Morbidity and Mortality of Hospital-Onset SARS-CoV-2 Infections Due to Omicron Versus Prior Variants : A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.7326/M24-0199
Michael Klompas, Caroline S McKenna, Sanjat Kanjilal, Theodore Pak, Chanu Rhee, Tom Chen
{"title":"Morbidity and Mortality of Hospital-Onset SARS-CoV-2 Infections Due to Omicron Versus Prior Variants : A Propensity-Matched Analysis.","authors":"Michael Klompas, Caroline S McKenna, Sanjat Kanjilal, Theodore Pak, Chanu Rhee, Tom Chen","doi":"10.7326/M24-0199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many hospitals have scaled back measures to prevent nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection given large decreases in the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infections for most people. Little is known, however, about the morbidity and mortality of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections for hospitalized patients in the Omicron era.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the effect of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection on hospitalized patients' outcomes during the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>5 acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, December 2020 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 on or after hospital day 5, after negative SARS-CoV-2 test results on admission and on hospital day 3, were matched to control participants by hospital, service, time period, days since admission, and propensity scores that incorporated demographics, comorbid conditions, vaccination status, primary diagnosis category, vital signs, and laboratory test values.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Primary outcomes were hospital mortality and time to discharge. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for advanced oxygen support, discharge destination, hospital-free days, and 30-day readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 274 cases of hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pre-Omicron period and 1037 cases during the Omicron period (0.17 vs. 0.49 cases per 100 admissions). Patients with hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection were older and had more comorbid conditions than those without. During the pre-Omicron period, hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with increased risk for ICU admission, increased need for high-flow oxygen, longer time to discharge (median difference, 4.7 days [95% CI, 2.9 to 6.6 days]), and higher mortality (risk ratio, 2.0 [CI, 1.1 to 3.8]) versus matched control participants. During the Omicron period, hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection remained associated with increased risk for ICU admission and increased time to discharge (median difference, 4.2 days [CI, 3.6 to 5.0 days]). The association with increased hospital mortality was attenuated but still significant (risk ratio, 1.6 [CI, 1.2 to 2.3]).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Residual confounding may be present.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron period remains associated with increased morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>Harvard Medical School Department of Population Medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/M24-0199","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many hospitals have scaled back measures to prevent nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection given large decreases in the morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infections for most people. Little is known, however, about the morbidity and mortality of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections for hospitalized patients in the Omicron era.

Objective: To estimate the effect of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection on hospitalized patients' outcomes during the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods.

Design: Retrospective matched cohort study.

Setting: 5 acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, December 2020 to April 2023.

Patients: Adults testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 on or after hospital day 5, after negative SARS-CoV-2 test results on admission and on hospital day 3, were matched to control participants by hospital, service, time period, days since admission, and propensity scores that incorporated demographics, comorbid conditions, vaccination status, primary diagnosis category, vital signs, and laboratory test values.

Measurements: Primary outcomes were hospital mortality and time to discharge. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for advanced oxygen support, discharge destination, hospital-free days, and 30-day readmissions.

Results: There were 274 cases of hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection during the pre-Omicron period and 1037 cases during the Omicron period (0.17 vs. 0.49 cases per 100 admissions). Patients with hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection were older and had more comorbid conditions than those without. During the pre-Omicron period, hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with increased risk for ICU admission, increased need for high-flow oxygen, longer time to discharge (median difference, 4.7 days [95% CI, 2.9 to 6.6 days]), and higher mortality (risk ratio, 2.0 [CI, 1.1 to 3.8]) versus matched control participants. During the Omicron period, hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection remained associated with increased risk for ICU admission and increased time to discharge (median difference, 4.2 days [CI, 3.6 to 5.0 days]). The association with increased hospital mortality was attenuated but still significant (risk ratio, 1.6 [CI, 1.2 to 2.3]).

Limitation: Residual confounding may be present.

Conclusion: Hospital-onset SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron period remains associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Primary funding source: Harvard Medical School Department of Population Medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由 Omicron 和先前变体引起的医院感染 SARS-CoV-2 的发病率和死亡率 :倾向匹配分析
背景:鉴于大多数人感染 SARS-CoV-2 的发病率和死亡率大幅下降,许多医院已经缩减了预防 SARS-CoV-2 病菌感染的措施。然而,人们对 Omicron 时代住院病人感染 SARS-CoV-2 的发病率和死亡率知之甚少:估计在前 Omicron 和 Omicron 时代,SARS-CoV-2 对住院病人的影响:设计:回顾性匹配队列研究:2020年12月至2023年4月,马萨诸塞州5家急症护理医院:在入院时和住院第 3 天 SARS-CoV-2 检测结果为阴性后,在住院第 5 天或之后 SARS-CoV-2 检测结果呈阳性的成人与对照组参与者通过医院、服务、时间段、入院后天数以及包含人口统计学、合并症、疫苗接种情况、主要诊断类别、生命体征和实验室检测值的倾向评分进行匹配:主要结果为住院死亡率和出院时间。次要结果是入住重症监护室(ICU)、需要高级氧气支持、出院目的地、无住院天数和 30 天再入院率:结果:在前 Omicron 阶段,医院有 274 例 SARS-CoV-2 感染病例,而在 Omicron 阶段则有 1037 例(每 100 例住院病例中分别有 0.17 例和 0.49 例)。与未感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者相比,感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者年龄更大,合并症更多。与匹配的对照组相比,在欧姆克隆前期,感染 SARS-CoV-2 的住院患者入住重症监护病房的风险增加,需要高流量供氧的情况增多,出院时间延长(中位数差异为 4.7 天 [95% CI, 2.9 至 6.6 天]),死亡率升高(风险比为 2.0 [CI, 1.1 至 3.8])。在 Omicron 期间,医院感染 SARS-CoV-2 仍与入住 ICU 的风险增加和出院时间延长有关(中位数差异为 4.2 天 [CI, 3.6 至 5.0 天])。与住院死亡率增加的相关性有所减弱,但仍然显著(风险比为 1.6 [CI,1.2 至 2.3]):局限性:可能存在残余混杂因素:主要资金来源:哈佛大学医学院人口系:哈佛医学院人口医学系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Hormonal Treatments and Vaginal Moisturizers for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : A Systematic Review. Hormonal Treatments and Vaginal Moisturizers for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause. Association Between Hospital Type and Resilience During COVID-19 Caseload Stress : A Retrospective Cohort Study. Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : An Evidence Map. Guidelines Recommending That Clinicians Advise Patients on Lifestyle Changes: A Popular but Questionable Approach to Improve Public Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1