Validation of the Chinese version of the 'caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)' in family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer: A study protocol.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.2227
Dongmei Zhuang, Yan Wang, Qin Chen, Ting Wang, Peng Zhou, Furong Zhu, Shaohua Hu
{"title":"Validation of the Chinese version of the 'caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)' in family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer: A study protocol.","authors":"Dongmei Zhuang, Yan Wang, Qin Chen, Ting Wang, Peng Zhou, Furong Zhu, Shaohua Hu","doi":"10.1002/nop2.2227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to translate the English version of the 'caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)' into Chinese and validate its psychometric properties in the family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A methodological study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the Brislin translation model, the original scale will be translated and back-translated, the Delphi expert consultation method will be adopted for cross-cultural adaptation, and the pilot will be carried out in 20-30 family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer. Then, a dual-centre prospective study will be conducted by recruiting 371-542 family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer to validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CAFCPCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale's content validity will be evaluated using the Delphi expert inquiry method, and the face validity will be evaluated using a pre-experiment. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) will be used to assess structural validity, while internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability will be used to assess reliability.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Public involvement is of great significance for this study. Participants will be used in a pre-test to give feedback on whether the contents of the clinical pilot version of CAFCPCS after expert consultation can reflect real problems and whether the sentences can be well understood. Based on their opinions, the research group will further refine the scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to translate the English version of the 'caring ability of family caregivers of patients with cancer scale (CAFCPCS)' into Chinese and validate its psychometric properties in the family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer.

Design: A methodological study.

Methods: Based on the Brislin translation model, the original scale will be translated and back-translated, the Delphi expert consultation method will be adopted for cross-cultural adaptation, and the pilot will be carried out in 20-30 family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer. Then, a dual-centre prospective study will be conducted by recruiting 371-542 family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer to validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CAFCPCS.

Results: The scale's content validity will be evaluated using the Delphi expert inquiry method, and the face validity will be evaluated using a pre-experiment. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) will be used to assess structural validity, while internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability will be used to assess reliability.

Patient or public contribution: Public involvement is of great significance for this study. Participants will be used in a pre-test to give feedback on whether the contents of the clinical pilot version of CAFCPCS after expert consultation can reflect real problems and whether the sentences can be well understood. Based on their opinions, the research group will further refine the scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在老年癌症患者家庭照护者中验证中文版 "癌症患者家庭照护者照护能力量表(CAFCPCS)":研究方案。
目的:本研究旨在将英文版 "癌症患者家庭照顾者关怀能力量表(CAFCPCS)"翻译成中文,并在老年癌症患者家庭照顾者中验证其心理测量学特性:方法:方法学研究:方法:根据布里斯林翻译模式,将原量表进行翻译和回译,采用德尔菲专家咨询法进行跨文化调适,并在 20-30 名老年癌症患者的家庭照顾者中进行试点。然后,将招募 371-542 名老年癌症患者的家庭照顾者进行双中心前瞻性研究,以验证 CAFCPCS 中文版的心理测量学特性:结果:量表的内容效度将采用德尔菲专家调查法进行评估,表面效度将采用预实验法进行评估。探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)将用于评估结构效度,而内部一致性信度和分半信度将用于评估信度:公众参与对本研究具有重要意义。患者或公众的贡献:公众的参与对本研究具有重要意义。我们将通过预试验,让参与者就专家咨询后的 CAFCPCS 临床试用版的内容是否能反映实际问题、句子是否能被很好地理解等问题提出反馈意见。根据他们的意见,研究小组将进一步完善量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
The mediating role of psychological resilience in the effect of strength of religious faith on coping with stress in people with type 2 diabetes: A SEM analysis Nurse experiences and perspectives with missed nursing care during COVID‐19: A qualitative study A comparison of work characteristics and health status between Korean and US hospital nurses Practicing nurses' and nursing students' perceptions of climate change: A scoping review Health literacy and diabetes information preferences among Chinese immigrants: An Australian cross‐sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1