Assessing MRI referrals’ appropriateness for low back pain post a radiology-initiated intervention

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.002
C.C. Chilanga , M. Heggelund , E. Kjelle
{"title":"Assessing MRI referrals’ appropriateness for low back pain post a radiology-initiated intervention","authors":"C.C. Chilanga ,&nbsp;M. Heggelund ,&nbsp;E. Kjelle","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study evaluated a pilot intervention to reduce low-value Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) referrals for Low Back Pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This before-after intervention study analysed MRI referrals for LBP at two private imaging centres in Norway. MRI referrals for LBP obtained before and after an intervention of information campaigns and sending a return letter to clinicians for declined referrals were evaluated on information, quality, and justification rates. Four radiologists and two radiographers assessed the referrals. A point system was used to calculate referral quality. Each referral was given a score ‘good’ when rated above 5.5 and ‘poor’ below 2.5. Justification was based on assessors categorised rating as justified, unjustified or need more information. Stata Statistical Software (Release 18) was used for analysis. A mixed model analysed variations of the referrals pre- and post-intervention. A p-value of &lt;.05 in variations was considered statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total n = 300 patients’ referrals (150 referrals pre- and post-intervention) were collected and assessed. Post-intervention, 68% of referrals were justified, up from 63% pre-intervention. The assessment showed a 4% decrease in referrals with poor scores and a 2% increase in those rated as good or intermediate quality post-intervention. These changes were not statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It is important to state that it was not possible in our study to identify the subgroup of referrals that are known to be from clinicians who had received a return letter, although the information campaign targeted all referrers. Despite the limitations our findings suggest that providing reasons for declined referrals can serve as an educational tool for clinicians and contribute to the reduction of low value MRI for LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Radiology department initiatives that raise awareness and offer referral criteria guidance to clinicians can serve as valuable educational tools, and further emphasize the importance of providing comprehensive information in MRI referrals for LBP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001767/pdfft?md5=f2a154fc38bbaedbd400a11799067c1c&pid=1-s2.0-S1078817424001767-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluated a pilot intervention to reduce low-value Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) referrals for Low Back Pain (LBP).

Methods

This before-after intervention study analysed MRI referrals for LBP at two private imaging centres in Norway. MRI referrals for LBP obtained before and after an intervention of information campaigns and sending a return letter to clinicians for declined referrals were evaluated on information, quality, and justification rates. Four radiologists and two radiographers assessed the referrals. A point system was used to calculate referral quality. Each referral was given a score ‘good’ when rated above 5.5 and ‘poor’ below 2.5. Justification was based on assessors categorised rating as justified, unjustified or need more information. Stata Statistical Software (Release 18) was used for analysis. A mixed model analysed variations of the referrals pre- and post-intervention. A p-value of <.05 in variations was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total n = 300 patients’ referrals (150 referrals pre- and post-intervention) were collected and assessed. Post-intervention, 68% of referrals were justified, up from 63% pre-intervention. The assessment showed a 4% decrease in referrals with poor scores and a 2% increase in those rated as good or intermediate quality post-intervention. These changes were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

It is important to state that it was not possible in our study to identify the subgroup of referrals that are known to be from clinicians who had received a return letter, although the information campaign targeted all referrers. Despite the limitations our findings suggest that providing reasons for declined referrals can serve as an educational tool for clinicians and contribute to the reduction of low value MRI for LBP.

Implications for practice

Radiology department initiatives that raise awareness and offer referral criteria guidance to clinicians can serve as valuable educational tools, and further emphasize the importance of providing comprehensive information in MRI referrals for LBP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估放射科发起干预后腰背痛 MRI 转诊的适当性。
简介:本研究评估了一项试点干预措施,旨在减少腰痛患者的低价值磁共振成像(MRI)转诊:本研究评估了一项旨在减少低价值腰背痛(LBP)磁共振成像(MRI)转诊的试点干预措施:这项前后干预研究分析了挪威两家私人影像中心的腰背痛磁共振成像转诊情况。在开展信息宣传活动和向被拒绝转诊的临床医生发送回信等干预措施前后,对腰背痛的核磁共振转诊信息、质量和合理率进行了评估。四名放射科医生和两名放射技师对转诊进行了评估。转诊质量采用积分制计算。每份转诊报告在 5.5 分以上为 "好",2.5 分以下为 "差"。转诊的合理性根据评估者的评分分为合理、不合理或需要更多信息。使用 Stata 统计软件(第 18 版)进行分析。混合模型分析了干预前后转介情况的变化。结果共收集并评估了 n = 300 例患者转介(干预前后各 150 例)。干预后,68% 的转诊是合理的,高于干预前的 63%。评估结果显示,干预后得分较低的转诊病例减少了 4%,被评为良好或中等质量的转诊病例增加了 2%。这些变化没有统计学意义:需要说明的是,在我们的研究中,虽然信息宣传活动针对的是所有转介人,但无法确定已知转介人中收到回信的临床医生。尽管存在这些局限性,但我们的研究结果表明,提供拒绝转诊的原因可作为临床医生的教育工具,并有助于减少低价值的腰椎间盘突出症磁共振成像检查:对实践的启示:放射科向临床医生宣传并提供转诊标准指导的举措可作为有价值的教育工具,并进一步强调在腰椎间盘突出症的 MRI 转诊中提供全面信息的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
CT metal artefact reduction for hip and shoulder implants using novel algorithms and machine learning: A systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses Clinical insights into cross-sectional imaging integration in radiography education Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography procedures: A systematic review “Making it work in the face of extreme adversity” - Exploring perceptions for the future of the imaging and oncology workforce using ‘soundbite’ interviews Radiographer Education and Learning in Artificial Intelligence (REAL-AI): A survey of radiographers, radiologists, and students’ knowledge of and attitude to education on AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1