Effectiveness of the Hypertension Screening Corner in Enhancing the Cascade of Care at Primary Healthcare Center Level: Evidence from Zambezia, Mozambique.
IF 3 3区 医学Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMSGlobal HeartPub Date : 2024-07-10eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI:10.5334/gh.1339
Anna Sartorello, Roberto Benoni, Lucy Ramirez, Aldo Mundjane, Frederic Kalombola, Alfredo Ramos, Edgar Meque, Paolo Massaro, Neusa Jessen, Giovanni Putoto, Albertino Damasceno
{"title":"Effectiveness of the Hypertension Screening Corner in Enhancing the Cascade of Care at Primary Healthcare Center Level: Evidence from Zambezia, Mozambique.","authors":"Anna Sartorello, Roberto Benoni, Lucy Ramirez, Aldo Mundjane, Frederic Kalombola, Alfredo Ramos, Edgar Meque, Paolo Massaro, Neusa Jessen, Giovanni Putoto, Albertino Damasceno","doi":"10.5334/gh.1339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease, whose death burden is dramatically increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. To curb its effects, early diagnosis and effective follow-up are essential. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of a hypertension screening corner on the hypertension care cascade at the primary healthcare level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 in two PHCCs in Zambezia (Mozambique). The study involved a demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) questionnaire for those screened. Patients with blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg were given a follow-up questionnaire regarding the care cascade. The four cascade steps were: medical visit, diagnosis confirmation, follow-up visit, and recalling the follow-up appointment. The odds ratio (OR) of reaching each step of the cascade was assessed by binomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with BP > 140/90 mmHg were 454, and 370 (86.0%) completed both study phases. Individuals attending the medical visit were 225 (60.8%). Those with low SES had a higher probability of visit attendance than those with middle (OR = 0.46, 0.95CI[0.23-0.88] p = 0.020) and high (OR = 0.21 0.95CI[0.10-0.42], p < 0.001). Hypertension diagnosis was confirmed in 181 (80.4%), with higher probability in the low SES group compared to the middle (OR = 0.24 IC95[0.08-0.66], p = 0.007) and high (OR = 0.23, IC95[0.07-0.74], p = 0.016) groups. The OR to complete step 1 and step 2 were higher for older age groups. A follow-up appointment was received and recalled by 166 (91.7%) and 162 (97.6%) patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hypertension corner proved to be a useful tool for effective screening of hypertension with satisfactory retention in care, especially for people with lower socio-economic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"19 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11243761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease, whose death burden is dramatically increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. To curb its effects, early diagnosis and effective follow-up are essential. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the impact of a hypertension screening corner on the hypertension care cascade at the primary healthcare level.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 in two PHCCs in Zambezia (Mozambique). The study involved a demographic and socioeconomic status (SES) questionnaire for those screened. Patients with blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mmHg were given a follow-up questionnaire regarding the care cascade. The four cascade steps were: medical visit, diagnosis confirmation, follow-up visit, and recalling the follow-up appointment. The odds ratio (OR) of reaching each step of the cascade was assessed by binomial logistic regression.
Results: Patients with BP > 140/90 mmHg were 454, and 370 (86.0%) completed both study phases. Individuals attending the medical visit were 225 (60.8%). Those with low SES had a higher probability of visit attendance than those with middle (OR = 0.46, 0.95CI[0.23-0.88] p = 0.020) and high (OR = 0.21 0.95CI[0.10-0.42], p < 0.001). Hypertension diagnosis was confirmed in 181 (80.4%), with higher probability in the low SES group compared to the middle (OR = 0.24 IC95[0.08-0.66], p = 0.007) and high (OR = 0.23, IC95[0.07-0.74], p = 0.016) groups. The OR to complete step 1 and step 2 were higher for older age groups. A follow-up appointment was received and recalled by 166 (91.7%) and 162 (97.6%) patients, respectively.
Conclusions: The hypertension corner proved to be a useful tool for effective screening of hypertension with satisfactory retention in care, especially for people with lower socio-economic status.
Global HeartMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍:
Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources.
Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention.
Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.