Factors associated with Saudi physicians' utilization of clinical ethics consultation services.

Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/dewb.12459
Ruaim A Muaygil, Raaoum M Jabor, Rahaf A Alrayes, Ghada S Alharbi, Shaima A Alqoud, Manar A Alenazi, Ftoon A Alenazi, Taim A Muayqil
{"title":"Factors associated with Saudi physicians' utilization of clinical ethics consultation services.","authors":"Ruaim A Muaygil, Raaoum M Jabor, Rahaf A Alrayes, Ghada S Alharbi, Shaima A Alqoud, Manar A Alenazi, Ftoon A Alenazi, Taim A Muayqil","doi":"10.1111/dewb.12459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical Ethics Consultation (CEC) aims to resolve ethical dilemmas at the bedside. Through a structured process, CEC allows practitioners and patients to consult ethicists at times of moral conflict or uncertainty. Over the past few decades, CEC has become an invaluable part of healthcare practice. In Saudi Arabia, however, CEC services remain inexplicably underutilized. This study attempts to understand the factors associated with Saudi physicians' utilization of CEC to better meet the needs of practitioners and patients. Results indicate that although physicians routinely experience moral dilemmas, they seldom request a CEC. This is not due to unfamiliarity, lack of accessibility, or suspicion of ethical expertise. Rather, reluctance is likely due to an ingrained medical cultural stronghold that pressures practitioners to act heroically, and to resolve ethical dilemmas independently. Recommendations to improve the utilization of CEC services include wider availability, active collaborations with clinical practitioners, routine quality improvements, and managerial and national support.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical Ethics Consultation (CEC) aims to resolve ethical dilemmas at the bedside. Through a structured process, CEC allows practitioners and patients to consult ethicists at times of moral conflict or uncertainty. Over the past few decades, CEC has become an invaluable part of healthcare practice. In Saudi Arabia, however, CEC services remain inexplicably underutilized. This study attempts to understand the factors associated with Saudi physicians' utilization of CEC to better meet the needs of practitioners and patients. Results indicate that although physicians routinely experience moral dilemmas, they seldom request a CEC. This is not due to unfamiliarity, lack of accessibility, or suspicion of ethical expertise. Rather, reluctance is likely due to an ingrained medical cultural stronghold that pressures practitioners to act heroically, and to resolve ethical dilemmas independently. Recommendations to improve the utilization of CEC services include wider availability, active collaborations with clinical practitioners, routine quality improvements, and managerial and national support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
沙特医生利用临床伦理咨询服务的相关因素。
临床伦理咨询(CEC)旨在解决床边的伦理难题。通过结构化流程,CEC 允许从业人员和患者在道德冲突或不确定时向伦理学家咨询。在过去的几十年里,CEC 已成为医疗实践中不可或缺的一部分。然而,在沙特阿拉伯,CEC 服务的利用率仍然低得令人费解。本研究试图了解与沙特医生利用 CEC 相关的因素,以更好地满足从业人员和患者的需求。研究结果表明,虽然医生经常会遇到道德困境,但他们很少会请求 CEC。这并不是因为不熟悉、缺乏可及性或对道德专业知识的怀疑。相反,不情愿的原因可能是根深蒂固的医学文化堡垒迫使从业人员逞英雄,独立解决道德困境。提高 CEC 服务利用率的建议包括:更广泛地提供 CEC 服务、与临床从业人员积极合作、例行质量改进以及管理和国家支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1