Pancreas-left gastric artery angle predicts difficulty of suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02890-2
Ryugo Teranishi, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Takuro Saito, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Kota Momose, Kotaro Yamashita, Koji Tanaka, Tomoki Makino, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki
{"title":"Pancreas-left gastric artery angle predicts difficulty of suprapancreatic lymph node dissection in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ryugo Teranishi, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Takuro Saito, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Kota Momose, Kotaro Yamashita, Koji Tanaka, Tomoki Makino, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02890-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Suprapancreatic lymph node dissection is one of the most challenging procedures performed in the treatment of gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether the pancreas-left gastric artery angle (PLA) can be used to predict the difficulty of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center cross-sectional study. Before gastrectomy, the patients were classified according to the size of the PLA into the small PLA (s-PLA; < 30°) and large PLA (l-PLA; ≥ 30°) groups in a surgeon-blinded manner. After gastrectomy, a surgeon evaluated suprapancreatic lymph node dissection as hard, normal, or easy to perform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three patients were enrolled in the study. Surgeons evaluated lymph node dissection as hard in 43.8 and 8.7% of patients in the s-PLA and l-PLA groups, respectively (p = 0.002). The time taken for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection was also significantly longer in the s-PLA group than in the l-PLA group (p = 0.040). In patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy, the time for node dissection in the s-PLA group was also significantly longer than that in the s-PLA group (p = 0.021), while there was no difference in those who underwent robotic surgery (p = 0.815).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PLA is useful for predicting the degree of difficulty of suprapancreatic lymph node dissection during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02890-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Suprapancreatic lymph node dissection is one of the most challenging procedures performed in the treatment of gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether the pancreas-left gastric artery angle (PLA) can be used to predict the difficulty of the procedure.

Methods: This was a single-center cross-sectional study. Before gastrectomy, the patients were classified according to the size of the PLA into the small PLA (s-PLA; < 30°) and large PLA (l-PLA; ≥ 30°) groups in a surgeon-blinded manner. After gastrectomy, a surgeon evaluated suprapancreatic lymph node dissection as hard, normal, or easy to perform.

Results: Seventy-three patients were enrolled in the study. Surgeons evaluated lymph node dissection as hard in 43.8 and 8.7% of patients in the s-PLA and l-PLA groups, respectively (p = 0.002). The time taken for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection was also significantly longer in the s-PLA group than in the l-PLA group (p = 0.040). In patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy, the time for node dissection in the s-PLA group was also significantly longer than that in the s-PLA group (p = 0.021), while there was no difference in those who underwent robotic surgery (p = 0.815).

Conclusion: PLA is useful for predicting the degree of difficulty of suprapancreatic lymph node dissection during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰腺-胃左动脉角度预测胃癌胃切除术中胰上淋巴结清扫的难度:一项横断面研究。
目的:胰上淋巴结清扫术是胃癌治疗中最具挑战性的手术之一。本研究旨在探讨胰腺-胃左动脉角(PLA)是否可用于预测手术难度:这是一项单中心横断面研究。方法:这是一项单中心横断面研究。胃切除术前,根据胰左动脉角的大小将患者分为小胰左动脉角(s-PLA)和大胰左动脉角(s-PLA)两类:73名患者参与了研究。外科医生认为小PLA组和大PLA组分别有43.8%和8.7%的患者难以进行淋巴结清扫(P = 0.002)。胰上淋巴结清扫所需的时间,s-PLA 组也明显长于 l-PLA 组(p = 0.040)。在接受腹腔镜胃切除术的患者中,s-PLA组的淋巴结清扫时间也明显长于s-PLA组(p = 0.021),而接受机器人手术的患者则没有差异(p = 0.815):结论:PLA可用于预测胃癌胃切除术中胰上淋巴结清扫的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Is the use of direct oral anticoagulants after non-cardiac thoracic surgery safe for patients? Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Outcomes and pathologic response of primary lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor/immune checkpoint inhibitor before salvage surgery. Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Development of a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy simulator: Sigmaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1