Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus: an expert Delphi consensus to guide implementation in routine care.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY BMC Rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1186/s41927-024-00401-x
Isabel Castrejón, Laura Cano, María José Cuadrado, Joaquín Borrás, Maria Galindo, Tarek C Salman-Monte, Carlos Amorós, Carmen San Román, Isabel Cabezas, Marta Comellas, Alejandro Muñoz
{"title":"Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus: an expert Delphi consensus to guide implementation in routine care.","authors":"Isabel Castrejón, Laura Cano, María José Cuadrado, Joaquín Borrás, Maria Galindo, Tarek C Salman-Monte, Carlos Amorós, Carmen San Román, Isabel Cabezas, Marta Comellas, Alejandro Muñoz","doi":"10.1186/s41927-024-00401-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may result in great impact on patients' quality of life, social relationships, and work productivity. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care could help capture disease burden to guide SLE management and optimize disease control. We aimed to explore the current situation, appropriateness, and feasibility of PROMs to monitor patients with SLE in routine care, from healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scientific committee developed a Delphi questionnaire, based on a focus group with patients and a literature review, including 22 statements concerning: 1) Use of PROMs in routine care (n = 2); 2) PROMs in SLE management (n = 13); 3) Multidisciplinary management of patients with SLE (n = 4), and 4) Aspects on patient empowerment (n = 3). Statements included in Sects. 2-4 were assessed from three perspectives: current use, appropriateness, and feasibility (with currently available resources). For each statement, panellists specified their level of agreement using a 7-point Likert scale. A consensus was reached when ≥ 70% of the panellists agreed (6,7) or disagreed (1,2) on each statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine healthcare professionals and 16 patients with SLE participated in the Delphi-rounds. A consensus was reached on the value of PROMs to improve SLE management (83%) and the key role of healthcare professionals (77%) and the need for a digital tool connected to the electronic medical record (85%) to promote and facilitate PROMs collection. PROMs most frequently used in clinical practice are pain (56%), patient's global assessment (44%) and fatigue (39%), all on visual analogue scales. Panellists agreed on the need to implement multidisciplinary consultation (79%), unify complementary tests (88%), incorporate pharmacists into the healthcare team (70%), and develop home medication dispensing and informed telepharmacy programmes (72%) to improve quality of care in patients with SLE. According to panellists, patient associations (82%) and nurses (80%) are critical to educate and train patients on PROMs to enhance patient empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although pain, fatigue, and global assessment were identified as the most feasible, PROMs are not widely used in routine care in Spain. The present Delphi consensus can provide a road map for their implementation being key for SLE management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"8 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11251319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-024-00401-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may result in great impact on patients' quality of life, social relationships, and work productivity. The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care could help capture disease burden to guide SLE management and optimize disease control. We aimed to explore the current situation, appropriateness, and feasibility of PROMs to monitor patients with SLE in routine care, from healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives.

Methods: A scientific committee developed a Delphi questionnaire, based on a focus group with patients and a literature review, including 22 statements concerning: 1) Use of PROMs in routine care (n = 2); 2) PROMs in SLE management (n = 13); 3) Multidisciplinary management of patients with SLE (n = 4), and 4) Aspects on patient empowerment (n = 3). Statements included in Sects. 2-4 were assessed from three perspectives: current use, appropriateness, and feasibility (with currently available resources). For each statement, panellists specified their level of agreement using a 7-point Likert scale. A consensus was reached when ≥ 70% of the panellists agreed (6,7) or disagreed (1,2) on each statement.

Results: Fifty-nine healthcare professionals and 16 patients with SLE participated in the Delphi-rounds. A consensus was reached on the value of PROMs to improve SLE management (83%) and the key role of healthcare professionals (77%) and the need for a digital tool connected to the electronic medical record (85%) to promote and facilitate PROMs collection. PROMs most frequently used in clinical practice are pain (56%), patient's global assessment (44%) and fatigue (39%), all on visual analogue scales. Panellists agreed on the need to implement multidisciplinary consultation (79%), unify complementary tests (88%), incorporate pharmacists into the healthcare team (70%), and develop home medication dispensing and informed telepharmacy programmes (72%) to improve quality of care in patients with SLE. According to panellists, patient associations (82%) and nurses (80%) are critical to educate and train patients on PROMs to enhance patient empowerment.

Conclusions: Although pain, fatigue, and global assessment were identified as the most feasible, PROMs are not widely used in routine care in Spain. The present Delphi consensus can provide a road map for their implementation being key for SLE management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者报告的系统性红斑狼疮疗效指标:专家德尔菲共识,指导常规护理的实施。
背景:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)可能会对患者的生活质量、社会关系和工作效率造成严重影响。在日常护理中使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)有助于了解疾病负担,从而指导系统性红斑狼疮的治疗并优化疾病控制。我们旨在从医护人员和患者的角度出发,探讨在常规护理中监测系统性红斑狼疮患者的PROMs的现状、适宜性和可行性:一个科学委员会在与患者进行焦点小组讨论和查阅文献的基础上,编制了一份德尔菲问卷,其中包括22项陈述,分别涉及:1)PROMs在常规护理中的应用(n = 2);2)PROMs在系统性红斑狼疮管理中的应用(n = 13);3)系统性红斑狼疮患者的多学科管理(n = 4);4)患者赋权方面(n = 3)。第 2-4 节中的陈述从三个方面进行了评估。2-4 节中的声明从三个方面进行了评估:当前使用情况、适当性和可行性(在当前可用资源的情况下)。对于每项陈述,专家组成员均使用 7 点李克特量表来确定其同意程度。当≥70%的专家组成员同意(6,7)或不同意(1,2)每项陈述时,即达成共识:59名医护人员和16名系统性红斑狼疮患者参加了德尔菲讨论会。大家对 PROMs 在改善系统性红斑狼疮管理方面的价值(83%)、医护人员的关键作用(77%)以及需要一个与电子病历相连接的数字工具(85%)以促进和便利 PROMs 的收集达成了共识。临床实践中最常用的 PROMs 是疼痛(56%)、患者总体评估(44%)和疲劳(39%),均采用视觉模拟量表。为了提高系统性红斑狼疮患者的护理质量,专家组成员一致认为有必要开展多学科会诊(79%)、统一辅助检查(88%)、将药剂师纳入医疗团队(70%),并制定家庭配药和知情远程用药计划(72%)。小组成员认为,患者协会(82%)和护士(80%)对于教育和培训患者了解PROMs以增强患者能力至关重要:尽管疼痛、疲劳和总体评估被认为是最可行的方法,但在西班牙,PROMs 并未广泛应用于常规护理中。目前的德尔菲共识可以为系统性红斑狼疮管理的关键--PROMs 的实施提供路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between osteoprotegerin and RANKL single nucleotide polymorphisms and destructive rhinosinusitis in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Thermographic and ultrasound assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: can thermography detect subclinical synovitis at the wrist? Rheumatoid arthritis and COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Classification of salivary gland biopsies in Sjögren's syndrome by a convolutional neural network using an auto-machine learning platform. Prevalence of co-existing autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases in vitiligo: a survey-based study from Egypt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1