Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development Third Edition Among Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1080/01942638.2024.2378050
Laine Roczniak, Mylène Jutras, Caroline Lévesque, Carole Fortin
{"title":"Reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development Third Edition Among Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.","authors":"Laine Roczniak, Mylène Jutras, Caroline Lévesque, Carole Fortin","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2024.2378050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Test of Gross Motor Development Third Edition (TGMD-3) is used to assess the development of fundamental movement skills in children from 3 to 10 years old. This study aimed to evaluate the intra-rater, inter-rater, and test-retest reliability and to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC) value of the TGMD-3 in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TGMD-3 was administered to 20 children with DCD. The child's fundamental movement skills were recorded using a digital video camera. Reliability was assessed at two occasions by three raters using the generalizability theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TGMD-3 demonstrates good inter-rater reliability for the locomotor skills subscale, the ball skills subscale, and the total score (φ = 0.77 - 0.91), while the intra-rater reliability was even higher (φ = 0.94 - 0.97). Test-retest reliability was also shown to be good (φ = 0.79-0.93). The MDC<sub>95</sub> was determined to be 10 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that the TGMD-3 is a reliable test when used to evaluate fundamental movement skills in children with DCD and suggests that an increase of 10 points represents a significant change in the motor function of a child with DCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2024.2378050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The Test of Gross Motor Development Third Edition (TGMD-3) is used to assess the development of fundamental movement skills in children from 3 to 10 years old. This study aimed to evaluate the intra-rater, inter-rater, and test-retest reliability and to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC) value of the TGMD-3 in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD).

Methods: The TGMD-3 was administered to 20 children with DCD. The child's fundamental movement skills were recorded using a digital video camera. Reliability was assessed at two occasions by three raters using the generalizability theory.

Results: The TGMD-3 demonstrates good inter-rater reliability for the locomotor skills subscale, the ball skills subscale, and the total score (φ = 0.77 - 0.91), while the intra-rater reliability was even higher (φ = 0.94 - 0.97). Test-retest reliability was also shown to be good (φ = 0.79-0.93). The MDC95 was determined to be 10 points.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the TGMD-3 is a reliable test when used to evaluate fundamental movement skills in children with DCD and suggests that an increase of 10 points represents a significant change in the motor function of a child with DCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发育协调障碍儿童粗大运动发育测试第三版的可靠性。
目的:粗大运动发展测试第三版(TGMD-3)用于评估3至10岁儿童基本运动技能的发展。本研究旨在评估TGMD-3在患有发育协调障碍(DCD)的儿童中的评定者内部、评定者之间和重复测试的可靠性,并确定最小可检测变化(MDC)值:方法:对 20 名发育协调障碍儿童进行 TGMD-3 测试。方法:对 20 名发育协调障碍儿童进行 TGMD-3 测试,并使用数码摄像机记录儿童的基本动作技能。结果:TGMD-3表现出良好的可靠性:TGMD-3的运动技能分量表、球类技能分量表和总分的评分者间信度良好(φ = 0.77 - 0.91),评分者内部信度更高(φ = 0.94 - 0.97)。测试-重测信度也显示良好(φ = 0.79-0.93)。MDC95 被确定为 10 分:本研究提供的证据表明,TGMD-3 是用于评估 DCD 儿童基本运动技能的可靠测试,并表明 10 分的增加代表着 DCD 儿童运动功能的显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Translation Interventions to Increase the Uptake of Evidence-Based Practice Among Pediatric Rehabilitation Professionals: A Systematic Review. Letter to the Editor. Development and Validation of the Participation Questionnaire for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Structural Validity, Internal Consistency, and Construct Validity. Home Participation of Infants With and Without Biological Risk in the First Year of Life: A Cross-Sectional and Comparative Study. Telehealth of Infants at Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Physical Therapists' and Caregiver's Perceptions and Costs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1