Health-related quality of life in ethnically diverse Black prostate cancer survivors: a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03718-9
Motolani E Ogunsanya, Ernest Kaninjing, Tanara N Ellis, Daniel J Morton, Andrew G McIntosh, Jian Zhao, Sabrina L Dickey, Darla E Kendzor, Kathleen Dwyer, Mary Ellen Young, Folakemi T Odedina
{"title":"Health-related quality of life in ethnically diverse Black prostate cancer survivors: a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach.","authors":"Motolani E Ogunsanya, Ernest Kaninjing, Tanara N Ellis, Daniel J Morton, Andrew G McIntosh, Jian Zhao, Sabrina L Dickey, Darla E Kendzor, Kathleen Dwyer, Mary Ellen Young, Folakemi T Odedina","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03718-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among ethnically diverse Black men (BM) with prostate cancer (CaP) in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent parallel mixed-methods design, employing both qualitative and quantitative research, involved recruiting Black CaP survivors through multiple channels. The target population was native-born BM (NBBM), African-born BM (ABBM), and Caribbean-born BM (CBBM). QoL for all men was assessed using The Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) measure, which includes five domains: physical- (PWB), emotional- (EWB), social-(SWB), and functional-wellbeing (FWB), and a CaP subscale (PCS). A subset of men completed qualitative interviews. Demographic and clinical characteristics were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Black CaP survivors aged 49-85 participated in the study (n = 108), with a subset (n = 31) completing a qualitative interview. Participants were mainly NBBM (72.2%) and treated with radiotherapy (51.9%). The FACT-P scale total mean score (± SD) was 114 ± 24.1 (theoretical range 0-156), with lower scores reported on the SWB, FWB, and EWB domains. The mixed-methods findings approach included meta-inferences derived from integrating the corresponding quantitative and qualitative data, covering all the domains within the FACT-P.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Black CaP survivors experienced significant burdens that impacted their overall HRQoL. The analysis revealed impacts on physical, social, and emotional well-being, with variations among ethnic groups suggesting the need for culturally tailored interventions. EWB was also profoundly impacted by CaP treatment, with universal emotional burdens emphasized across all groups. Healthcare providers must recognize and address these multifaceted needs to promote better outcomes and HRQoL for Black CaP survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":"2705-2719"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03718-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among ethnically diverse Black men (BM) with prostate cancer (CaP) in the United States.

Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design, employing both qualitative and quantitative research, involved recruiting Black CaP survivors through multiple channels. The target population was native-born BM (NBBM), African-born BM (ABBM), and Caribbean-born BM (CBBM). QoL for all men was assessed using The Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) measure, which includes five domains: physical- (PWB), emotional- (EWB), social-(SWB), and functional-wellbeing (FWB), and a CaP subscale (PCS). A subset of men completed qualitative interviews. Demographic and clinical characteristics were also collected.

Results: Black CaP survivors aged 49-85 participated in the study (n = 108), with a subset (n = 31) completing a qualitative interview. Participants were mainly NBBM (72.2%) and treated with radiotherapy (51.9%). The FACT-P scale total mean score (± SD) was 114 ± 24.1 (theoretical range 0-156), with lower scores reported on the SWB, FWB, and EWB domains. The mixed-methods findings approach included meta-inferences derived from integrating the corresponding quantitative and qualitative data, covering all the domains within the FACT-P.

Conclusion: Black CaP survivors experienced significant burdens that impacted their overall HRQoL. The analysis revealed impacts on physical, social, and emotional well-being, with variations among ethnic groups suggesting the need for culturally tailored interventions. EWB was also profoundly impacted by CaP treatment, with universal emotional burdens emphasized across all groups. Healthcare providers must recognize and address these multifaceted needs to promote better outcomes and HRQoL for Black CaP survivors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同种族黑人前列腺癌幸存者与健康相关的生活质量:一种会聚平行混合方法。
目的:本研究调查了美国不同种族的前列腺癌(CaP)黑人男性(BM)的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL):方法:采用聚合平行混合方法设计,同时运用定性和定量研究,通过多种渠道招募前列腺癌黑人幸存者。目标人群包括土生土长的黑人(NBBM)、非洲裔黑人(ABBM)和加勒比海裔黑人(CBBM)。所有男性的 QoL 均采用 "癌症治疗功能评估-前列腺"(FACT-P)量表进行评估,该量表包括五个领域:身体健康(PWB)、情绪健康(EWB)、社交健康(SWB)、功能健康(FWB)和 CaP 子量表(PCS)。一部分男性完成了定性访谈。此外,还收集了人口统计学和临床特征:年龄在 49-85 岁之间的黑人 CaP 幸存者参与了研究(n = 108),其中一部分(n = 31)完成了定性访谈。参与者主要是 NBBM(72.2%)和接受过放疗的患者(51.9%)。FACT-P 量表的总平均分(± SD)为 114 ± 24.1(理论范围 0-156),其中 SWB、FWB 和 EWB 领域的得分较低。混合方法的研究结果包括通过整合相应的定量和定性数据得出的元推论,涵盖了 FACT-P 的所有领域:黑人 CaP 幸存者经历了影响其整体 HRQoL 的重大负担。分析表明,他们的身体、社会和情感健康都受到了影响,不同种族群体之间存在差异,这表明有必要采取针对不同文化的干预措施。EWB也受到CaP治疗的深刻影响,所有群体都强调了普遍的情感负担。医疗服务提供者必须认识到并解决这些多方面的需求,以促进黑人 CaP 幸存者获得更好的治疗效果和 HRQoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Demonstrating responsiveness of the pediatric cardiac quality of life inventory in children and adolescents undergoing arrhythmia ablation, heart transplantation, and valve surgery. Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures assessing recovery from hand fractures: a systematic review. Assessing the reliability of a novel cancer-specific multi-attribute utility instrument (FACT-8D) and comparing its validity to EQ-5D-5L in colorectal cancer patients. Health-related quality of life and caregiver burden of pediatric patients with inborn errors of metabolism in Japan using EQ-5D-Y, PedsQL, and J-ZBI. The SMILE scale: a wellness behavioral tool for patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1