Semi-supervised Double Deep Learning Temporal Risk Prediction (SeDDLeR) with Electronic Health Records

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Biomedical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104685
Isabelle-Emmanuella Nogues , Jun Wen , Yihan Zhao , Clara-Lea Bonzel , Victor M. Castro , Yucong Lin , Shike Xu , Jue Hou , Tianxi Cai
{"title":"Semi-supervised Double Deep Learning Temporal Risk Prediction (SeDDLeR) with Electronic Health Records","authors":"Isabelle-Emmanuella Nogues ,&nbsp;Jun Wen ,&nbsp;Yihan Zhao ,&nbsp;Clara-Lea Bonzel ,&nbsp;Victor M. Castro ,&nbsp;Yucong Lin ,&nbsp;Shike Xu ,&nbsp;Jue Hou ,&nbsp;Tianxi Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><p>Risk prediction plays a crucial role in planning for prevention, monitoring, and treatment. Electronic Health Records (EHRs) offer an expansive repository of temporal medical data encompassing both risk factors and outcome indicators essential for effective risk prediction. However, challenges emerge due to the lack of readily available gold-standard outcomes and the complex effects of various risk factors. Compounding these challenges are the false positives in diagnosis codes, and formidable task of pinpointing the onset timing in annotations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>We develop a <strong>Se</strong>mi-supervised <strong>D</strong>ouble <strong>D</strong>eep <strong>Le</strong>arning Temporal <strong>R</strong>isk Prediction (SeDDLeR) algorithm based on extensive unlabeled longitudinal Electronic Health Records (EHR) data augmented by a limited set of gold standard labels on the binary status information indicating whether the clinical event of interest occurred during the follow-up period.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>The SeDDLeR algorithm calculates an individualized risk of developing future clinical events over time using each patient’s baseline EHR features via the following steps: (1) construction of an initial EHR-derived surrogate as a proxy for the onset status; (2) deep learning calibration of the surrogate along gold-standard onset status; and (3) semi-supervised deep learning for risk prediction combining calibrated surrogates and gold-standard onset status. To account for missing onset time and heterogeneous follow-up, we introduce temporal kernel weighting. We devise a Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) module to capture temporal characteristics. We subsequently assess our proposed SeDDLeR method in simulation studies and apply the method to the Massachusetts General Brigham (MGB) Biobank to predict type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>SeDDLeR outperforms benchmark risk prediction methods, including Semi-parametric Transformation Model (STM) and DeepHit, with consistently best accuracy across experiments. SeDDLeR achieved the best C-statistics ( 0.815, SE 0.023; vs STM +.084, SE 0.030, <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span>-value .004; vs DeepHit +.055, SE 0.027, <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span>-value .024) and best average time-specific AUC (0.778, SE 0.022; vs STM + 0.059, SE 0.039, <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span>-value .067; vs DeepHit + 0.168, SE 0.032, <span><math><mi>P</mi></math></span>-value <span><math><mo>&lt;</mo></math></span>0.001) in the MGB T2D study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>SeDDLeR can train robust risk prediction models in both real-world EHR and synthetic datasets with minimal requirements of labeling event times. It holds the potential to be incorporated for future clinical trial recruitment or clinical decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 104685"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

Risk prediction plays a crucial role in planning for prevention, monitoring, and treatment. Electronic Health Records (EHRs) offer an expansive repository of temporal medical data encompassing both risk factors and outcome indicators essential for effective risk prediction. However, challenges emerge due to the lack of readily available gold-standard outcomes and the complex effects of various risk factors. Compounding these challenges are the false positives in diagnosis codes, and formidable task of pinpointing the onset timing in annotations.

Objective:

We develop a Semi-supervised Double Deep Learning Temporal Risk Prediction (SeDDLeR) algorithm based on extensive unlabeled longitudinal Electronic Health Records (EHR) data augmented by a limited set of gold standard labels on the binary status information indicating whether the clinical event of interest occurred during the follow-up period.

