Patient-Provider Communication and Access, Use, and Financial Burden of Care.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.004
Sungchul Park, David D Kim
{"title":"Patient-Provider Communication and Access, Use, and Financial Burden of Care.","authors":"Sungchul Park, David D Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective patient-provider communication is a critical component of optimal patient care, but its potential impact on the delivery of healthcare services remains unclear. This study examines the association of patient-provider communication with access to care, healthcare utilization, and financial burden of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2013-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey longitudinal data, the level of patient-provider communication was measured across four domains (attentive listening, clear explanation, respectfulness, and time allocation) as a primary independent variable, categorized into low, moderate, and high. A lagged dependent model was employed to examine the associations of patient-provider communication at baseline with subsequent access to care, healthcare utilization, and financial burden of care, controlling for baseline sample characteristics and outcomes measured at the baseline. Analysis was conducted in February 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 28,955 analytic samples (representing 709,547,678 U.S. adults), 5.3%, 50.2%, and 44.3% reported low, moderate, and high levels of patient-provider communication. Marginalized populations, including racial/ethnic minorities, those with low education and income, and those lacking insurance, were more likely to report low patient-provider communication. Compared with adults with high patient-provider communication, those with low patient-provider communication were more likely to encounter difficulties in accessing medical care (2.6 percentage points; 95% CI: 1.2-3.9), experience delays in obtaining necessary medical care (2.8 percentage points; 1.3-4.4), have emergency room visits (4.2 percentage points; 1.9-6.4), and face difficulties paying medical bills (4.0 percentage points; 2.2-5.8) in the subsequent year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Encouraging effective patient-provider communication is essential for advancing patient-centered care and mitigating health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective patient-provider communication is a critical component of optimal patient care, but its potential impact on the delivery of healthcare services remains unclear. This study examines the association of patient-provider communication with access to care, healthcare utilization, and financial burden of care.

Methods: Using the 2013-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey longitudinal data, the level of patient-provider communication was measured across four domains (attentive listening, clear explanation, respectfulness, and time allocation) as a primary independent variable, categorized into low, moderate, and high. A lagged dependent model was employed to examine the associations of patient-provider communication at baseline with subsequent access to care, healthcare utilization, and financial burden of care, controlling for baseline sample characteristics and outcomes measured at the baseline. Analysis was conducted in February 2024.

Results: Among 28,955 analytic samples (representing 709,547,678 U.S. adults), 5.3%, 50.2%, and 44.3% reported low, moderate, and high levels of patient-provider communication. Marginalized populations, including racial/ethnic minorities, those with low education and income, and those lacking insurance, were more likely to report low patient-provider communication. Compared with adults with high patient-provider communication, those with low patient-provider communication were more likely to encounter difficulties in accessing medical care (2.6 percentage points; 95% CI: 1.2-3.9), experience delays in obtaining necessary medical care (2.8 percentage points; 1.3-4.4), have emergency room visits (4.2 percentage points; 1.9-6.4), and face difficulties paying medical bills (4.0 percentage points; 2.2-5.8) in the subsequent year.

Conclusions: Encouraging effective patient-provider communication is essential for advancing patient-centered care and mitigating health inequities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通以及医疗服务的获取、使用和经济负担。
介绍:有效的医患沟通是优化患者护理的重要组成部分,但其对提供医疗服务的潜在影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了患者与医护人员沟通与获得医疗服务、医疗服务利用率以及医疗服务经济负担之间的关系:方法:利用 2013-2021 年医疗支出小组调查的纵向数据,从四个方面(用心倾听、清晰解释、尊重和时间分配)衡量患者与医护人员的沟通水平,并将其作为主要自变量,分为低、中、高三个等级。在控制基线样本特征和基线测量结果的前提下,我们采用了一个滞后因果关系模型来检验基线时患者与医疗服务提供者的沟通与后续医疗服务的获得、医疗服务的使用和医疗服务的经济负担之间的关系。分析于 2024 年 2 月进行:在 28,955 个分析样本(代表 709,547,678 名美国成年人)中,5.3%、50.2% 和 44.3% 的样本报告了患者与医护人员沟通的低度、中度和高度水平。边缘化人群,包括少数种族/族裔、低学历和低收入人群以及没有保险的人群,更有可能报告患者与医疗服务提供者沟通水平低。与患者-医患沟通程度高的成年人相比,患者-医患沟通程度低的成年人在随后一年中更有可能在获得医疗护理方面遇到困难(2.6 个百分点;95% CI:1.2-3.9),在获得必要的医疗护理方面遇到延误(2.8 个百分点;1.3-4.4),在急诊室就诊(4.2 个百分点;1.9-6.4),以及在支付医疗账单方面遇到困难(4.0 个百分点;2.2-5.8):鼓励患者与医疗服务提供者进行有效沟通对于促进以患者为中心的医疗服务和减少医疗不公平现象至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Opioid Use Following Implementation of Oregon's Medicaid Back Pain Policy. Clinician response to the 2021 USPSTF recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in average risk adults aged 45-49 years. Cost-effectiveness of mandating calorie labels on prepared foods in supermarkets. Disparities in tobacco smoking and risk of cardiovascular disease in people with low socioeconomic status or serious psychological distress: A simulation analysis. Factors associated with mental healthcare utilization among United States military personnel with posttraumatic stress disorder or depression symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1