Decreased Completion of Ordered Laboratories and Imaging in Telehealth Compared With In-person Hepatology Encounters.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002023
Jacqueline B Henson, Yuval A Patel, April H Wall, Andrew J Muir
{"title":"Decreased Completion of Ordered Laboratories and Imaging in Telehealth Compared With In-person Hepatology Encounters.","authors":"Jacqueline B Henson, Yuval A Patel, April H Wall, Andrew J Muir","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate order completion after telehealth compared with in-person encounters.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Completion of ordered testing, including laboratories and imaging, is an important aspect of successful outpatient care of patients with liver disease. Whether the completion of orders from telehealth encounters differs from in-person visits is unknown.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Completion of ordered laboratories and imaging from hepatology encounters at our center from 2021 to 2022 were evaluated and compared between video telehealth and in-person visits. Laboratory completion was evaluated at 14 days, 30 days, and 90 days, and imaging completion was assessed at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Telehealth encounters were significantly less likely to have laboratories completed at all evaluated time points (14 d: 40.7% vs 90.9%; 30 d: 50.9% vs 92.2%; 90 d: 63.9% vs 94.3%, P< 0.001 for all). Among telehealth encounters, encounters in patients more remote from the center were less likely to have laboratories completed. Imaging ordered at telehealth encounters was also less likely to be completed within 1 year (62.5% vs 70.1%, P< 0.001), including liver ultrasounds (59.1% vs 67.6%, P= 0.001), which persisted when limited to encounters for cirrhosis (55.8% vs 66.4%, P= 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth encounters were significantly less likely to have ordered laboratories and imaging completed compared with in-person visits, which has important clinical implications for effective outpatient care of patients with liver disease. Further research is needed to better understand the barriers to order completion for telehealth visits and ways to optimize this to improve the effectiveness of this visit modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate order completion after telehealth compared with in-person encounters.

Background: Completion of ordered testing, including laboratories and imaging, is an important aspect of successful outpatient care of patients with liver disease. Whether the completion of orders from telehealth encounters differs from in-person visits is unknown.

Materials and methods: Completion of ordered laboratories and imaging from hepatology encounters at our center from 2021 to 2022 were evaluated and compared between video telehealth and in-person visits. Laboratory completion was evaluated at 14 days, 30 days, and 90 days, and imaging completion was assessed at 1 year.

Results: Telehealth encounters were significantly less likely to have laboratories completed at all evaluated time points (14 d: 40.7% vs 90.9%; 30 d: 50.9% vs 92.2%; 90 d: 63.9% vs 94.3%, P< 0.001 for all). Among telehealth encounters, encounters in patients more remote from the center were less likely to have laboratories completed. Imaging ordered at telehealth encounters was also less likely to be completed within 1 year (62.5% vs 70.1%, P< 0.001), including liver ultrasounds (59.1% vs 67.6%, P= 0.001), which persisted when limited to encounters for cirrhosis (55.8% vs 66.4%, P= 0.01).

Conclusions: Telehealth encounters were significantly less likely to have ordered laboratories and imaging completed compared with in-person visits, which has important clinical implications for effective outpatient care of patients with liver disease. Further research is needed to better understand the barriers to order completion for telehealth visits and ways to optimize this to improve the effectiveness of this visit modality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与亲临现场的肝病就诊相比,远程医疗中的化验和影像检查完成率有所下降。
摘要背景:评估远程医疗与面对面就诊相比的医嘱完成情况:背景:完成包括化验和影像学检查在内的医嘱检查是成功为肝病患者提供门诊治疗的一个重要方面。远程医疗与面对面就诊在完成医嘱方面是否存在差异尚不清楚:对本中心 2021 年至 2022 年期间肝病门诊的化验单和影像学检查单的完成情况进行了评估,并在视频远程医疗和亲自就诊之间进行了比较。实验室完成情况在 14 天、30 天和 90 天时进行评估,成像完成情况在 1 年时进行评估:结果:在所有评估时间点,远程医疗就诊者完成化验的可能性都明显较低(14 天:40.7% 对 90.9%):14天:40.7% vs 90.9%;30天:50.9% vs 92.250.9% vs 92.2%;90 d:63.9% vs 94.3%,P<0.001)。在远程医疗会诊中,距离中心较远的患者完成实验室检查的可能性较低。在远程医疗会诊中,包括肝脏超声波检查(59.1% vs 67.6%,P= 0.001)在内的影像学检查在 1 年内完成的可能性也较低(62.5% vs 70.1%,P< 0.001),当仅限于肝硬化会诊时,这种情况依然存在(55.8% vs 66.4%,P= 0.01):结论:与亲自就诊相比,远程医疗就诊者完成化验和影像检查的几率明显较低,这对肝病患者的有效门诊治疗具有重要的临床意义。我们需要进一步研究,以更好地了解远程医疗就诊中完成医嘱的障碍,以及如何优化这种就诊方式,从而提高这种就诊方式的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Colonoscopy Use Among Asian Indians in New York City, 2003 to 2016. Application of a Machine Learning Predictive Model for Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. FIB-4 as a Time-varying Covariate and Its Association With Severe Liver Disease in Primary Care: A Time-dependent Cox Regression Analysis. Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Serrated Colorectal Polyps ≥10 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Placement Compared With Surgical and Radiologic Jejunostomy Placement: A Nationwide Inpatient Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1