[Survey on maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation: experiences from Italian transplant centers.]

Q3 Medicine Recenti progressi in medicina Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1701/4314.42988
Arianna Bellini, Alessandro C Rosa, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Marco Massari, Lucia Masiero, Marco Finocchietti, Claudia Marino, Nera Agabiti, Massimo Cardillo, Nicoletta Luxi, Gianluca Trifirò, Pamela Fiaschetti, Marina Davoli, Antonio Addis, Valeria Belleudi
{"title":"[Survey on maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation: experiences from Italian transplant centers.]","authors":"Arianna Bellini, Alessandro C Rosa, Stefania Spila Alegiani, Marco Massari, Lucia Masiero, Marco Finocchietti, Claudia Marino, Nera Agabiti, Massimo Cardillo, Nicoletta Luxi, Gianluca Trifirò, Pamela Fiaschetti, Marina Davoli, Antonio Addis, Valeria Belleudi","doi":"10.1701/4314.42988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The post-organ transplant immunosuppressive therapy includes the administration of tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine (CsA), along with antimetabolites (Antim) or mTOR inhibitors, with or without prednisone. A survey was conducted to investigate clinical experience regarding the use, efficacy, safety profile, and determinants of choice of maintenance immunosuppressive therapies. The questionnaire was sent to healthcare workers of 45 transplant centers specializing in kidney (K), liver (L), heart (H), and lung (P) transplants. Seventy-one responses were received from 15 Italian regions. The indicated first-choice therapy was Tac + Antim, except in the hepatic field where Tac monotherapy was favored. According to 44.1% of respondents, the first-choice therapy has changed over the last 15 years due to the replacement of CsA with Tac and increased use of mTOR inhibitors. Regarding the determinants of the index therapy, the choice of schemes to be applied depends mainly on international guidelines, previous experience, and internal protocols within the facility (80.3%; 54.9%; 50.7%, respectively). Compared to standard therapy, the criteria guiding the prescription of different therapies mainly involve the presence of comorbidities (K: 81.3%; L: 88.2%; H: 73.3%; P: 85.7%) and the evaluation of specific clinical parameters of the recipient. Additionally, the majority of respondents are in favor of using generic versions where available. The survey reveals dimensions not detectable by current healthcare administrative flows; such integrations provide a broader picture of the factors influencing the choice of post-transplant immunosuppressive therapeutic schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4314.42988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The post-organ transplant immunosuppressive therapy includes the administration of tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine (CsA), along with antimetabolites (Antim) or mTOR inhibitors, with or without prednisone. A survey was conducted to investigate clinical experience regarding the use, efficacy, safety profile, and determinants of choice of maintenance immunosuppressive therapies. The questionnaire was sent to healthcare workers of 45 transplant centers specializing in kidney (K), liver (L), heart (H), and lung (P) transplants. Seventy-one responses were received from 15 Italian regions. The indicated first-choice therapy was Tac + Antim, except in the hepatic field where Tac monotherapy was favored. According to 44.1% of respondents, the first-choice therapy has changed over the last 15 years due to the replacement of CsA with Tac and increased use of mTOR inhibitors. Regarding the determinants of the index therapy, the choice of schemes to be applied depends mainly on international guidelines, previous experience, and internal protocols within the facility (80.3%; 54.9%; 50.7%, respectively). Compared to standard therapy, the criteria guiding the prescription of different therapies mainly involve the presence of comorbidities (K: 81.3%; L: 88.2%; H: 73.3%; P: 85.7%) and the evaluation of specific clinical parameters of the recipient. Additionally, the majority of respondents are in favor of using generic versions where available. The survey reveals dimensions not detectable by current healthcare administrative flows; such integrations provide a broader picture of the factors influencing the choice of post-transplant immunosuppressive therapeutic schemes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[关于接受实体器官移植患者的维持性免疫抑制疗法的调查:意大利移植中心的经验]。
器官移植后的免疫抑制疗法包括使用他克莫司(Tac)或环孢素(CsA),以及抗代谢药(Antim)或 mTOR 抑制剂,同时使用或不使用泼尼松。为了调查有关维持性免疫抑制疗法的使用、疗效、安全性和决定因素的临床经验,我们进行了一项调查。调查问卷发送给了 45 个移植中心的医护人员,这些中心专门从事肾(K)、肝(L)、心(H)和肺(P)移植手术。共收到来自意大利 15 个地区的 71 份回复。首选疗法是 Tac + Antim,但在肝脏领域,Tac 单药疗法受到青睐。44.1%的受访者表示,由于 Tac 取代了 CsA 以及 mTOR 抑制剂的使用增加,首选疗法在过去 15 年中发生了变化。关于指标疗法的决定因素,选择哪种方案主要取决于国际指南、以往的经验和医疗机构的内部方案(分别为 80.3%、54.9% 和 50.7%)。与标准疗法相比,不同疗法的处方指导标准主要涉及是否存在合并症(K:81.3%;L:88.2%;H:73.3%;P:85.7%)以及对受试者特定临床参数的评估。此外,大多数受访者赞成使用现有的非专利药。该调查揭示了当前医疗保健管理流程无法发现的层面;这种整合提供了影响移植后免疫抑制治疗方案选择的更广泛的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
期刊最新文献
[Clinical management of a patient with non-triple-negative breast cancer who converts to a triple-negative subtype at recurrence.] Twelve tips for medical teachers to facilitate effective discussion among students to engage in reflective interpretation of Museum Arts [Effectiveness and tolerability of sacituzumab govitecan in elderly patient with advanced triple negative breast cancer.] [Efficacy of topical tirbanibulin in treating grade 2 actinic keratosis.] [Expertise or talent: what is more important in a doctor?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1