Evaluation of the first 5 years of the Next Generation GP leadership programme: balancing autonomy and accountability.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1136/leader-2024-000985
Steve Gulati, Judith A Smith
{"title":"Evaluation of the first 5 years of the Next Generation GP leadership programme: balancing autonomy and accountability.","authors":"Steve Gulati, Judith A Smith","doi":"10.1136/leader-2024-000985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2017, a group of trainee general practitioners (GPs) came together to design and deliver a six-session leadership development programme for their peer trainee and early career GPs: the Next Generation GP programme. Over 2500 GPs took part in Next Generation GP between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the origins and development of the Next Generation GP programme, its early impact on individuals and general practice, and what it reveals about GPs' needs for career and leadership development at a time of major workforce and demand pressures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid review of evidence on general practice workforce and career trends informed the design of qualitative research interviews (n=28) with a purposive sample of programme participants, primary care leaders and educational experts. This was supplemented by analysis of secondary data from participant evaluations of programme workshops.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Many programme participants reported: improved competence in leadership skills, increased understanding of the health system, having new support networks and more energy for their GP role. Respondents pointed out the strengths of the programme, also highlighting ways in which it could be adapted to enable a transition to a more sustainable position within broader clinical and leadership career development.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Next Generation GP has to date largely fulfilled its programme objectives. It now needs more tangible, longer-term objectives against which to assess outcomes. This evaluation has contributed to evidence about primary care leadership needing more policy attention, for the balance of autonomy and accountability within GP leadership needs careful and sustained support.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-000985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2017, a group of trainee general practitioners (GPs) came together to design and deliver a six-session leadership development programme for their peer trainee and early career GPs: the Next Generation GP programme. Over 2500 GPs took part in Next Generation GP between 2017 and 2022.

Aim: To evaluate the origins and development of the Next Generation GP programme, its early impact on individuals and general practice, and what it reveals about GPs' needs for career and leadership development at a time of major workforce and demand pressures.

Methods: A rapid review of evidence on general practice workforce and career trends informed the design of qualitative research interviews (n=28) with a purposive sample of programme participants, primary care leaders and educational experts. This was supplemented by analysis of secondary data from participant evaluations of programme workshops.

Results: Many programme participants reported: improved competence in leadership skills, increased understanding of the health system, having new support networks and more energy for their GP role. Respondents pointed out the strengths of the programme, also highlighting ways in which it could be adapted to enable a transition to a more sustainable position within broader clinical and leadership career development.

Conclusions: Next Generation GP has to date largely fulfilled its programme objectives. It now needs more tangible, longer-term objectives against which to assess outcomes. This evaluation has contributed to evidence about primary care leadership needing more policy attention, for the balance of autonomy and accountability within GP leadership needs careful and sustained support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新一代全科医生领导计划头五年的评估:平衡自主与问责。
背景:2017年,一群见习全科医生(GPs)聚集在一起,为他们的同龄见习全科医生和早期职业全科医生设计并实施了一项为期六节课的领导力发展计划:"下一代全科医生 "计划。目标:评估 "下一代全科医生 "计划的起源和发展、其对个人和全科实践的早期影响,以及在面临重大劳动力和需求压力的情况下,该计划对全科医生职业和领导力发展需求的启示:方法:对有关全科医生队伍和职业趋势的证据进行了快速审查,并据此设计了定性研究访谈(n=28),访谈对象包括计划参与者、初级保健领导者和教育专家。此外,还对计划研讨会参与者评估的二手数据进行了分析:结果:许多计划参与者表示:提高了领导技能,增加了对医疗系统的了解,拥有了新的支持网络,更有精力扮演全科医生的角色。受访者指出了该计划的优势,同时也强调了可以对其进行调整的方式,以便在更广泛的临床和领导职业发展中过渡到更可持续的位置:到目前为止,"下一代全科医生 "计划在很大程度上实现了其目标。现在,它需要更具体、更长期的目标来评估成果。这项评估为需要更多政策关注的初级医疗领导力提供了证据,因为全科医生领导层内部的自主权与问责制之间的平衡需要谨慎而持续的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Religious identity-based discrimination in the physician workforce: findings from a survey of Muslim physicians in the UK. Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS. Gender disparity in Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding within neurology. Impact of department chair gender on paid parental leave across American anaesthesiology residencies. 'Can you have it all?' Exploring perceived gender roles in leadership through the lens of the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer's clinical fellows 2023/24.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1