Corneal parameters in diabetics versus non-diabetics and correlation with various blood sugar parameters.

Shailaja Pandey, Archana Singh, Harikrishnan Vannadil, Mohini Agrawal
{"title":"Corneal parameters in diabetics versus non-diabetics and correlation with various blood sugar parameters.","authors":"Shailaja Pandey, Archana Singh, Harikrishnan Vannadil, Mohini Agrawal","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2024.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To compare corneal parameters in diabetics versus age-group-matched non-diabetics; also, to correlate these parameters with the duration of diabetes, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and severity levels of diabetic retinopathy (DR). <b>Materials and methods:</b> A comparative study was conducted at a tertiary eye-care center from January 2020 to December 2020. Two-hundred patients (400 eyes) with type-2 diabetes (100) and age-sex-matched non-diabetics (100) were included. Corneal morphological parameters like central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variance (CoV), hexagonality (6A), and average cell area were recorded by specular microscopy. These parameters were correlated with the duration of diabetes, severity of disease based upon fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, and grade of DR. Mean and standard deviation were calculated, and regular distribution of continuous data was tested using independent sample t-test and ANOVA. <b>Results:</b> Mean ECD (2447.32 ± 269.89/mm2), 6A (45.03 ± 6.71%), and IOP (15.47 ± 2.02 mmHg) changed in diabetic cases and were significantly low in diabetics, whereas, mean average cell area (413 ± 50.19 mm2), standard deviation (167.05 ± 77.91), CCT (525.81 ± 36.69) and CoV (39.84 ± 15.59%), were significantly high in diabetics. Mean CCT had insignificant variation. Subgroup analysis within diabetics showed a statistically significant reduction of ECD, cell count, and 6A with increased duration of diabetes, poor glycaemic control, and raised HbA1c. <b>Discussion:</b> The corneal endothelial analysis is vital in daily clinical practice and provides valuable evidence concerning the viability of corneal endothelium in various intraocular surgeries. Uncontrolled DM harms the cornea with 70% of diabetics resulting in complications like keratopathy. The study highlighted that the increased duration of diabetes raised HbA1c, and poor glycemic control negatively affected corneal morphology. Our study showed a definite reduction in ECD and 6A in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. <b>Conclusion:</b> A definite reduction in the corneal endothelial counts, cell density, and hexagonality was found in type-2 diabetics compared to non-diabetics. <b>Abbreviations:</b> DM = Diabetes Mellitus, CCT = central corneal thickness, ECC = endothelial cell counts, ECD = endothelial cell density, CoV = coefficient of variance, 6A = hexagonality, DR = Diabetic retinopathy, SD = Standard of deviation, IOP = Intraocular pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"68 2","pages":"128-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2024.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare corneal parameters in diabetics versus age-group-matched non-diabetics; also, to correlate these parameters with the duration of diabetes, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and severity levels of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Materials and methods: A comparative study was conducted at a tertiary eye-care center from January 2020 to December 2020. Two-hundred patients (400 eyes) with type-2 diabetes (100) and age-sex-matched non-diabetics (100) were included. Corneal morphological parameters like central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variance (CoV), hexagonality (6A), and average cell area were recorded by specular microscopy. These parameters were correlated with the duration of diabetes, severity of disease based upon fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, and grade of DR. Mean and standard deviation were calculated, and regular distribution of continuous data was tested using independent sample t-test and ANOVA. Results: Mean ECD (2447.32 ± 269.89/mm2), 6A (45.03 ± 6.71%), and IOP (15.47 ± 2.02 mmHg) changed in diabetic cases and were significantly low in diabetics, whereas, mean average cell area (413 ± 50.19 mm2), standard deviation (167.05 ± 77.91), CCT (525.81 ± 36.69) and CoV (39.84 ± 15.59%), were significantly high in diabetics. Mean CCT had insignificant variation. Subgroup analysis within diabetics showed a statistically significant reduction of ECD, cell count, and 6A with increased duration of diabetes, poor glycaemic control, and raised HbA1c. Discussion: The corneal endothelial analysis is vital in daily clinical practice and provides valuable evidence concerning the viability of corneal endothelium in various intraocular surgeries. Uncontrolled DM harms the cornea with 70% of diabetics resulting in complications like keratopathy. The study highlighted that the increased duration of diabetes raised HbA1c, and poor glycemic control negatively affected corneal morphology. Our study showed a definite reduction in ECD and 6A in diabetics compared to non-diabetics. Conclusion: A definite reduction in the corneal endothelial counts, cell density, and hexagonality was found in type-2 diabetics compared to non-diabetics. Abbreviations: DM = Diabetes Mellitus, CCT = central corneal thickness, ECC = endothelial cell counts, ECD = endothelial cell density, CoV = coefficient of variance, 6A = hexagonality, DR = Diabetic retinopathy, SD = Standard of deviation, IOP = Intraocular pressure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的角膜参数以及与各种血糖参数的相关性。
目的:比较糖尿病患者与年龄组匹配的非糖尿病患者的角膜参数,并将这些参数与糖尿病持续时间、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平和糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的严重程度相关联。材料和方法:一项比较研究于 2020 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在一家三级眼科中心进行。研究对象包括 200 名 2 型糖尿病患者(400 眼)(100 人)和年龄性别匹配的非糖尿病患者(100 人)。通过镜面显微镜记录了角膜形态参数,如角膜中央厚度(CCT)、内皮细胞密度(ECD)、方差系数(CoV)、六边形(6A)和平均细胞面积。这些参数与糖尿病病程、基于空腹血糖水平的疾病严重程度、HbA1c 和 DR 分级相关。计算平均值和标准差,并使用独立样本 t 检验和方差分析检验连续数据的正态分布。结果糖尿病病例的平均 ECD(2447.32 ± 269.89/mm2)、6A(45.03 ± 6.71%)和眼压(15.47 ± 2.02 mmHg)发生了变化,糖尿病患者明显偏低,而平均细胞面积(413 ± 50.19 mm2)、标准差(167.05 ± 77.91)、CCT(525.81 ± 36.69)和 CoV(39.84 ± 15.59%)则明显偏高。平均 CCT 变化不大。对糖尿病患者进行的亚组分析表明,随着糖尿病病程的延长、血糖控制不佳和 HbA1c 的升高,ECD、细胞计数和 6A 均有统计学意义上的显著降低。讨论:角膜内皮分析在日常临床实践中至关重要,它为各种眼内手术中角膜内皮的活力提供了宝贵的证据。不受控制的糖尿病会损害角膜,70% 的糖尿病患者会导致角膜病变等并发症。研究强调,糖尿病病程延长会提高 HbA1c,血糖控制不佳会对角膜形态产生负面影响。我们的研究显示,与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的 ECD 和 6A 明显减少。结论:与非糖尿病患者相比,2 型糖尿病患者的角膜内皮细胞数量、细胞密度和六角形度均明显减少。缩写:DM=糖尿病,CCT=角膜中央厚度,ECC=内皮细胞计数,ECD=内皮细胞密度,CoV=方差系数,6A=六方性,DR=糖尿病视网膜病变,SD=标准偏差,IOP=眼压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optical Density and Polarized Light Microscopy to confirm calcification of Intra-ocular Lens. Progression of corneal thinning and melting after collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Protecting vision with intraoperative visual evoked potentials and tractography in transcortical brain tumor surgery. A Brief Review on Adult-Onset Coats' Disease. A neural network model for predicting the effectiveness of treatment in patients with neovascular glaucoma associated with diabetes mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1