{"title":"Gubernaculum-sparing orchiopexy versus gubernaculum excision; A randomized trial on success and atrophy rates","authors":"Reza Abbasion , Mahdi Mottaghi , Parisa Saeidi Sharifabad , Masoud Mahdavi Rashed , Hassan Mehrad-Majd , Mohammadhadi Mohammadzadeh Rezaei","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.06.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><div>Previous studies showed that extra blood supply<span><span> can decrease testicular atrophy following laparoscopic </span>orchiopexy. We evaluated the impact of preserving the gubernacular attachment (which contains blood supply from cremasteric artery and its anastomoses) on atrophy rates following open conventional orchiopexy.</span></div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div><span>This double-blinded randomized trial was implemented from March 2022 to September 2023. Included boys with non-palpable testis, even with examination under anesthesia, underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to evaluate the testis's location and size. Nubbin testes and those with > 2-cm distance from the internal inguinal ring. Participants were assigned into two groups (gubernaculum sparing (GS) and excision (GE)) by permuted block randomization. Overall success was defined as achieving both morphologic success (atrophy <20% of the intraoperative size) and anatomical success (scrotal or high-scrotal locations). Boys were followed at three- and six-month post-surgery via ultrasound. Independent t-test, repeated ANOVA, and </span>Friedman's tests were used where appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 92 boys (105 UDTs overall), 75 testes (36 in GS, 39 in GE groups) were used in the analysis. The mean age of participants was 25 ± 17 months (range 6–84). The mean testis size of cases intraoperatively was 460 ± 226, 396 ± 166, and 520 ± 258 mm<sup>3</sup> among all participants, GS, and GE cases, respectively. Both groups showed a significant decrease in testicular volume on both follow-up checkpoints, but this decrement was significantly higher in the GE group (<em>p</em> < 0.001). The anatomical success rate was significantly higher among GS boys (97.2% versus 82.1%; <em>p</em> = 0.038). The overall success rate was significantly higher for the GS group (61.1% versus 25.6%; <em>p</em> = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although mean testicular volume decreased in both groups, we found superior morphologic and overall success rates among the GS group. The greatest size reduction was noted at the three-month post-surgery compared to the six-month checkpoint.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div><span><span>https://irct.ir/trial/58842</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.<span><figure><span><img><ol><li><span><span>Download: <span>Download high-res image (385KB)</span></span></span></li><li><span><span>Download: <span>Download full-size image</span></span></span></li></ol></span><span><span><p><span>Summary figure</span>. </p></span></span></figure></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":"20 5","pages":"Pages 969-976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477513124003504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objective
Previous studies showed that extra blood supply can decrease testicular atrophy following laparoscopic orchiopexy. We evaluated the impact of preserving the gubernacular attachment (which contains blood supply from cremasteric artery and its anastomoses) on atrophy rates following open conventional orchiopexy.
Study design
This double-blinded randomized trial was implemented from March 2022 to September 2023. Included boys with non-palpable testis, even with examination under anesthesia, underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to evaluate the testis's location and size. Nubbin testes and those with > 2-cm distance from the internal inguinal ring. Participants were assigned into two groups (gubernaculum sparing (GS) and excision (GE)) by permuted block randomization. Overall success was defined as achieving both morphologic success (atrophy <20% of the intraoperative size) and anatomical success (scrotal or high-scrotal locations). Boys were followed at three- and six-month post-surgery via ultrasound. Independent t-test, repeated ANOVA, and Friedman's tests were used where appropriate.
Results
Of 92 boys (105 UDTs overall), 75 testes (36 in GS, 39 in GE groups) were used in the analysis. The mean age of participants was 25 ± 17 months (range 6–84). The mean testis size of cases intraoperatively was 460 ± 226, 396 ± 166, and 520 ± 258 mm3 among all participants, GS, and GE cases, respectively. Both groups showed a significant decrease in testicular volume on both follow-up checkpoints, but this decrement was significantly higher in the GE group (p < 0.001). The anatomical success rate was significantly higher among GS boys (97.2% versus 82.1%; p = 0.038). The overall success rate was significantly higher for the GS group (61.1% versus 25.6%; p = 0.002).
Conclusion
Although mean testicular volume decreased in both groups, we found superior morphologic and overall success rates among the GS group. The greatest size reduction was noted at the three-month post-surgery compared to the six-month checkpoint.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review.
It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty.
It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals.
It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty.
It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.