Maxillary arch dimensions in bilateral cleft lip and palate in the age 0–5 months

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12836
Adriano Porto Peixoto, Felicia Miranda, Rayane de Oliveira Pinto, Tiago Turri de Castro Ribeiro, Franciele Salazar Somensi Lara, Fabrício Monteiro de Castro Machado, Daniela Garib
{"title":"Maxillary arch dimensions in bilateral cleft lip and palate in the age 0–5 months","authors":"Adriano Porto Peixoto,&nbsp;Felicia Miranda,&nbsp;Rayane de Oliveira Pinto,&nbsp;Tiago Turri de Castro Ribeiro,&nbsp;Franciele Salazar Somensi Lara,&nbsp;Fabrício Monteiro de Castro Machado,&nbsp;Daniela Garib","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) divides the maxillary arch into three segments, separated from each other, resulting in abnormal growth of the alveolar arch. This study evaluated the maxillary arch dimensions in BCLP and compared them with neonates without craniofacial anomalies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary cleft centre. Sixty-six neonates aged 0–5 months were divided into two groups: cleft group—children with BCLP (23 boys and 18 girls) and control group—children without craniofacial deformities (15 boys and 10 girls). The dental models were processed by a 3D scanner. Landmarks were marked to achieve inter-canine distance, inter-tuberosity distance and arch length measurements. <i>t</i>-Tests were used for intergroup comparisons (<i>p</i> &lt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The maxillary cleft arch was demonstrated to be wider and longer in the posterior region compared to the control group. The inter-canine distance did not present differences between the cleft and controls. The inter-canine distance of the control group was the only measurement influenced by the variable sex.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The cleft significantly interfered with the arch posterior width and arch sagittal length, making them larger. There was no statistical difference in the measurements between sex in the cleft group.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":"27 6","pages":"903-908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) divides the maxillary arch into three segments, separated from each other, resulting in abnormal growth of the alveolar arch. This study evaluated the maxillary arch dimensions in BCLP and compared them with neonates without craniofacial anomalies.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary cleft centre. Sixty-six neonates aged 0–5 months were divided into two groups: cleft group—children with BCLP (23 boys and 18 girls) and control group—children without craniofacial deformities (15 boys and 10 girls). The dental models were processed by a 3D scanner. Landmarks were marked to achieve inter-canine distance, inter-tuberosity distance and arch length measurements. t-Tests were used for intergroup comparisons (p < .05).

Results

The maxillary cleft arch was demonstrated to be wider and longer in the posterior region compared to the control group. The inter-canine distance did not present differences between the cleft and controls. The inter-canine distance of the control group was the only measurement influenced by the variable sex.

Conclusions

The cleft significantly interfered with the arch posterior width and arch sagittal length, making them larger. There was no statistical difference in the measurements between sex in the cleft group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
0-5 个月双侧唇腭裂患者的上颌腭弓尺寸。
简介完全性双侧唇腭裂(BCLP)将上颌弓分为三段,相互分离,导致牙槽弓发育异常。本研究评估了BCLP患儿的上颌弓尺寸,并将其与无颅面畸形的新生儿进行了比较:这项回顾性研究在一家三级裂隙中心进行。66名0-5个月大的新生儿被分为两组:裂隙组-BCLP患儿(23名男孩和18名女孩)和对照组-无颅面畸形患儿(15名男孩和10名女孩)。牙科模型由三维扫描仪处理。对地标进行标记,以测量犬齿间距、齿槽间距和牙弓长度:与对照组相比,上颌裂隙牙弓后部更宽更长。上颌裂隙组和对照组的犬齿间距没有差异。对照组的犬齿间距是唯一受性别变量影响的测量值:裂隙会明显影响牙弓后宽和牙弓矢状长,使其变大。裂隙组不同性别之间的测量结果没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
In Vitro Biomechanics of Attachment Use and Their Placement for Extrusive Tooth Movement by Aligner Mechanotherapy. Volumetric Assessment of Resorption Patterns of Bilateral Alveolar Clefts in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Two- Stage Bone Graft. Evaluation of External Apical Root Resorption and the Relevance of Intermediate Radiography in Non-Extraction Treatment With Fixed Appliances for Adolescents With Crowding: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Using CBCT. Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of an Anterior Open Bite Treatment Protocol Using Zygomatic Anchorage. Individualised Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: Predictive Models and Anatomical Phenotyping of Mandibular Advancement Devices Responses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1