Development and validation of a risk prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1007/s40520-024-02797-5
Yaqin Li, Yuting Huang, Fangxin Wei, Tanjian Li, Yu Wang
{"title":"Development and validation of a risk prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in older adults.","authors":"Yaqin Li, Yuting Huang, Fangxin Wei, Tanjian Li, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02797-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to develop a risk prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were selected from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database and randomly assigned to the training group and the validation group, with proportions of 70% and 30%, respectively. LASSO regression analysis was used to screen the predictors. Then, identified predictors were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis and used to construct model nomogram. The performance of the model was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>528 out of 3962 participants (13.3%) developed MCR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that weakness, chronic pain, limb dysfunction score, visual acuity score and Five-Times-Sit-To-Stand test were predictors of MCR in older adults. Using these factors, a nomogram model was constructed. The AUC values for the training and validation sets of the predictive model were 0.735 (95% CI = 0.708-0.763) and 0.745 (95% CI = 0.705-0.785), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nomogram constructed in this study is a useful tool for assessing the risk of MCR in older adults, which can help clinicians identify individuals at high risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-024-02797-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a risk prediction model for motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) in older adults.

Methods: Participants were selected from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database and randomly assigned to the training group and the validation group, with proportions of 70% and 30%, respectively. LASSO regression analysis was used to screen the predictors. Then, identified predictors were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis and used to construct model nomogram. The performance of the model was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: 528 out of 3962 participants (13.3%) developed MCR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that weakness, chronic pain, limb dysfunction score, visual acuity score and Five-Times-Sit-To-Stand test were predictors of MCR in older adults. Using these factors, a nomogram model was constructed. The AUC values for the training and validation sets of the predictive model were 0.735 (95% CI = 0.708-0.763) and 0.745 (95% CI = 0.705-0.785), respectively.

Conclusion: The nomogram constructed in this study is a useful tool for assessing the risk of MCR in older adults, which can help clinicians identify individuals at high risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证老年人运动性认知风险综合征的风险预测模型。
研究目的本研究旨在建立老年人运动性认知风险综合征(MCR)的风险预测模型:从2015年中国健康与退休纵向研究数据库中选取参与者,随机分配到训练组和验证组,比例分别为70%和30%。采用LASSO回归分析筛选预测因子。然后,将确定的预测因素纳入多元逻辑回归分析,并用于构建模型提名图。通过接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型的性能进行评估:结果:3962 名参与者中有 528 人(13.3%)出现了 MCR。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,虚弱、慢性疼痛、肢体功能障碍评分、视力评分和五次坐立测试是老年人发生 MCR 的预测因素。利用这些因素构建了一个提名图模型。预测模型的训练集和验证集的AUC值分别为0.735(95% CI = 0.708-0.763)和0.745(95% CI = 0.705-0.785):本研究构建的提名图是评估老年人罹患 MCR 风险的有用工具,可帮助临床医生识别高风险人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Validation of the German version of the SarQoL® questionnaire in sarcopenic and probable sarcopenic patients Auto-Global Examination of Mental State (Auto-GEMS): a web-based self-administered cognitive screening Association between frailty status and risk of chronic lung disease: an analysis based on two national prospective cohorts Use of the Brief-BESTest partially instrumented with accelerometry to detect balance deterioration in middle-age Disability trends among elderly Ukrainians in war conditions: a 10-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1