Surgical strategy in treatment of metopic synostosis in a single centre experience: technical note and quantitative analysis of the outcomes.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Child's Nervous System Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1007/s00381-024-06520-7
Mino Zucchelli, Federica Ruggiero, Micol Babini, Mariella Lefosse, Alessandro Borghi, Naiara Rodriguez-Florez, Achille Tarsitano, Francesca Nicolini, Ercole Galassi
{"title":"Surgical strategy in treatment of metopic synostosis in a single centre experience: technical note and quantitative analysis of the outcomes.","authors":"Mino Zucchelli, Federica Ruggiero, Micol Babini, Mariella Lefosse, Alessandro Borghi, Naiara Rodriguez-Florez, Achille Tarsitano, Francesca Nicolini, Ercole Galassi","doi":"10.1007/s00381-024-06520-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trigonocephaly is the most common craniosynostosis involving orbits. Although some degree of agreement has been reached regarding surgical timing and indications for treatment, there is no consensus regarding the ideal operative technique to guarantee an optimal morphological outcome. The purpose of this study is to describe both strategies and to compare morphological outcomes by means of morphological surface analysis obtained from three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry, with two different techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated 43 patients with metopic synostosis surgically treated between 2004 and 2020. Two different techniques were applied, addressed as technique A and B. Ten patients undergone postoperative 3d stereophotogrammetry were enrolled, and cephalometric measurements were taken and compared to a cohort of unaffected patients matched by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of the groups demonstrated a hypercorrection of the metopic angle of the second technique, associated with a slightly lower correction of the interfrontoparietal diameter. The metopic angle showed to be significantly undercorrected with the first method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alternated barrel staving technique appears to be a quick and satisfactory method in cranial remodelling for metopic synostosis. It guarantees an optimal aesthetic result in the first years after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9970,"journal":{"name":"Child's Nervous System","volume":" ","pages":"3963-3970"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06520-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Trigonocephaly is the most common craniosynostosis involving orbits. Although some degree of agreement has been reached regarding surgical timing and indications for treatment, there is no consensus regarding the ideal operative technique to guarantee an optimal morphological outcome. The purpose of this study is to describe both strategies and to compare morphological outcomes by means of morphological surface analysis obtained from three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry, with two different techniques.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated 43 patients with metopic synostosis surgically treated between 2004 and 2020. Two different techniques were applied, addressed as technique A and B. Ten patients undergone postoperative 3d stereophotogrammetry were enrolled, and cephalometric measurements were taken and compared to a cohort of unaffected patients matched by age and gender.

Results: Comparison of the groups demonstrated a hypercorrection of the metopic angle of the second technique, associated with a slightly lower correction of the interfrontoparietal diameter. The metopic angle showed to be significantly undercorrected with the first method.

Conclusions: Alternated barrel staving technique appears to be a quick and satisfactory method in cranial remodelling for metopic synostosis. It guarantees an optimal aesthetic result in the first years after surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单中心治疗异位突眼的手术策略:技术说明和结果定量分析。
目的:三颅头畸形是最常见的涉及眼眶的颅脑发育畸形。尽管在手术时机和治疗适应症方面已达成了一定程度的共识,但在保证最佳形态学结果的理想手术技术方面仍未达成共识。本研究旨在描述这两种策略,并通过三维立体摄影测量获得的形态学表面分析,比较两种不同技术的形态学结果:我们对 2004 年至 2020 年间接受手术治疗的 43 例偏头并合症患者进行了回顾性研究。10名患者在术后接受了三维立体摄影测量,头颅测量结果与年龄和性别匹配的未受影响患者进行了比较:结果:两组患者的比较结果表明,第二种技术的偏角校正过度,而额顶间直径的校正略低。结论:交替桶跷跷板技术似乎是一种有效的矫正方法:结论:交替桶状镫骨技术似乎是一种快速、令人满意的颅骨重塑方法,可用于治疗偏侧合眼症。结论:交替桶状镫骨技术是一种快速、令人满意的颅骨重塑方法,可确保术后第一年达到最佳的美学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child's Nervous System
Child's Nervous System 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal has been expanded to encompass all aspects of pediatric neurosciences concerning the developmental and acquired abnormalities of the nervous system and its coverings, functional disorders, epilepsy, spasticity, basic and clinical neuro-oncology, rehabilitation and trauma. Global pediatric neurosurgery is an additional field of interest that will be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Imaging features of pediatric meningiomas: emphasis on unusual locations. Correction: Occipital encephalocele: a retrospective analysis and assessment of post-surgical neurodevelopmental outcome. Radiographic severity is associated with worse executive function in metopic craniosynostosis. Occipital encephalocele: a retrospective analysis and assessment of post-surgical neurodevelopmental outcome. Vaulting further: cranial vault expansion for craniocerebral disproportion without primary craniosynostosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1