Beliefs about mental health treatment, treatment initiation, and suicidal behaviors among veterans and service members at-risk for suicide and not in treatment.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13113
Nicole A Short, Nicholas P Allan, Lisham Ashrafioun, Tracy Stecker
{"title":"Beliefs about mental health treatment, treatment initiation, and suicidal behaviors among veterans and service members at-risk for suicide and not in treatment.","authors":"Nicole A Short, Nicholas P Allan, Lisham Ashrafioun, Tracy Stecker","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous research has identified a variety of barriers to mental health care among military personnel and veterans, despite high rates of mental health symptoms. The current study is the first to examine beliefs about mental health treatment barriers among post-9/11 military personnel and veterans at elevated suicide risk not involved in treatment and whether these beliefs are associated with treatment initiation, engagement, or suicidal behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-two participants reported on beliefs about treatment during a cognitive behavioral treatment session and responded to follow-up questionnaires on mental health treatment initiation, engagement, and suicidal behaviors over 12 months. Beliefs identified in the therapy session were coded thematically, and rates of treatment initiation, engagement, and suicidal behavior were examined by belief category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine belief themes emerged. Participants reporting logistical barriers and preferences about treatment type were least likely to initiate mental health treatment and participated in the fewest number of sessions, respectively. Participants endorsing beliefs about stigma or using other ways to cope were most likely to engage in suicidal behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current findings point to specific beliefs that may identify individuals who would benefit from systemic and individual interventions for mental health treatment engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous research has identified a variety of barriers to mental health care among military personnel and veterans, despite high rates of mental health symptoms. The current study is the first to examine beliefs about mental health treatment barriers among post-9/11 military personnel and veterans at elevated suicide risk not involved in treatment and whether these beliefs are associated with treatment initiation, engagement, or suicidal behaviors.

Methods: Four hundred and twenty-two participants reported on beliefs about treatment during a cognitive behavioral treatment session and responded to follow-up questionnaires on mental health treatment initiation, engagement, and suicidal behaviors over 12 months. Beliefs identified in the therapy session were coded thematically, and rates of treatment initiation, engagement, and suicidal behavior were examined by belief category.

Results: Nine belief themes emerged. Participants reporting logistical barriers and preferences about treatment type were least likely to initiate mental health treatment and participated in the fewest number of sessions, respectively. Participants endorsing beliefs about stigma or using other ways to cope were most likely to engage in suicidal behavior.

Conclusions: The current findings point to specific beliefs that may identify individuals who would benefit from systemic and individual interventions for mental health treatment engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有自杀风险但未接受治疗的退伍军人和现役军人对心理健康治疗、开始治疗和自杀行为的看法。
导言:以往的研究发现,尽管军人和退伍军人的心理健康症状发生率很高,但他们在接受心理健康治疗时仍存在各种障碍。本研究首次考察了 9/11 事件后未参与治疗的自杀风险较高的军人和退伍军人对心理健康治疗障碍的看法,以及这些看法是否与治疗的开始、参与或自杀行为有关:方法: 422 名参与者在认知行为治疗过程中报告了他们的治疗信念,并在 12 个月内对心理健康治疗的启动、参与和自杀行为进行了后续问卷调查。我们对治疗过程中发现的信念进行了主题编码,并按信念类别对开始治疗、参与治疗和自杀行为的比率进行了研究:结果:出现了九个信念主题。报告后勤障碍和偏好治疗类型的参与者最不可能开始心理健康治疗,参与治疗的次数也最少。认同耻辱感或使用其他方式应对的参与者最有可能做出自杀行为:目前的研究结果指出了一些特定的信念,这些信念可以识别出哪些人可以从心理健康治疗的系统干预和个人干预中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Predictors and patterns of suicidal ideation disclosures among American adults. Suicide decision-making: Differences in proximal considerations between individuals who aborted and attempted suicide. Nonresponse to an item assessing firearm ownership: Associations with suicide risk and emotional distress. Threat perceptions, defensive behaviors, and the perceived suicide prevention value of specific firearm storage practices. Participation in a daily diary study about suicide ideation yields no iatrogenic effects: A mixed method analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1