Clinical evaluation of a one-piece polyetheretherketone removable partial denture fabricated using a novel digital workflow: A self-controlled clinical trial

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/jopr.13907
Jung-min Yoon DDS, Yunsong Liu DDS, PhD, Yuchun Sun DDS, PhD, Hongqiang Ye DDS, PhD, Yongsheng Zhou DDS, PhD
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of a one-piece polyetheretherketone removable partial denture fabricated using a novel digital workflow: A self-controlled clinical trial","authors":"Jung-min Yoon DDS,&nbsp;Yunsong Liu DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Yuchun Sun DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Hongqiang Ye DDS, PhD,&nbsp;Yongsheng Zhou DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the clinical application of one-piece polyetheretherketone (PEEK) removable partial dentures (RPDs) fabricated using a novel digital workflow and to evaluate their weights and fits in vivo and patient satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen cases with posterior partially edentulous situations were selected, and each patient received two types of RPDs, including a novel digital workflow (test group) and a conventional workflow (control group). For the test group, one-piece RPDs were designed through three-dimensional (3D) methods by scanning stone casts and fabricated by milling PEEK discs. Each RPD was weighed. The gaps between the oral tissue and RPDs in each group were duplicated using a polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) replica and measured by 3D analysis. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the patient's satisfaction. Paired <i>t</i>-tests were used to compare the differences in the weight, the gaps of each RPD, and VAS values between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance tests was used to compare the differences in the gap among different components in each group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The RPD in the test group weighed less than that in the control group (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.01). No statistically significant differences in the gaps of denture bases and rests (<i>p </i>&gt; 0.05) were found between the two groups, but the gaps of major connectors in the test group were significantly smaller than in the control group (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.05). The VAS scores for comfortableness and masticatory efficiency were not significantly different between the two groups (<i>p </i>&gt; 0.05) but the scores for the aesthetic appearance of the clasps in the test group were significantly higher than that in the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>One-piece PEEK RPDs manufactured using a novel digital workflow weighed less than conventional RPDs and exhibited a clinically acceptable internal fit. Although the aesthetic appearance of the PEEK clasps was superior to the control, there is still room for improvement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopr.13907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the clinical application of one-piece polyetheretherketone (PEEK) removable partial dentures (RPDs) fabricated using a novel digital workflow and to evaluate their weights and fits in vivo and patient satisfaction.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen cases with posterior partially edentulous situations were selected, and each patient received two types of RPDs, including a novel digital workflow (test group) and a conventional workflow (control group). For the test group, one-piece RPDs were designed through three-dimensional (3D) methods by scanning stone casts and fabricated by milling PEEK discs. Each RPD was weighed. The gaps between the oral tissue and RPDs in each group were duplicated using a polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) replica and measured by 3D analysis. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the patient's satisfaction. Paired t-tests were used to compare the differences in the weight, the gaps of each RPD, and VAS values between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance tests was used to compare the differences in the gap among different components in each group.

Results

The RPD in the test group weighed less than that in the control group (< 0.01). No statistically significant differences in the gaps of denture bases and rests (> 0.05) were found between the two groups, but the gaps of major connectors in the test group were significantly smaller than in the control group (< 0.05). The VAS scores for comfortableness and masticatory efficiency were not significantly different between the two groups (> 0.05) but the scores for the aesthetic appearance of the clasps in the test group were significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

One-piece PEEK RPDs manufactured using a novel digital workflow weighed less than conventional RPDs and exhibited a clinically acceptable internal fit. Although the aesthetic appearance of the PEEK clasps was superior to the control, there is still room for improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型数字化工作流程制作的一体式聚醚醚酮可摘局部义齿的临床评估:自控临床试验。
目的:探讨使用新型数字化工作流程制作的一体式聚醚醚酮(PEEK)可摘局部义齿(RPD)的临床应用,并评估其在体内的重量和密合度以及患者的满意度:选取了15例后牙部分缺失的患者,每位患者都接受了两种类型的可摘局部义齿,包括新型数字化工作流程(试验组)和传统工作流程(对照组)。在测试组中,通过三维(3D)方法扫描结石铸模设计单件式 RPD,并通过铣削 PEEK 盘制作 RPD。每个 RPD 都经过称重。使用聚乙烯硅氧烷(PVS)复型复制每组的口腔组织和 RPD 之间的间隙,并通过三维分析进行测量。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的满意度。采用配对 t 检验比较两组患者在体重、各 RPD 间隙和 VAS 值方面的差异。单因素方差分析用于比较各组不同组件间间隙的差异:结果:试验组的 RPD 重量小于对照组(P 0.05),但试验组主要连接件的间隙明显小于对照组(P 0.05),但试验组的扣环美观度评分明显高于对照组(P 结论:试验组的 RPD 重量小于对照组(P 0.05),但试验组主要连接件的间隙明显小于对照组(P 0.05),但试验组的扣环美观度评分明显高于对照组(P 0.05):使用新型数字工作流程制造的一体式 PEEK RPD 重量低于传统 RPD,其内部密合度在临床上也是可以接受的。虽然 PEEK 夹钳的外观优于对照组,但仍有改进的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
期刊最新文献
Effect of magnetic resonance imaging protocol on decision-making for positioning of dental implants in edentulous cases. Utilization of digitally milled verification jigs for recording jaw relations in complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A digital clinical report. Influence of the post-processing protocol on a biocompatible 3D-printed resin. Intraoral scanning for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses (ISCFDPs): Four clinical reports. Accuracy of intraoral versus desktop scanners used in digitizing polyvinyl siloxane impression for fabricating a CAD-CAM customized post and core.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1