Identifying a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets: Implications for divorce education

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1111/fcre.12808
Jonathon J. Beckmeyer, Luke T. Russell
{"title":"Identifying a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets: Implications for divorce education","authors":"Jonathon J. Beckmeyer,&nbsp;Luke T. Russell","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Divorce education programs seek to provide parents with information about various aspects of the divorce process, its consequences, and strategies for successful adjustment. Within those broad content areas, however, there are myriad of potential promotive-, protective-, and risk-factors that programs could address. Thus, divorce education programs could benefit from further guidance about the content areas divorcing parents may find the most helpful. In the present study we aimed to describe what divorced parents felt had helped their families throughout the divorce process. We did so to promote further alignment between divorce education program content and what parents have found helpful. Specifically, we identified a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets. Our findings suggest that though a plurality of divorcing parents benefit from a wide range of legal/professional, former spouse, and personal assets, the majority rely predominately upon their own parenting skills and resources, or perceive few beneficial assets to draw on. We contend divorce educators should consider incorporating further information on developing personal parenting skills or resources, and skillfully navigating legal or therapeutic systems, to further complement existing curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"455-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Divorce education programs seek to provide parents with information about various aspects of the divorce process, its consequences, and strategies for successful adjustment. Within those broad content areas, however, there are myriad of potential promotive-, protective-, and risk-factors that programs could address. Thus, divorce education programs could benefit from further guidance about the content areas divorcing parents may find the most helpful. In the present study we aimed to describe what divorced parents felt had helped their families throughout the divorce process. We did so to promote further alignment between divorce education program content and what parents have found helpful. Specifically, we identified a typology of helpful post-divorce family assets. Our findings suggest that though a plurality of divorcing parents benefit from a wide range of legal/professional, former spouse, and personal assets, the majority rely predominately upon their own parenting skills and resources, or perceive few beneficial assets to draw on. We contend divorce educators should consider incorporating further information on developing personal parenting skills or resources, and skillfully navigating legal or therapeutic systems, to further complement existing curricula.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定离婚后有用家庭财产的类型:对离婚教育的影响
离婚教育计划旨在为父母提供有关离婚过程、离婚后果和成功适应策略等各方面的信息。然而,在这些广泛的内容领域中,还有无数潜在的促进因素、保护因素和风险因素,这些都是离婚教育计划可以解决的问题。因此,离婚教育计划可以从离婚父母认为最有帮助的内容领域的进一步指导中获益。在本研究中,我们旨在描述离婚父母认为在整个离婚过程中对其家庭有帮助的内容。我们这样做是为了促进离婚教育计划内容与父母认为有帮助的内容之间的进一步协调。具体来说,我们确定了离婚后家庭有益资产的类型。我们的研究结果表明,虽然大多数离婚父母都受益于各种法律/专业、前配偶和个人资产,但大多数父母主要依靠自己的育儿技能和资源,或者认为可利用的有益资产很少。我们认为,离婚教育工作者应考虑纳入更多有关发展个人育儿技能或资源以及巧妙驾驭法律或治疗系统的信息,以进一步补充现有课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A call to action: Every family deserves active efforts. Keeping the black family together-active efforts as the standard for all removal and reunification efforts Cheating the evidence to get to best interest and the presumption of unfitness Lies my child welfare system has told me: The critical importance of centering families' voices in family policing legal advocacy Unbundling marriage law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1