Lessons learned from rebranding a radiology education facebook page

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.012
{"title":"Lessons learned from rebranding a radiology education facebook page","authors":"","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In May 2009, we created a Facebook page for radiology education. While we shared a host of learning materials such as case images, quiz questions, and medical illustrations, we also posted world news, music, and memes. In February 2023, we eliminated everything from the site not related to radiology education. Our aim was to determine how focusing on radiology education alone would affect audience growth for our Facebook page.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We exported our Facebook post data for the dates March 1, 2023 through February 29, 2024, to represent the full calendar year after we revised our content presentation, which we compared to data from November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021. The mean and standard deviation for each post type's reach for 2023/24 were analyzed and compared against the 2020/21 statistics, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to obtain p-values. Linear regressions for each year were performed to understand the relationship between reach and engagement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4,270 posts were included in our new analysis. Our average number of posts per day decreased from 24.8 to 11.71, reducing by more than half the amount of content shared to our social media page. Our posts had a mean overall reach of 4,660—compared to 1,743 in 2021 (p=0.0000). There was a statistically significant increase in reach for posts on artificial intelligence, case images, medical illustrations, pearls, quiz images, quiz videos, slideshow images, and both types of instructional videos (p&lt;0.005). For both 2021 and 2024, the linear regression slopes were positive (y=0.0687x−65.0279 and y=0.006334x+21.3425, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Facebook and other social media have been found to be helpful sources for radiology education. Our experience and statistics with radiology education via social media may help other radiology educators better curate their own pages. To optimize experiences for students, professionals, and other users, and to reach more people, we found that providing readily accessible radiology education is preferred to the social aspects of social media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 685-688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824001233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

In May 2009, we created a Facebook page for radiology education. While we shared a host of learning materials such as case images, quiz questions, and medical illustrations, we also posted world news, music, and memes. In February 2023, we eliminated everything from the site not related to radiology education. Our aim was to determine how focusing on radiology education alone would affect audience growth for our Facebook page.

Materials and methods

We exported our Facebook post data for the dates March 1, 2023 through February 29, 2024, to represent the full calendar year after we revised our content presentation, which we compared to data from November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021. The mean and standard deviation for each post type's reach for 2023/24 were analyzed and compared against the 2020/21 statistics, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to obtain p-values. Linear regressions for each year were performed to understand the relationship between reach and engagement.

Results

A total of 4,270 posts were included in our new analysis. Our average number of posts per day decreased from 24.8 to 11.71, reducing by more than half the amount of content shared to our social media page. Our posts had a mean overall reach of 4,660—compared to 1,743 in 2021 (p=0.0000). There was a statistically significant increase in reach for posts on artificial intelligence, case images, medical illustrations, pearls, quiz images, quiz videos, slideshow images, and both types of instructional videos (p<0.005). For both 2021 and 2024, the linear regression slopes were positive (y=0.0687x−65.0279 and y=0.006334x+21.3425, respectively).

Conclusions

Facebook and other social media have been found to be helpful sources for radiology education. Our experience and statistics with radiology education via social media may help other radiology educators better curate their own pages. To optimize experiences for students, professionals, and other users, and to reach more people, we found that providing readily accessible radiology education is preferred to the social aspects of social media.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重塑放射学教育 facebook 页面的经验教训。
目标:2009 年 5 月,我们在 Facebook 上创建了一个放射学教育页面。我们在分享病例图片、问答题和医学插图等大量学习资料的同时,还发布世界新闻、音乐和备忘录。2023 年 2 月,我们删除了网站上所有与放射学教育无关的内容。我们的目的是确定只关注放射学教育会如何影响我们 Facebook 页面的受众增长:我们导出了 2023 年 3 月 1 日至 2024 年 2 月 29 日的 Facebook 帖子数据,以代表我们修改内容介绍后的整个日历年,并与 2020 年 11 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日的数据进行了比较。我们分析了 2023/24 年每个帖子类型覆盖率的平均值和标准偏差,并与 2020/21 年的统计数据进行了比较,使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验得出 p 值。为了解影响力和参与度之间的关系,对每年的数据进行了线性回归:共有 4270 篇文章被纳入我们的新分析。我们平均每天发布的帖子数量从 24.8 个减少到 11.71 个,分享到社交媒体页面的内容减少了一半以上。我们帖子的平均总体覆盖率为 4,660 人,而 2021 年为 1,743 人(P=0.0000)。人工智能、病例图片、医学插图、珍珠、问答图片、问答视频、幻灯片图片以及两种类型的教学视频帖子的传播率都有统计学意义上的显著增长(p结论:人们发现,Facebook 和其他社交媒体对放射学教育很有帮助。我们通过社交媒体开展放射学教育的经验和统计数据可能有助于其他放射学教育工作者更好地策划自己的网页。为了优化学生、专业人士和其他用户的体验,并让更多的人了解,我们发现,提供易于获取的放射学教育比社交媒体的社交方面更受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Gender equality in radiology: 3 steps worth taking Breast Imaging: what women & healthcare professionals need to know #HeForShe in radiology: A toolkit for radiologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1