Forecasting short- and medium-term streamflow using stacked ensemble models and different meta-learners

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1007/s00477-024-02760-w
Francesco Granata, Fabio Di Nunno
{"title":"Forecasting short- and medium-term streamflow using stacked ensemble models and different meta-learners","authors":"Francesco Granata, Fabio Di Nunno","doi":"10.1007/s00477-024-02760-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Streamflow forecasting holds a pivotal role in the effective management of water resources, flood control, hydropower generation, agricultural planning, and environmental conservation.</p><p>This study assessed the effectiveness of a stacked Multilayer Perceptron-Random Forest (MLP-RF) ensemble model for short- to medium-term (7 to 15 days ahead) daily streamflow forecasts in the UK. The stacked model combines MLP and RF, enhancing generalization by capturing complex nonlinear relationships and robustness to noisy data. Stacking reduces bias and variance by aggregating predictions and addressing differing sources of bias and variance in MLP and RF. Furthermore, this ensemble model is computationally inexpensive. The study also examined the impact of different meta-learner algorithms, Elastic Net (EN), Isotonic Regression (IR), Pace Regression (PR), and Radial Basis Function (RBF) Neural Networks, on model performance.</p><p>For 1-day ahead forecasts, all models performed well (Kling Gupta efficiency, KGE, from 0.921 to 0.985, mean absolute percentage error, MAPE, from 3.59 to 13.02%), with minimal impact from the choice of meta-learner. At 7-day ahead forecasts, satisfactory results were obtained (KGE from 0.876 to 0.963, MAPE from 11.53 to 24.55%), while at the 15-day horizon, accuracy remained reasonable (KGE from 0.82 to 0.961, MAPE from 18.31 to 34.38%). The RBF meta-learner generally led to more accurate predictions, particularly affecting low and peak flow rates. RBF consistently outperformed in predicting low flow rates, while EN excelled in predicting flood flow rates in many cases. For estimating total discharged water volume, all models exhibited low relative error (&lt; 0.08).</p>","PeriodicalId":21987,"journal":{"name":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02760-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Streamflow forecasting holds a pivotal role in the effective management of water resources, flood control, hydropower generation, agricultural planning, and environmental conservation.

This study assessed the effectiveness of a stacked Multilayer Perceptron-Random Forest (MLP-RF) ensemble model for short- to medium-term (7 to 15 days ahead) daily streamflow forecasts in the UK. The stacked model combines MLP and RF, enhancing generalization by capturing complex nonlinear relationships and robustness to noisy data. Stacking reduces bias and variance by aggregating predictions and addressing differing sources of bias and variance in MLP and RF. Furthermore, this ensemble model is computationally inexpensive. The study also examined the impact of different meta-learner algorithms, Elastic Net (EN), Isotonic Regression (IR), Pace Regression (PR), and Radial Basis Function (RBF) Neural Networks, on model performance.

For 1-day ahead forecasts, all models performed well (Kling Gupta efficiency, KGE, from 0.921 to 0.985, mean absolute percentage error, MAPE, from 3.59 to 13.02%), with minimal impact from the choice of meta-learner. At 7-day ahead forecasts, satisfactory results were obtained (KGE from 0.876 to 0.963, MAPE from 11.53 to 24.55%), while at the 15-day horizon, accuracy remained reasonable (KGE from 0.82 to 0.961, MAPE from 18.31 to 34.38%). The RBF meta-learner generally led to more accurate predictions, particularly affecting low and peak flow rates. RBF consistently outperformed in predicting low flow rates, while EN excelled in predicting flood flow rates in many cases. For estimating total discharged water volume, all models exhibited low relative error (< 0.08).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用叠加集合模型和不同的元学习器预测中短期河水流量
本研究评估了多层感知器-随机森林(MLP-RF)叠加模型在英国中短期(提前 7 至 15 天)日流量预报中的有效性。堆叠模型结合了 MLP 和 RF,通过捕捉复杂的非线性关系和对噪声数据的鲁棒性来增强泛化能力。堆叠模型通过汇总预测结果,并解决 MLP 和 RF 中不同的偏差和方差来源,减少了偏差和方差。此外,这种集合模型的计算成本很低。研究还考察了不同元学习算法(弹性网(EN)、等效回归(IR)、步调回归(PR)和径向基函数(RBF)神经网络)对模型性能的影响。对于提前 1 天的预测,所有模型都表现良好(Kling Gupta 效率,KGE,从 0.921 到 0.985;平均绝对百分比误差,MAPE,从 3.59 到 13.02%),元学习算法的选择对其影响很小。提前 7 天预测的结果令人满意(KGE 从 0.876 到 0.963,MAPE 从 11.53 到 24.55%),而提前 15 天预测的准确率仍然合理(KGE 从 0.82 到 0.961,MAPE 从 18.31 到 34.38%)。RBF 元学习器的预测通常更为准确,尤其是在影响低流量和峰值流量时。RBF 在预测小流量方面一直表现出色,而 EN 在许多情况下在预测洪峰流量方面表现出色。在估计总排水量方面,所有模型都表现出较低的相对误差(0.08)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA) will publish research papers, reviews and technical notes on stochastic and probabilistic approaches to environmental sciences and engineering, including interactions of earth and atmospheric environments with people and ecosystems. The basic idea is to bring together research papers on stochastic modelling in various fields of environmental sciences and to provide an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas, for communicating on issues that cut across disciplinary barriers, and for the dissemination of stochastic techniques used in different fields to the community of interested researchers. Original contributions will be considered dealing with modelling (theoretical and computational), measurements and instrumentation in one or more of the following topical areas: - Spatiotemporal analysis and mapping of natural processes. - Enviroinformatics. - Environmental risk assessment, reliability analysis and decision making. - Surface and subsurface hydrology and hydraulics. - Multiphase porous media domains and contaminant transport modelling. - Hazardous waste site characterization. - Stochastic turbulence and random hydrodynamic fields. - Chaotic and fractal systems. - Random waves and seafloor morphology. - Stochastic atmospheric and climate processes. - Air pollution and quality assessment research. - Modern geostatistics. - Mechanisms of pollutant formation, emission, exposure and absorption. - Physical, chemical and biological analysis of human exposure from single and multiple media and routes; control and protection. - Bioinformatics. - Probabilistic methods in ecology and population biology. - Epidemiological investigations. - Models using stochastic differential equations stochastic or partial differential equations. - Hazardous waste site characterization.
期刊最新文献
Hybrid method for rainfall-induced regional landslide susceptibility mapping Prediction of urban flood inundation using Bayesian convolutional neural networks Unravelling complexities: a study on geopolitical dynamics, economic complexity, R&D impact on green innovation in China AHP and FAHP-based multi-criteria analysis for suitable dam location analysis: a case study of the Bagmati Basin, Nepal Risk and retraction: asymmetric nexus between monetary policy uncertainty and eco-friendly investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1