Effect of hemolysis on D-dimer testing measured with the Improgen kit: is all manufacturer information correct?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001316
Merve Sena Odabasi
{"title":"Effect of hemolysis on D-dimer testing measured with the Improgen kit: is all manufacturer information correct?","authors":"Merve Sena Odabasi","doi":"10.1097/MBC.0000000000001316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product and its measurement is affected by hemolysis. This study was designed to reveal the value of hemolysis affecting D-dimer in our laboratory. In this study, hemolysate samples obtained by both mechanical and freezing methods were used. D-dimer levels of all plasmas were measured with Improgen Diagnostic kit by immune-turbidimetric method. Numerical change in hemolyzed samples was evaluated by calculating the percentage difference, and clinically significant differences were evaluated by calculating the maximum acceptable bias (MAB). In the hemolysate study prepared by both freeze-thaw and mechanical methods, it was observed that low D-dimer levels did not exceed the total allowable error (TAE) (30%) up to +2 hemolysis (corresponds to hemoglobin = 1.01-2 g/l) and did not exceed the MAB (65%) even at +4 hemolysis (corresponds to hemoglobin = 1.01-2 g/l). High D-dimer levels did not exceed the limit values of both TAE (30%) and MAB (68%) even in +4 hemolysis. The D-dimer test was affected by lower levels of hemolysis compared to both other studies and the values in the kit insert (hemoglobin >5 g/l corresponds to +4 hemolysis index). We verified the hemolysis interference in the D-dimer test, which we thought was not compatible with the kit insert, under our own laboratory conditions. This is the first hemolysis interference study performed with the Improgen brand d-dimer kit. In samples with a hemolysis rate of +2 and above, it would be more accurate to reject the D-dimer result as a 'hemolyzed sample'.</p>","PeriodicalId":8992,"journal":{"name":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000001316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product and its measurement is affected by hemolysis. This study was designed to reveal the value of hemolysis affecting D-dimer in our laboratory. In this study, hemolysate samples obtained by both mechanical and freezing methods were used. D-dimer levels of all plasmas were measured with Improgen Diagnostic kit by immune-turbidimetric method. Numerical change in hemolyzed samples was evaluated by calculating the percentage difference, and clinically significant differences were evaluated by calculating the maximum acceptable bias (MAB). In the hemolysate study prepared by both freeze-thaw and mechanical methods, it was observed that low D-dimer levels did not exceed the total allowable error (TAE) (30%) up to +2 hemolysis (corresponds to hemoglobin = 1.01-2 g/l) and did not exceed the MAB (65%) even at +4 hemolysis (corresponds to hemoglobin = 1.01-2 g/l). High D-dimer levels did not exceed the limit values of both TAE (30%) and MAB (68%) even in +4 hemolysis. The D-dimer test was affected by lower levels of hemolysis compared to both other studies and the values in the kit insert (hemoglobin >5 g/l corresponds to +4 hemolysis index). We verified the hemolysis interference in the D-dimer test, which we thought was not compatible with the kit insert, under our own laboratory conditions. This is the first hemolysis interference study performed with the Improgen brand d-dimer kit. In samples with a hemolysis rate of +2 and above, it would be more accurate to reject the D-dimer result as a 'hemolyzed sample'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
溶血对使用改进型试剂盒测量的 D-二聚体检测的影响:制造商提供的所有信息是否正确?
D-二聚体是一种纤维蛋白降解产物,其测量会受到溶血的影响。本研究旨在揭示本实验室溶血对 D-二聚体的影响值。在这项研究中,我们使用了机械法和冷冻法获得的溶血样本。所有血浆中的 D-二聚体水平均采用免疫比浊法,用 Improgen 诊断试剂盒进行测定。通过计算百分比差异来评估溶血样本的数值变化,通过计算最大可接受偏差(MAB)来评估临床显著差异。在采用冻融法和机械法制备的溶血样本研究中发现,低D-二聚体含量在+2溶血(相当于血红蛋白=1.01-2克/升)时不超过总允许误差(TAE)(30%),即使在+4溶血(相当于血红蛋白=1.01-2克/升)时也不超过MAB(65%)。即使在+4溶血时,高D-二聚体水平也没有超过TAE(30%)和MAB(68%)的限值。与其他研究和试剂盒说明书中的值相比,D-二聚体检测受较低水平溶血的影响(血红蛋白>5克/升对应+4溶血指数)。我们在自己的实验室条件下验证了我们认为与试剂盒说明书不符的 D-二聚体检测中的溶血干扰。这是用 Improgen 牌 D-二聚体试剂盒进行的首次溶血干扰研究。在溶血率为 +2 及以上的样本中,将 D-二聚体结果作为 "溶血样本 "剔除会更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis is an international fully refereed journal that features review and original research articles on all clinical, laboratory and experimental aspects of haemostasis and thrombosis. The journal is devoted to publishing significant developments worldwide in the field of blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, thrombosis, platelets and the kininogen-kinin system, as well as dealing with those aspects of blood rheology relevant to haemostasis and the effects of drugs on haemostatic components
期刊最新文献
Variation among venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools for postcesarean patients: a retrospective cohort study. Is the combination of two automated rapid assays for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia necessary? Challenges in managing severe homozygous protein c deficiency: a case report. A novel SERPINC1 c.119G>A (p.Cys40Tyr) mutation with variable clinical expression in an Indian family. A novel γ-chain mutation p.Asp318His in a Chinese family with dysfibrinogenemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1