Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients: a prospective observational study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Implant Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1186/s40729-024-00552-z
Emile Chrabieh, Christine Hanna, Stephanie Mrad, Stephanie Rameh, Joseph Bassil, Joseph Zaarour
{"title":"Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Emile Chrabieh, Christine Hanna, Stephanie Mrad, Stephanie Rameh, Joseph Bassil, Joseph Zaarour","doi":"10.1186/s40729-024-00552-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the amount of distortion using computer-guided implant surgery with 3D printed surgical guides in limited edentulous spaces.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>25 bone level self-tapping implants (Straumann® BL and BLT) were randomly inserted in either distal or intercalary posterior mandibular edentulism using a fully digital protocol and 3D printed surgical guides. Amount of inaccuracy was evaluated after superimposing the 3 coordinates of virtually planned and final implant images, which were obtained using intra-oral scans and scan bodies. Four evaluation parameters were considered: origo-displacement, error depth, apical displacement and angle between the planned and the placed implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average of distortion was 0.71 mm for the origo-displacement, 0.36 mm for the error depth, 0.52 mm for the horizontal displacement and 3.34º for the error angle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The major reason of exclusion was CBCT artifacts. Results of this study were aligned with the results of previous studies concerning partially edentulous spaces. CAD/CAM manufacturing process did not result in significant distortion whilst the biggest part of distortions originated from the surgical process. The learning curve in computer-guided implant surgery presented an important source of inaccuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"10 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11252094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00552-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the amount of distortion using computer-guided implant surgery with 3D printed surgical guides in limited edentulous spaces.

Materials and methods: 25 bone level self-tapping implants (Straumann® BL and BLT) were randomly inserted in either distal or intercalary posterior mandibular edentulism using a fully digital protocol and 3D printed surgical guides. Amount of inaccuracy was evaluated after superimposing the 3 coordinates of virtually planned and final implant images, which were obtained using intra-oral scans and scan bodies. Four evaluation parameters were considered: origo-displacement, error depth, apical displacement and angle between the planned and the placed implant.

Results: The average of distortion was 0.71 mm for the origo-displacement, 0.36 mm for the error depth, 0.52 mm for the horizontal displacement and 3.34º for the error angle.

Conclusion: The major reason of exclusion was CBCT artifacts. Results of this study were aligned with the results of previous studies concerning partially edentulous spaces. CAD/CAM manufacturing process did not result in significant distortion whilst the biggest part of distortions originated from the surgical process. The learning curve in computer-guided implant surgery presented an important source of inaccuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部分缺牙患者在计算机引导下进行种植手术的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
材料与方法:使用全数字化方案和三维打印手术导板,在下颌后方缺牙区远端或闰端随机植入25颗骨水平自攻种植体(Straumann® BL和BLT)。将使用口内扫描和扫描体获得的虚拟计划和最终种植体图像的 3 个坐标叠加后,对误差程度进行评估。评估参数包括四个方面:原始位移、误差深度、根尖位移以及计划种植体与植入种植体之间的角度:结果:原始位移的平均变形量为 0.71 毫米,误差深度为 0.36 毫米,水平位移为 0.52 毫米,误差角度为 3.34º:排除的主要原因是 CBCT 的伪影。本研究的结果与之前关于部分缺牙空间的研究结果一致。计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)过程并没有导致明显的变形,而最大部分的变形来自于手术过程。计算机辅助种植手术的学习曲线是造成误差的重要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
期刊最新文献
The systemic and local interactions related to titanium implant corrosion and hypersensitivity reactions: a narrative review of the literature. Implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever: a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comparative study on bone density before and after implant placement using osseodensification technique: a clinical evaluation. Peri-implant bone regeneration in pigs. Effectiveness of cold atmospheric plasma in decontaminating enterococcus faecalis colonized collagen and PTFE membranes used in guided bone regeneration: a comparative in vitro investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1