Evaluating the Clinical Impact and Feasibility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Pazopanib in a Real-World Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Cohort.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s40262-024-01399-8
Marinda Meertens, Eline L Giraud, Maud B A van der Kleij, Kim Westerdijk, Niels A D Guchelaar, Roos F Bleckman, Amy Rieborn, Alex L T Imholz, Hans-Martin Otten, Annelie Vulink, Maartje Los, Paul Hamberg, Winette T A van der Graaf, Hans Gelderblom, Dirk Jan A R Moes, K Esther Broekman, Daan J Touw, Stijn L W Koolen, Ron H J Mathijssen, Alwin D R Huitema, Nielka P van Erp, Ingrid M E Desar, Neeltje Steeghs
{"title":"Evaluating the Clinical Impact and Feasibility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Pazopanib in a Real-World Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Cohort.","authors":"Marinda Meertens, Eline L Giraud, Maud B A van der Kleij, Kim Westerdijk, Niels A D Guchelaar, Roos F Bleckman, Amy Rieborn, Alex L T Imholz, Hans-Martin Otten, Annelie Vulink, Maartje Los, Paul Hamberg, Winette T A van der Graaf, Hans Gelderblom, Dirk Jan A R Moes, K Esther Broekman, Daan J Touw, Stijn L W Koolen, Ron H J Mathijssen, Alwin D R Huitema, Nielka P van Erp, Ingrid M E Desar, Neeltje Steeghs","doi":"10.1007/s40262-024-01399-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>Pazopanib is registered for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Its variable pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and narrow therapeutic range provide a strong rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Prior studies have defined target levels of drug exposure (≥ 20.5 mg/L) linked to prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but the added value of using TDM remains unclear. This study investigates the effect of TDM of pazopanib in patients with STS on survival outcomes and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and evaluates the feasibility of TDM-guided dosing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A TDM-guided cohort was compared to a non-TDM-guided cohort for PFS, overall survival (OS) and DLTs. PK samples were available from all patients, though not acted upon in the non-TDM-guided cohort. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM by comparing the proportion of underdosed patients in our TDM cohort with data from previous publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 STS patients were included in the TDM-guided cohort (n = 95) and non-TDM-guided cohort (n = 27). The average exposure in the overall population was 30.5 mg/L and was similar in both groups. Median PFS and OS did not differ between the TDM-guided cohort and non-TDM-guided cohort (respectively 5.5 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.3, and 12.6 vs 10.1 months, p = 0.8). Slightly more patients in the non-TDM-guided cohort experienced DLTs (54%) compared to the TDM-guided cohort (44%). The proportion of underdosed patients (13.3%) was halved compared to historical data (26.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TDM reduced the proportion of patients with subtherapeutic exposure levels by ~ 50%. Nonetheless, the added value of TDM for achieving target trough levels of ≥ 20.5 mg/L for pazopanib on survival outcomes could not be confirmed in STS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-024-01399-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Pazopanib is registered for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Its variable pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and narrow therapeutic range provide a strong rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Prior studies have defined target levels of drug exposure (≥ 20.5 mg/L) linked to prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), but the added value of using TDM remains unclear. This study investigates the effect of TDM of pazopanib in patients with STS on survival outcomes and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and evaluates the feasibility of TDM-guided dosing.

Methods: A TDM-guided cohort was compared to a non-TDM-guided cohort for PFS, overall survival (OS) and DLTs. PK samples were available from all patients, though not acted upon in the non-TDM-guided cohort. We evaluated the feasibility of TDM by comparing the proportion of underdosed patients in our TDM cohort with data from previous publications.

Results: A total of 122 STS patients were included in the TDM-guided cohort (n = 95) and non-TDM-guided cohort (n = 27). The average exposure in the overall population was 30.5 mg/L and was similar in both groups. Median PFS and OS did not differ between the TDM-guided cohort and non-TDM-guided cohort (respectively 5.5 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.3, and 12.6 vs 10.1 months, p = 0.8). Slightly more patients in the non-TDM-guided cohort experienced DLTs (54%) compared to the TDM-guided cohort (44%). The proportion of underdosed patients (13.3%) was halved compared to historical data (26.7%).

Conclusion: TDM reduced the proportion of patients with subtherapeutic exposure levels by ~ 50%. Nonetheless, the added value of TDM for achieving target trough levels of ≥ 20.5 mg/L for pazopanib on survival outcomes could not be confirmed in STS patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估帕唑帕尼治疗药物监测在真实世界软组织肉瘤队列中的临床影响和可行性。
简介和目的:帕唑帕尼注册用于治疗转移性肾细胞癌和软组织肉瘤(STS)。其可变的药代动力学(PK)特性和狭窄的治疗范围为治疗药物监测(TDM)提供了强有力的依据。先前的研究已经确定了与延长无进展生存期(PFS)相关的药物暴露目标水平(≥ 20.5 mg/L),但使用 TDM 的附加值仍不明确。本研究调查了帕唑帕尼在STS患者中的TDM对生存结果和剂量限制性毒性(DLT)的影响,并评估了TDM指导给药的可行性:方法:比较了TDM指导组群与非TDM指导组群的PFS、总生存期(OS)和DLTs。所有患者均可获得 PK 样本,但在非 TDM 指导的队列中未采取行动。我们将 TDM 队列中剂量不足患者的比例与之前发表的数据进行了比较,从而评估了 TDM 的可行性:结果:TDM指导队列(95人)和非TDM指导队列(27人)共纳入了122名STS患者。总体的平均暴露量为 30.5 mg/L,两组患者的暴露量相似。TDM指导队列和非TDM指导队列的中位生存期和OS没有差异(分别为5.5个月 vs 4.4个月,p = 0.3;12.6个月 vs 10.1个月,p = 0.8)。出现 DLT 的非 TDM 指导队列患者(54%)略多于 TDM 指导队列患者(44%)。与历史数据(26.7%)相比,剂量不足患者的比例(13.3%)减少了一半:结论:TDM 将暴露于亚治疗水平的患者比例降低了约 50%。尽管如此,在STS患者中,TDM对于实现帕唑帕尼目标谷水平≥ 20.5 mg/L对生存结果的附加值仍无法得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Voriconazole Metabolism: A Middle-Out Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling Framework Integrating In Vitro and Clinical Insights. Clinical Pharmacology of Asciminib: A Review. Changes in Plasma Clearance of CYP450 Probe Drugs May Not be Specific for Altered In Vivo Enzyme Activity Under (Patho)Physiological Conditions: How to Interpret Findings of Probe Cocktail Studies. Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Norepinephrine in Healthy Volunteers Prior to and During General Anesthesia. Impact of Continuous Infusion Meropenem PK/PD Target Attainment on C-Reactive Protein Dynamics in Critically Ill Patients With Documented Gram-Negative Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1