Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of diabetes: results from a population-based prospective cohort

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetologia Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1007/s00125-024-06221-5
Shutong Du, Valerie K. Sullivan, Michael Fang, Lawrence J. Appel, Elizabeth Selvin, Casey M. Rebholz
{"title":"Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of diabetes: results from a population-based prospective cohort","authors":"Shutong Du, Valerie K. Sullivan, Michael Fang, Lawrence J. Appel, Elizabeth Selvin, Casey M. Rebholz","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06221-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Understanding the impact of the overall construct of ultra-processed foods on diabetes risk can inform dietary approaches to diabetes prevention. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of diabetes in a community-based cohort of middle-aged adults in the USA. We hypothesised that a higher intake of ultra-processed foods is associated with a higher risk of incident diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The study included 13,172 participants without diabetes at baseline (1987–1989) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Dietary intake was assessed with a 66-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire, and foods were categorised by processing level using the Nova classification system. Ultra-processed food was analysed categorically (quartiles of energy-adjusted intake) and continuously (per one additional serving/day). We used Cox regression to evaluate the association of ultra-processed food intake with risk of diabetes with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, total energy intake, health behaviours and clinical factors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Over a median follow-up of 21 years, there were 4539 cases of incident diabetes. Participants in the highest quartile of ultra-processed food intake (8.4 servings/day on average) had a significantly higher risk of diabetes (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03, 1.23) compared with participants in the lowest quartile of intake after adjustment for sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical factors. Each additional serving of ultra-processed food consumed daily was associated with a 2% higher risk of diabetes (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Highest quartile consumption of certain ultra-processed food groups, including sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages, ultra-processed meats and sugary snacks, was associated with a 29%, 21% and 16% higher risk of diabetes, respectively, compared with the lowest quartile.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>We found that a higher intake of ultra-processed food was associated with higher risk of incident diabetes, particularly sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages, ultra-processed meats and sugary snacks. Our findings suggest interventions reducing ultra-processed food consumption and specific food groups may be an effective strategy for diabetes prevention.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06221-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Understanding the impact of the overall construct of ultra-processed foods on diabetes risk can inform dietary approaches to diabetes prevention. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of diabetes in a community-based cohort of middle-aged adults in the USA. We hypothesised that a higher intake of ultra-processed foods is associated with a higher risk of incident diabetes.

Methods

The study included 13,172 participants without diabetes at baseline (1987–1989) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Dietary intake was assessed with a 66-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire, and foods were categorised by processing level using the Nova classification system. Ultra-processed food was analysed categorically (quartiles of energy-adjusted intake) and continuously (per one additional serving/day). We used Cox regression to evaluate the association of ultra-processed food intake with risk of diabetes with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, total energy intake, health behaviours and clinical factors.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 21 years, there were 4539 cases of incident diabetes. Participants in the highest quartile of ultra-processed food intake (8.4 servings/day on average) had a significantly higher risk of diabetes (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03, 1.23) compared with participants in the lowest quartile of intake after adjustment for sociodemographic, lifestyle and clinical factors. Each additional serving of ultra-processed food consumed daily was associated with a 2% higher risk of diabetes (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Highest quartile consumption of certain ultra-processed food groups, including sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages, ultra-processed meats and sugary snacks, was associated with a 29%, 21% and 16% higher risk of diabetes, respectively, compared with the lowest quartile.

Conclusions/interpretation

We found that a higher intake of ultra-processed food was associated with higher risk of incident diabetes, particularly sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages, ultra-processed meats and sugary snacks. Our findings suggest interventions reducing ultra-processed food consumption and specific food groups may be an effective strategy for diabetes prevention.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超加工食品消费与糖尿病风险:基于人群的前瞻性队列研究结果
目的/假设了解超标加工食品的整体结构对糖尿病风险的影响,可以为预防糖尿病的饮食方法提供参考。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估美国社区中年人队列中超标加工食品摄入量与糖尿病风险之间的关系。我们假设,超加工食品摄入量越高,罹患糖尿病的风险就越高。研究方法这项研究纳入了 13,172 名基线(1987-1989 年)时未患糖尿病的社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究参与者。通过 66 项半定量食物频率问卷对膳食摄入量进行评估,并使用 Nova 分类系统按加工程度对食物进行分类。对超加工食品进行了分类(能量调整后摄入量的四分位数)和连续分析(每增加一份/天)。在对社会人口特征、总能量摄入、健康行为和临床因素进行调整后,我们使用 Cox 回归法评估了超加工食品摄入量与糖尿病风险的关系。在对社会人口学、生活方式和临床因素进行调整后,超加工食品摄入量最高的四分位数参与者(平均每天8.4份)与摄入量最低的四分位数参与者相比,患糖尿病的风险明显更高(HR为1.13;95% CI为1.03,1.23)。每天每多摄入一份超加工食品,患糖尿病的风险就会增加 2%(HR 1.02;95% CI 1.00,1.04)。与消费量最低的四分位数相比,某些超加工食品(包括含糖和人工甜味饮料、超加工肉类和含糖零食)消费量最高的四分位数的糖尿病风险分别高出29%、21%和16%。结论/解释我们发现,超加工食品摄入量越高,糖尿病发病风险越高,尤其是含糖和人工甜味饮料、超加工肉类和含糖零食。我们的研究结果表明,减少超加工食品和特定食品组的摄入量可能是预防糖尿病的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
The DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin improves glycaemic control and early-stage diabetic nephropathy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the MiniMed 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop system: a randomised controlled trial Genetic evidence for efficacy of targeting IL-2, IL-6 and TYK2 signalling in the prevention of type 1 diabetes: a Mendelian randomisation study Risk factors for Charcot foot development in individuals with diabetes mellitus Metabolic health in people living with type 1 diabetes in Belgium: a repeated cross-sectional study Up Front
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1