Comparative analysis of del Nido cardioplegia versus blood cardioplegia in isolate coronary artery bypass grafting.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1186/s13019-024-02853-1
Soojin Lee, Joon Chul Jung, Hyoung Woo Chang, Jae Hang Lee, Dong Jung Kim, Jun Sung Kim, Cheong Lim
{"title":"Comparative analysis of del Nido cardioplegia versus blood cardioplegia in isolate coronary artery bypass grafting.","authors":"Soojin Lee, Joon Chul Jung, Hyoung Woo Chang, Jae Hang Lee, Dong Jung Kim, Jun Sung Kim, Cheong Lim","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-02853-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examined the efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia compared with traditional blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting by evaluating the early postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 119 patients who underwent isolated conventional coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled and divided into two groups (del Nido cardioplegia group [n = 36] and blood cardioplegia group [n = 50]) based on the type of cardioplegia used. This study compared the preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and early postoperative outcomes. Further subgroup analyses were conducted for high-risk patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30-day mortality and morbidity rates were not significantly different between groups. The del Nido cardioplegia group exhibited advantageous myocardial protection outcomes, demonstrated by a significantly smaller rise in Troponin I levels post-surgery (2.8 [-0.4; 4.2] vs. 4.5 [2.9; 7.4] ng/mL, p = 0.004) and fewer defibrillation attempts during weaning off of cardiopulmonary bypass (0.0 ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 ± 1.1 times, p = 0.011) when compared to the blood cardioplegia group. Additionally, the del Nido group achieved a reduction in surgery duration, as evidenced by the reduced aortic cross-clamping time (64.0 [55.5; 75.5] vs. 77.5 [65.0; 91.0] min, p = 0.001) and total operative time (287.5 [270.0; 305.0] vs. 315.0 [285.0; 365.0] min, p = 0.008). Subgroup analyses consistently demonstrated that the del Nido cardioplegia group had a significantly smaller postoperative increase in Troponin I levels across all subgroups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>del Nido cardioplegia provided myocardial protection and favorable early postoperative outcomes compared to blood cardioplegia, making it a viable option for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Establishing a consensus on the protocol for Del Nido cardioplegia administration in adult surgeries is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11245796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02853-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examined the efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia compared with traditional blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting by evaluating the early postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A total of 119 patients who underwent isolated conventional coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled and divided into two groups (del Nido cardioplegia group [n = 36] and blood cardioplegia group [n = 50]) based on the type of cardioplegia used. This study compared the preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and early postoperative outcomes. Further subgroup analyses were conducted for high-risk patient groups.

Results: The 30-day mortality and morbidity rates were not significantly different between groups. The del Nido cardioplegia group exhibited advantageous myocardial protection outcomes, demonstrated by a significantly smaller rise in Troponin I levels post-surgery (2.8 [-0.4; 4.2] vs. 4.5 [2.9; 7.4] ng/mL, p = 0.004) and fewer defibrillation attempts during weaning off of cardiopulmonary bypass (0.0 ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 ± 1.1 times, p = 0.011) when compared to the blood cardioplegia group. Additionally, the del Nido group achieved a reduction in surgery duration, as evidenced by the reduced aortic cross-clamping time (64.0 [55.5; 75.5] vs. 77.5 [65.0; 91.0] min, p = 0.001) and total operative time (287.5 [270.0; 305.0] vs. 315.0 [285.0; 365.0] min, p = 0.008). Subgroup analyses consistently demonstrated that the del Nido cardioplegia group had a significantly smaller postoperative increase in Troponin I levels across all subgroups (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: del Nido cardioplegia provided myocardial protection and favorable early postoperative outcomes compared to blood cardioplegia, making it a viable option for conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Establishing a consensus on the protocol for Del Nido cardioplegia administration in adult surgeries is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隔离冠状动脉旁路移植术中德尔尼多心脏麻痹与血液心脏麻痹的比较分析。
背景:本研究通过评估术后早期疗效,探讨了德尔尼多心脏麻痹与传统血液心脏麻痹在成人心脏手术分离冠状动脉旁路移植术中的疗效比较:方法:共招募了119名接受分离式常规冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者,并根据使用的心脏麻痹类型分为两组(德尔尼多心脏麻痹组[n = 36]和血液心脏麻痹组[n = 50])。本研究比较了两组患者的术前特征、术中数据和术后早期预后。对高风险患者组进行了进一步的亚组分析:结果:各组 30 天死亡率和发病率无明显差异。del Nido 强心剂组的心肌保护效果更佳,表现为术后肌钙蛋白 I 水平的上升幅度明显较小(2.8 [-0.4; 4.2] vs. 4.5 [2.9; 7.4]纳克/毫升,p = 0.004),而且与血液心脏麻痹组相比,在心肺旁路断流期间尝试除颤的次数更少(0.0 ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 ± 1.1 次,p = 0.011)。此外,del Nido 组缩短了手术时间,表现为缩短了主动脉交叉钳夹时间(64.0 [55.5; 75.5] 分钟 vs. 77.5 [65.0; 91.0] 分钟,p = 0.001)和总手术时间(287.5 [270.0; 305.0] 分钟 vs. 315.0 [285.0; 365.0] 分钟,p = 0.008)。亚组分析一致表明,在所有亚组中,德尔尼多心脏麻痹组术后肌钙蛋白 I 水平的升高明显较小(p 结论:与血液心脏麻痹相比,德尔尼多心脏麻痹可提供心肌保护和良好的术后早期预后,使其成为常规冠状动脉旁路移植术的可行选择。在成人手术中使用德尔尼多心脏麻痹的方案需要达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Single-branched stent-graft with on-table fenestration for the management of zone 2 landing TEVAR with an isolated left vertebral artery: a pilot study Spontaneous avulsion of left internal mammary artery graft a complication of coronary artery bypass surgery: case report and review of the literature “One-stop” interventional therapy for quadricuspid aortic valve combined with severe coronary artery disease: a case report Identification of potential therapeutic targets from bioinformatics analysis of necroptosis and immune infiltration in acute myocardial infarction Application of preset coronary artery orifice patch in Bentall surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1