Impact of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade on Mortality and Allograft Loss among Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nephron Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1159/000540305
Chin-Wei Kung, Yi-Chih Lin, Chi-Shin Tseng, Yu-Hsiang Chou
{"title":"Impact of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade on Mortality and Allograft Loss among Renal Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chin-Wei Kung, Yi-Chih Lin, Chi-Shin Tseng, Yu-Hsiang Chou","doi":"10.1159/000540305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has a beneficial effect on reducing the levels of proteinuria and blood pressure in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and reduces the risk of developing end-stage kidney disease in CKD patients. Nonetheless, a debate persists regarding the impact of RAS inhibitors on outcomes such as mortality and graft survival in renal transplant patients. To assess the effect of RAS inhibitors on graft recipients in the past decade, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials from January 1, 2012, to August 1, 2022. We included 14 articles, comprising 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 cohort studies, including 45,377 patients. These studies compared patient or graft survival between an RAS inhibitor treatment arm and a control arm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that RAS blockade was significantly associated with lower mortality in cohort studies (risk ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.79), reduced allograft loss in cohort studies (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.54-0.71), and significant changes in systolic blood pressure in RCTs. Subgroup analysis of the groups of interest (interventions involving RAS blockade, follow-up period of ≥5 years) showed consistently reduced mortality (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56-0.81) and reduced allograft loss (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.54-0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrated that the application of RAS blockade among renal transplant recipients was associated with lower mortality and allograft loss in cohort studies but not in RCTs. More powered clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effects of RAS blockade in renal transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has a beneficial effect on reducing the levels of proteinuria and blood pressure in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and reduces the risk of developing end-stage kidney disease in CKD patients. Nonetheless, a debate persists regarding the impact of RAS inhibitors on outcomes such as mortality and graft survival in renal transplant patients. To assess the effect of RAS inhibitors on graft recipients in the past decade, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials from January 1, 2012, to August 1, 2022. We included 14 articles, comprising 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 cohort studies, including 45,377 patients. These studies compared patient or graft survival between an RAS inhibitor treatment arm and a control arm.

Results: The meta-analysis revealed that RAS blockade was significantly associated with lower mortality in cohort studies (risk ratio [RR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.79), reduced allograft loss in cohort studies (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.54-0.71), and significant changes in systolic blood pressure in RCTs. Subgroup analysis of the groups of interest (interventions involving RAS blockade, follow-up period of ≥5 years) showed consistently reduced mortality (RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56-0.81) and reduced allograft loss (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.54-0.70).

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that the application of RAS blockade among renal transplant recipients was associated with lower mortality and allograft loss in cohort studies but not in RCTs. More powered clinical trials are needed to evaluate the effects of RAS blockade in renal transplant recipients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾素-血管紧张素系统阻断对肾移植受者死亡率和异体移植损失的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
简介阻断肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)对降低慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的蛋白尿和血压水平有好处,并能降低 CKD 患者罹患终末期肾脏病(ESKD)的风险。然而,关于 RAS 抑制剂对肾移植患者死亡率和移植物存活率等结果的影响仍存在争议。为了评估过去十年中 RAS 抑制剂对移植受者的影响,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析:我们检索了从 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 1 日的 Embase、PubMed 和 Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials。我们共纳入了 14 篇文章,包括 5 项随机对照试验 (RCT) 和 9 项队列研究,其中包括 45,377 名患者。这些研究比较了RAS抑制剂治疗组和对照组的患者或移植物存活率:荟萃分析表明,在队列研究中,RAS阻断与较低的死亡率显著相关(风险比 [RR] = 0.66,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.55-0.79),在队列研究中与减少异体移植物损失显著相关(RR = 0.62,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.54-0.71),在 RCT 中与收缩压的显著变化显著相关。对相关组别(涉及RAS阻断的干预措施、随访时间≥5年)进行的亚组分析表明,死亡率(RR = 0.67,95% CI:0.56-0.81)和异体移植损失(RR = 0.61,95% CI:0.54-0.70)持续降低:我们的研究结果表明,在队列研究中,肾移植受者应用RAS阻断与降低死亡率和同种异体移植损失有关,但在研究性临床试验中则没有相关性。需要更多的临床试验来评估RAS阻断剂对肾移植受者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
期刊最新文献
Sex Differences in Kidney Health and Disease. Myths, Realities and Pathways Forward -- A Patient's Thoughts on Person-Centred Care. Demand Analysis of Self-Management Mobile Health Applications for Middle-Aged and older Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Based on the Kano Model. An Outbreak of Shiga Toxin-Positive Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli 0104:H4 Related Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Turkey: A Multicenter Study. NF-κB/miR-455-5p/SOCS3 axis aggravates sepsis induced acute kidney injury through promoting renal inflammation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1