractures, surgical stabilization confers a small survival advantage with a slightly higher in-hospital complication rate compared to conservative therapy. The increased rate of discharge to rehabilitation may represent better long-term prognosis following surgery. The increased risk of short-term complications is present but relatively small, thus surgery should not be withheld in patients with good long-term prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
C2骨折老年患者手术与保守治疗后的院内疗效:倾向得分匹配分析。
目的:第二颈椎(C2)骨折是老年人群中常见的脊柱外伤。手术融合和非手术支具是治疗颈椎不稳的两种主要方法,但由于担心患者体质虚弱导致术后效果不佳,前者通常不被老年人采用。本研究旨在评估接受手术治疗与保守治疗的 C2 骨折老年患者在院内死亡率、治疗效果和出院处置方面的差异:从2017年到2019年,对国家创伤数据库中所有年龄≥65岁、接受手术稳定或保守治疗的C2骨折患者进行了查询。根据患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、保险类型、受伤严重程度和骨折类型,使用k-近邻替换法进行倾向得分匹配。使用学生 t 检验和皮尔逊卡方检验比较组间差异,并进行 Benjamini-Hochberg 多重比较校正。对 65-74 岁、75-79 岁和 80 岁以上年龄组进行了分组分析:共发现 649 名患者,其中 2156 人接受了手术治疗,3893 人接受了保守治疗。匹配后,手术组的死亡率明显较低(5.52% 对 9.6%,P < 0.001),平均住院时间(LOS;12.64 天对 7.49 天,P < 0.001),几种并发症的发生率略高(差异< 3%),出院回家(14.56% vs 23.52%,p < 0.001)和临终关怀(1.07% vs 2.09%,p = 0.02)的比例较低,出院转入中级护理(68.83% vs 48.28%,p < 0.001)的比例较高。所有3个亚组的死亡率和住院时间趋势相似:结论:与保守疗法相比,手术稳定C2骨折老年患者的生存率略高,但院内并发症发生率略高。出院康复率的提高可能代表了手术后更好的长期预后。短期并发症的风险增加是存在的,但相对较小,因此对于长期预后良好的患者,不应放弃手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
A novel interpretable classification of lumbar spinal stenosis using a cascade deep learning approach and T2-weighted MRI. Is the chin-brow vertical angle always a reliable parameter for surgical planning in the correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis? Letter to the Editor. Minimally invasive versus open decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Letter to the Editor. Do fracture morphology and disability trajectories truly diverge in thoracolumbar burst injuries? Opioid use and complications following short-segment fusions in patients with psychiatric disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1