Gubernaculum-sparing orchiopexy versus gubernaculum excision; A randomized trial on success and atrophy rates

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.06.041
{"title":"Gubernaculum-sparing orchiopexy versus gubernaculum excision; A randomized trial on success and atrophy rates","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.06.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objective</h3><div>Previous studies showed that extra blood supply<span><span> can decrease testicular atrophy following laparoscopic </span>orchiopexy. We evaluated the impact of preserving the gubernacular attachment (which contains blood supply from cremasteric artery and its anastomoses) on atrophy rates following open conventional orchiopexy.</span></div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div><span>This double-blinded randomized trial was implemented from March 2022 to September 2023. Included boys with non-palpable testis, even with examination under anesthesia, underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to evaluate the testis's location and size. Nubbin testes and those with &gt; 2-cm distance from the internal inguinal ring. Participants were assigned into two groups (gubernaculum sparing (GS) and excision (GE)) by permuted block randomization. Overall success was defined as achieving both morphologic success (atrophy &lt;20% of the intraoperative size) and anatomical success (scrotal or high-scrotal locations). Boys were followed at three- and six-month post-surgery via ultrasound. Independent t-test, repeated ANOVA, and </span>Friedman's tests were used where appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 92 boys (105 UDTs overall), 75 testes (36 in GS, 39 in GE groups) were used in the analysis. The mean age of participants was 25 ± 17 months (range 6–84). The mean testis size of cases intraoperatively was 460 ± 226, 396 ± 166, and 520 ± 258 mm<sup>3</sup> among all participants, GS, and GE cases, respectively. Both groups showed a significant decrease in testicular volume on both follow-up checkpoints, but this decrement was significantly higher in the GE group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The anatomical success rate was significantly higher among GS boys (97.2% versus 82.1%; <em>p</em> = 0.038). The overall success rate was significantly higher for the GS group (61.1% versus 25.6%; <em>p</em> = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although mean testicular volume decreased in both groups, we found superior morphologic and overall success rates among the GS group. The greatest size reduction was noted at the three-month post-surgery compared to the six-month checkpoint.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div><span><span>https://irct.ir/trial/58842</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.<span><figure><span><img><ol><li><span><span>Download: <span>Download high-res image (385KB)</span></span></span></li><li><span><span>Download: <span>Download full-size image</span></span></span></li></ol></span><span><span><p><span>Summary figure</span>. </p></span></span></figure></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477513124003504","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective

Previous studies showed that extra blood supply can decrease testicular atrophy following laparoscopic orchiopexy. We evaluated the impact of preserving the gubernacular attachment (which contains blood supply from cremasteric artery and its anastomoses) on atrophy rates following open conventional orchiopexy.

Study design

This double-blinded randomized trial was implemented from March 2022 to September 2023. Included boys with non-palpable testis, even with examination under anesthesia, underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to evaluate the testis's location and size. Nubbin testes and those with > 2-cm distance from the internal inguinal ring. Participants were assigned into two groups (gubernaculum sparing (GS) and excision (GE)) by permuted block randomization. Overall success was defined as achieving both morphologic success (atrophy <20% of the intraoperative size) and anatomical success (scrotal or high-scrotal locations). Boys were followed at three- and six-month post-surgery via ultrasound. Independent t-test, repeated ANOVA, and Friedman's tests were used where appropriate.

Results

Of 92 boys (105 UDTs overall), 75 testes (36 in GS, 39 in GE groups) were used in the analysis. The mean age of participants was 25 ± 17 months (range 6–84). The mean testis size of cases intraoperatively was 460 ± 226, 396 ± 166, and 520 ± 258 mm3 among all participants, GS, and GE cases, respectively. Both groups showed a significant decrease in testicular volume on both follow-up checkpoints, but this decrement was significantly higher in the GE group (p < 0.001). The anatomical success rate was significantly higher among GS boys (97.2% versus 82.1%; p = 0.038). The overall success rate was significantly higher for the GS group (61.1% versus 25.6%; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Although mean testicular volume decreased in both groups, we found superior morphologic and overall success rates among the GS group. The greatest size reduction was noted at the three-month post-surgery compared to the six-month checkpoint.

Trial registration

https://irct.ir/trial/58842.
  1. Download: Download high-res image (385KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Summary figure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留肛门括约肌与肛门括约肌切除术;关于成功率和萎缩率的随机试验
之前的研究表明,腹腔镜睾丸环切术后,额外的血液供应可减少睾丸萎缩。我们评估了在开放式传统睾丸吻合术后保留睾丸粘膜附件(包含来自嵴动脉及其吻合处的血液供应)对萎缩率的影响。这项双盲随机试验于 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 9 月进行。纳入的睾丸无法触及的男孩,即使在麻醉状态下进行了检查,也要接受诊断性腹腔镜检查,以评估睾丸的位置和大小。睾丸有凹陷,且与腹股沟内环的距离大于 2 厘米。通过随机排列法将参与者分为两组(疏通睾丸(GS)组和切除睾丸(GE)组)。总体成功定义为形态学成功(萎缩<术中大小的20%)和解剖学成功(阴囊或阴囊高位)。手术后三个月和六个月,通过超声波对男孩进行随访。在适当的情况下采用独立 t 检验、重复方差分析和弗里德曼检验。在 92 名男孩(总计 105 个 UDT)中,75 个睾丸(GS 组 36 个,GE 组 39 个)被用于分析。参与者的平均年龄为 25 ± 17 个月(6-84 个月)。所有参与者、GS 组和 GE 组病例术中睾丸的平均大小分别为 460 ± 226 毫米、396 ± 166 毫米和 520 ± 258 毫米。两组患者的睾丸体积在两个随访检查点上都有明显下降,但GE组的下降幅度明显更大(< 0.001)。GS男孩的解剖成功率明显更高(97.2%对82.1%;=0.038)。GS组的总体成功率明显更高(61.1% 对 25.6%; = 0.002)。虽然两组的平均睾丸体积都有所缩小,但我们发现 GS 组的形态学和总体成功率更高。与六个月的检查点相比,手术后三个月的体积缩小幅度最大。.[显示省略]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial Board Ovotesticular cords and ovotesticular follicles: New histologic markers for human ovotesticular syndrome Comparing binary & ordinal definitions of urinary & stool continence outcomes: Data from the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry Contemporary disparities in progression to orchiopexy for cryptorchidism as reported in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1