Methods:

The SeDDLeR algorithm calculates an individualized risk of developing future clinical events over time using each patient’s baseline EHR features via the following steps: (1) construction of an initial EHR-derived surrogate as a proxy for the onset status; (2) deep learning calibration of the surrogate along gold-standard onset status; and (3) semi-supervised deep learning for risk prediction combining calibrated surrogates and gold-standard onset status. To account for missing onset time and heterogeneous follow-up, we introduce temporal kernel weighting. We devise a Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) module to capture temporal characteristics. We subsequently assess our proposed SeDDLeR method in simulation studies and apply the method to the Massachusetts General Brigham (MGB) Biobank to predict type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk.

Results:

SeDDLeR outperforms benchmark risk prediction methods, including Semi-parametric Transformation Model (STM) and DeepHit, with consistently best accuracy across experiments. SeDDLeR achieved the best C-statistics ( 0.815, SE 0.023; vs STM +.084, SE 0.030, P-value .004; vs DeepHit +.055, SE 0.027, P-value .024) and best average time-specific AUC (0.778, SE 0.022; vs STM + 0.059, SE 0.039, P-value .067; vs DeepHit + 0.168, SE 0.032, P-value <0.001) in the MGB T2D study.

Conclusion:

SeDDLeR can train robust risk prediction models in both real-world EHR and synthetic datasets with minimal requirements of labeling event times. It holds the potential to be incorporated for future clinical trial recruitment or clinical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电子健康记录的半监督双深度学习时空风险预测 (SeDDLeR)。
背景:风险预测在预防、监测和治疗计划中起着至关重要的作用。电子健康记录(EHR)提供了一个庞大的时间医疗数据储存库,其中包含了有效风险预测所必需的风险因素和结果指标。然而,由于缺乏现成的黄金标准结果以及各种风险因素的复杂影响,挑战也随之而来。诊断代码中的假阳性以及在注释中精确定位发病时间的艰巨任务也加剧了这些挑战:我们开发了一种半监督双深度学习时空风险预测(SeDDLeR)算法,该算法基于大量无标记的纵向电子健康记录(EHR)数据,并在二进制状态信息上添加了一组有限的金标准标签,表明相关临床事件是否在随访期间发生:SeDDLeR 算法利用每位患者的基线 EHR 特征,通过以下步骤计算出随着时间推移未来发生临床事件的个体化风险:(1)构建初始 EHR 衍生代用指标,作为发病状态的替代指标;(2)根据黄金标准发病状态对代用指标进行深度学习校准;(3)结合校准后的代用指标和黄金标准发病状态进行半监督深度学习风险预测。为了考虑缺失的发病时间和异质性随访,我们引入了时间核加权。我们设计了一个门控循环单元(GRUs)模块来捕捉时间特征。我们随后在模拟研究中评估了我们提出的 SeDDLeR 方法,并将该方法应用于马萨诸塞州布里格姆将军(MGB)生物库,以预测 2 型糖尿病(T2D)风险:SeDDLeR优于基准风险预测方法,包括半参数转换模型(STM)和DeepHit,在所有实验中始终保持最佳准确性。SeDDLeR 获得了最佳 C 统计量(0.815,SE 0.023;vs STM +.084,SE 0.030,P-value .004;vs DeepHit +.055,SE 0.027,P-value .024)和最佳特定时间平均 AUC(0.778,SE 0.022;vs STM +0.059,SE 0.039,P-value .067;vs DeepHit +0.168,SE 0.032,P-value 结论:SeDDLeR 可以在真实 EHR 和合成数据集中训练稳健的风险预测模型,而且对标注事件时间的要求极低。它有望用于未来的临床试验招募或临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
期刊最新文献
Early multi-cancer detection through deep learning: An anomaly detection approach using Variational Autoencoder. Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data Cross-Modal self-supervised vision language pre-training with multiple objectives for medical visual question answering Machine learning approaches for the discovery of clinical pathways from patient data: A systematic review MultiADE: A Multi-domain benchmark for Adverse Drug Event extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1